Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

119 Excellent


About rorymultistorey

  • Rank

Contact Methods

  • Website URL

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Interests
  • Location
    light polluted London
  1. Is it possible to look at bricks satisfactorily without the tripod?
  2. Looks good. Mafrotto Fluid head nice. I bought the cheaper Neewer version with a heavy duty fluid head which has broken. The plastic legs were too flimsy. I have a monopod so will absolutely use that with my 7x50 binos. Great idea. Seems the Helios Binoculars are popular. I'm guessing there is not a huge amount of difference between the lightquest and the apollo versions? Interesting that you went for 15x version. I believe there is a lower magnification version. I'm starting to think that binos are really best at looking at star clusters and bright objects rather than dim nebula and maybe this is why observers prefer to have the higher magnification models rather than the widefield light bucket versions. Anyways thx for the reply
  3. Yeh thx for that. I think I have a tripod which would work. Binos look good too. Why did you go for the x22 rather than the x15s? Cheers rory
  4. Yeh it was getting a bit wobbly. I'd be really interested in getting some bigger bins with a tripod. Will a camera tripod do? And do you have any recommendations in the 500quid range?
  5. Hi all, I've made a video about my experience looking through binoculars at deep space objects. I am NOT an observer. So I expect I got a few things wrong. Particularly the fact that it was impossible to film in complete darkness. I'd be really interested to hear whether I was way off the mark or not. And what other deep space objects are good to look at through a small pair of binos. Many thx in advance.
  6. Just wanted to thank James for this post. I have purchase a budget AVX mount and spent last night with all the same issues. I'm so glad I came across this post before wasting more time buying new cables etc... I will test it today and see how it goes
  7. Secondary is suprisingly big. And the tube is made out of some kind of reinforced cardboard... I think. Looks eminently cuttable. I think this lovely scope is getting the chop
  8. Pics of the secondary assembly ( i hope) Doing this from my phone so bear with... Please note how thin the spider vanes are. They are made from ribbon, maybe rubber ribbon whoose tension can be tightened. How the the secondary only has an up down adjustment. And How the secondary can be rotated around a central shaft. Far better than the 3 screws which easily lead to miscollimation if your only collimating with a laser.
  9. Many thx chaps... Most enlightening BTW I used to go to a sailing club near Pershore when I was a kid. So 1/10 wave is not necessarily going to help me for astrophotography. Squaring the camera is more important. I happen to have an orion optics OC1 (I think) 2 inch focuser which I'm going to fix onto the tube. I will be using a full frame canon 5d mark ii with a 0.9 x skywatcher coma corrector for imaging. Having digested the above advice I think will use the brighter, newer, faster, synta f5 mirror AND controversially I will cut the end off the tube in order to reach focus. I mean how hard can it be (famous last words). [Maybe I should see if someone is keen to buy it before getting the saw out. Does seem a shame to carve up such a well made scope.] Also still curious to know whether high quality mirrors make any noticeable difference in DSO astrophotograhy or whether the only real benefit is planetary.
  10. So I picked up a classic... a 1970's - 80's edmund optics f6 150mm newtonian... ... like this one but mine has a different mount. It was cheap. Very good condition. The focuser is pants. The mechanics of the secondary holder is (IMHO) brilliant and apparently the primary is 1/10th wave. But its f6 and I trhink I'd rather swap it out for a faster synta f5 mirror. . The thing is its a one shot job bc to make the f5 mirror work I will have to saw off a good few cm from the barrel of the scope. So the question is: Is a high quality f6 mirror better than a faster synta f5 mirror for wide deep space astrophotograhy? All comments gratefully received.
  11. I have the 07870 borg super reducer with a very similar scope - a 60mm f5.9 tak . It works very well. Let me know if your still having trouble and i can share my settings. Also let me kniw if your thinking as selling as I'd be interested. Many thx Rory
  12. yeh I'll be working on it too... Just come from London to the dark skies of Devon for my hols but fear the clouds won't allow much astro fiddling. Let me know if you find a solution. Many thx Rory
  13. i've just come in from a night of imaging and had exactly the same thing... Did you figure is out. I'm guessing tilt either on my filter or the lens is dropping slighly in the adapter.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.