Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_android_vs_ios_winners.thumb.jpg.803608cf7eedd5cfb31eedc3e3f357e9.jpg

Levdr

Members
  • Content Count

    51
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Good

About Levdr

  • Rank
    Nebula

Profile Information

  • Location
    Amsterdam
  1. I too agree totally with iamjulian. I myself had very little money earlier this year when I started. I decided to buy last year's model refractor, a Skywatcher ed 80mm on a CG-5 mount. It cost me 430 euro. As I had a budget of 500 euro there was money left for some small extra's and that was it. I already had a Canon 40D with a few good lenses and I started to experiment. A few weeks ago I bought a little motor (for 89 euro) so I can track the stars now and it works beautifully. Or you could buy an achromate, which is considerably less expensive than an apo/ed. Yes, there is the colour thingy, but that can be remedied, at least to a certain extent. And it would get you started and you could see if this is worth investing in. However, if you only have £ 200 to spend right now, I would recommend following the advice given by jbh, and that is to attach your camera directly to a motorised EQ mount. FLO sells the EQ3-2 for £ 159 and a single axis motor drive for £ 75. That's a bit over the 200 pounds mark, but not by much. You already have an excellent DSLR. And you'd be surprised at the results you can get with that set up! And for exploring the night sky a pair of simple 7x50 or 10x50 binoculars are just great!
  2. Great site. Bookmarked. Thank you for sharing!
  3. Oh, that is excellent! Thank you very much.
  4. I would be using it for lunar and planetary imaging, not deepsky, so a HEQ5 would suffice then. Right. Would this HEQ5 also be enough for some deepsky imaging with my 80mm ED refractor, you think?
  5. If I were to buy a Skymax 180mm OTA, and I wanted to use that for some astro imaging, which motorised (not GoTo!) mount would that require? TIA!
  6. Hi Steve, I just came into a bit of unexpected money and would LOVE to buy one of those remaining 180mm MAKs. Are these last two indeed gone now? I ask as on FLO it is still listed. Thanks.
  7. Well, t'was a while ago that I asked the question and since then I bought an adapter, ring and some other stuff from somebody on another forum, so I'm set. But thanks anyway
  8. I've been away for some time and had missed your question. Here's a link to eBay's terence-camera. This is the one I bought: eBay.be: Timer Remote Cord For Canon EOS 50D 30D 40D 5D Mark II (object 270436155601 eindtijd 29-okt-09 10:01:50 CET) Delivery was speedy (a week), and I had track&trace so could follow its whereabouts ("left Zhuanzan, China" or whatever it was... ). And it comes with a manual as well, with reasonably understandable English (albeit not always flawless). The device itself is great and does all the seller says it can do. I was also pleasantly surprised to find that the shutter works the same as on my Canon 40D: press it halfway and it focusses, press it all the way down and the photo is taken. One thing though: this one won't turn off. You can leave it on and if certain functions are off, it uses little power. I myself just take out the batteries and it's no problem.
  9. Hi Abernus, I'm also just a beginning stargazer. I haven't even looked through my new 80mm ED refractor yet as I'm waiting for the diagonal to arrive. But I have been looking at the night sky with just a pair of 7x50 binoculairs for quite some time now and doing that and consulting maps and Stellarium I am learning to find my way across the sky, recognising stars and constellations. Now often two or three stars are enough to identify the latter. And then, last weekend, I woke up some time before dawn, looked outside and the sky was unusually dark and just crystal clear. And there stood Orion. I took my humble binoculairs and looked and decided to try to find the Orion Nebula, M42, and there it was! Only just a couple of months ago I would never have seen it, would never have identified it as such as it was nothing but a mere smudge in my binoculars. But I saw it and I knew what it was and I was so excited that I almost dropped the binos. What I'm saying is, that it takes time to get to know the sky. You can have a light bucket, but it won't mean much if you don't know what you are doing. Study the star charts, download Stellarium and look up with your telescope and as you learn you will see more and more, simply because you know not only where to look but also how to look. This is my own experience at least. So cheer up about your small telescope!
  10. Thank you Mick and James. It sure was special.
  11. Nobody? Hmmm... maybe everybody is tired of my questions. Wouldn't blame you
  12. Thank you Craig. Yes, it was a very special feeling. M57 in Lyra must wait until Spring. It's position right now is to the west, and for me that's in the direction of the centre of the city and the sky is glowing yellowish there. Bright Vega can not be missed, but I can't distinguish anything else right now. During the Winter months Lyra will be too close to the horizon, if it surfaces at all, but in the Spring it should be right where I have the best chance of seeing it and hopefully find M57: high up in the North Eastern sky. So much sky to explore!
  13. I've been looking at some eyepieces to get started with and I was thinking of buying a pair of high(er) power TS Optics Super Plossls. They're inexpensive and appear to be of fair quality. The ones I've been looking at can also be used for 'eyepiece projection photography', which I think I will like, but I'm confused about the adaptors. They recommend a 'fotoring T2' and explain: "With the T2 photo ring, you can replace the rubber eyeguard by a T2 connector that is directly attached to the eyepiece. You may then attach your SLR camera (via an optional T2 ring) directly to the eyepiece." and I'm like: Què?! A 'T2 photo ring' and then another 'optional T2 ring'?? Here's what I would like to do: to connect these Super Plossls to my Canon 40D. Here's the link to the Plossls: Super Plössl - 6mm Brennweite - 1,25" - FMC Vergütung - Teleskop-Express: DER Astroshop + Fotografie + Naturbeobachtung Here's the link to the Fotoring T2 Adapter auf T2 - für 1,25" Okulare - kurze Bauweise - Teleskop-Express: DER Astroshop + Fotografie + Naturbeobachtung Help?
  14. Last night I woke up, about an hour before dawn, looked out the window and saw that the South-South-Eastern quadrant of the sky was crystal clear, and there it was: Orion. In al its glory. My mouth dropped. I could see things with the naked eye that on other nights I could hardly see through my binoculars. I then looked through those binoculars and the view was stunning. Now I had looked at Orion before, but just to make out its make up so to speak, to learn the constellation as a whole. Now, for the first time, I felt I could maybe see the Great Nebula I had seen so many breathtaking images off. I knew where to find it and almost immediately did. There could be no mistake: I was in fact looking at M42! I was so excited I almost dropped my binoculars. Then, after a while I went back to just using my eyes and with the help of a bit of peripheral view at first, I could see the nebula again. Very faint, very fuzzy, just a little smudge really, but unmistakably there. Isn't it great that once you know where to look exactly, and once you know what to look for, you can find so much more? I then hurried (as dawn was pending!) and took some photographs where you can clearly see the nebula. Wow, I have actually seen my first Messier Object!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.