Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

2STAR

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,099

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

890 Excellent

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Interests
    Played Amateur Rugby League for total 24yrs in Bradford , Rochdale & a short spell in Wakefield , Also a short spell with Union in Sunbury on Thames early 1970's ,suffering now in my later years for all the knocks & injuries etc, but would do it all again !! enjoying watching Union also now since it went Pro.
  • Location
    Wakefield

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Single Status Update

See all updates by 2STAR

  1. williamnohair

    Hi

    I have tried both, the Meade obviously needs less exposure and cannot be used for observing (if you needed to) its only drawback is that you don't get a flat image as there is a fair amount of distortion around the edges.

    The opposite is true for the Celestron however you need the diagonal to get focus.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.