-
Posts
5,841 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
48
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Status Replies posted by mikeDnight
-
Your sketches are amazing! Can't wait to see more.
-
New scope incoming? Exciting!! 🇯🇵??
-
Sounds good to me! I'm looking forward to your thoughts on the 80mm Vixen. I had a 102mm F13 Vixen achromat in the mid 80's and it was excellent. Even DSO's were quite spectacular in that scope, despite its long focal length. I can't remember any false colour, but to be honest, I never looked for it. It's magic lay in its F ratio. It looked spectacular too!
-
-
Hi Mike any chance of posting the link to one of your posts where you showed some sketches you did? I can't seem to find it, I want to show my wife what you can see with a 100mm Tak.
I think you were commenting on someone buying an Altair Astro refractor.
Thank you,
Martin.
-
Hi Martin,
Below are a number of sketches all made using the Takahashi FC100DC, and all were made under reasonable to good conditions. For the deep sky observations I took every precaution to block out stray light. My little observatory has blacked out walls and floor and when observing outside the observatory, I use a blackout blanket over my head and eyepiece to maintain dark adaption as far as possible. When I find a deep sky object I study it for some time, rather than quickly moving on to the next. That way I allow the subtle detail to reveal itself.
The Moon:
The planets:
Deep Sky:
-
-
Hi Mike any chance of posting the link to one of your posts where you showed some sketches you did? I can't seem to find it, I want to show my wife what you can see with a 100mm Tak.
I think you were commenting on someone buying an Altair Astro refractor.
Thank you,
Martin.
-
Hi Martin,
Gosh, I'm struggling to remember which post it was as I've posted so much lately. What i can do though is send you some images of the sketches I've made using the FC100DC. The chances are the pics you're looking for will be among the images I send. I'm mainly interested in lunar and planetary these days but I've also made quite a number of deep sky sketches too, so I'll send you a mix.
Kind regards,
Mike
-
-
Hi Mike,
I just wondered why you have your scope on an AZ4 and not a Vixen porta II. I'm having a bit of a scare from mine and I wondered how long it took you to track planets without getting frustrated. Don't you feel the need for a bit of slow motion? Did you cut your teeth on a mount with slowmo and then learn to live without them?
Thanks for all your help.
Dominic
ps I'm not sure it's the done thing to bother other members personally. Please put me straight if I shouldn't really be doing this.
-
Hi Dominic,
First of all, I'm really quite happy to be contacted this way, and you're not bothering me! ☺
I would prefer slow motion controls on an altazimuth mount and have even considered designing something simple that can be added to my AZ4. I might one day get round to doing it! When Vixen first brought out the Porta Mount I bought one as did several other local astronomers. At the time I was using a Televue NP101, which is by no means an unwieldy scope, yet the Porta couldn't hold it steady enough. I tried everything, from ensuring all its parts were secure and tight, including its mechanics. I even tried a better tripod, but to no avail. Each time i touched the scope, or a breeze blew on it, the mount vibrated like a tuning fork. After a year or so I sold it. Interestingly, the other local lads also sold their Porta mounts because of the same reason. When the Porta ll was released, one of the lads bought one, but the same problem remained. He then tried some other similar design, though not Vixen, yet it too was no better.
By comparison the AZ4 was much more solid and once properly adjusted for tension, can be used at reasonably high powers with just a gentle touch. I would definitely prefer slow motion controls but not at the expense of solidity. Unfortunately, most AZ mounts either don't use slow motion drives or are too heavy, some needing counterweights, which kind of defeats the object of an easy to carry grab and go mount.
If you have a Porta Mount and it doesn't bounce around, then don't let what I've said influence you. For me, the Porta took too long to settle down, 6 seconds or more, and was easily set in motion again by either an accidental touch or a gentle breeze. I generally use my AZ4 as a grab and go set-up, or for when I feel like low power sweeping around. Last year however, I was unable to get Mars from my observatory and so had to use the AZ4, yet I managed track the planet and powers approaching X300 while sketching, without much of an issue.
Often I will use my Vixen Great Polaris equatorial, which is mounted on a permanent pier, for high power lunar and planetary observing. It has slow motion drives! ☺☺☺
When I first started out in astronomy at the age of 18, there was no where near the number of available mounts and scopes as there are today. As a consequence most observers, unless they had great wealth, had to make do and mend, often constructing their own mounts. To some extent i suppose i still a bit of a dinosaur in this regard, and am happy with simple things. Today I have the two mounts mentioned above and one scope that performs well on most things, so I'm quite content. Images attached! ?
I hope this answers your questions Dominic, but you can ask anytime.
Kind regards Mike
-