Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

harry page

Members
  • Posts

    1,492
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by harry page

  1. Hi

    I Know this topic is a year old but I also had this problem with my ODK10 and cant blame orion optics this time it turned out to be the adaptor on my sx filter wheel

    was causing the problem - bit of black paint and all is well.

    Never had this problem with all my other scopes - must be down to the optic configeration off the scope

    I would have gone mad looking for the problem and cure - so Thanks you SGL and all you great people

    Thanks

    Harry

    • Like 2
  2. Hi

    These only create 1 com port each hence 2 required for the mesu and cloudwather

    The mini pc connects by wifi to these , I also have a Pegasus Astro Ultimate Powerbox v3 attached to that to run everthing else power wise

    they are only for connecting the mini pc by wifi to the 2 com ports

    Harry

    • Like 1
  3. uwr.thumb.jpg.e0ef1f2ef325d2dee2f9aab841f96fd1.jpgHi

    This may be off interest to some

    I have gone down the route of a mini pc mounted on the scope to keep the cables down and the usb3 cables short as well

    but my mesu 200 is run by a serial port as well as my cloud watcher - you could argue that its only 1 more cable down , but who wants a easy life :)

    I found these online usr w610 and took a punt , happy to say they work , does require a software driver to emulate a com port - but so far so good

    Now have wirless everthing - well except the power cable

    cheers

    Harry

     

     

    • Like 1
  4. Hi

    not done as much imaging as I wanted to in the last year ( long story ) but managed a few hours on this to add to last years stuff

    taken with tak 106ed and a sx56 camera on the old faithfull mesu 200

    had to beat the data to death and have lost some star colour and needs a redo , but spent hours doing this :)

    dragging colour from the orange goo is always a struggle as orion is low in the sky and perhapes a bit overdone , but the draw is too much 😍

    Always more data required

    high res version here https://harrysastroshed.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/fin-orionfull.jpg

    Thanks

    Harry

     

     

     

    fin-orion-1000.jpg

    • Like 11
  5. Hi

    Been a while since I have posted anything ( too much work not enough play )

    I Have this data for a while now and only just got round to processing it , M101 is one of those targets that is harder than you first think.

    Also in the field is ngc5474 which I am happy with - got more detail than I have managed before :)

    Its not perfect , but what is :)

    It consists of about 8hrs of Lum and 8hrs of RGB all taken in 5m in subs through a ag12 and processed in pixinsight

    Thanks for looking

     

    Harry

     

     

    m101-full.jpg

    Image05_Annotated.jpg

    Image05_clone.jpg

    • Like 12
  6. 42 minutes ago, Tom OD said:

    That’s a huge difference. Without reading I would have thought this was a single frame verse 5-10 frame stack comparison 

    Can’t wait to get it up and running. 
    Tom 

    Hi

    with testing on darks etc I have found so far its very quiet :)

    With the qhy there is a " usb speed " slider in the driver which when adjusted gives a way off reducing the horizontal lines , in fact I have none

    do not know if there is a option with the Atik ?

    Harry

  7. Hi

    The build quality looks very good indeed , I have the qhy600 and perhapes does not look as pretty :)

    Anyway I Have only had a very quick go at some Ha ( 1 sub ) as the spec seemed to show a much better response and my intial comparison with my old sx h35 looks very

    promising indeed  both the crops down below are 10min subs and the imx455 chip is clearly way in the lead

    looking forward to imaging with this chip

    I will not be throwing away my ccds but they may be getting less use

    Harry

    qhy ha.jpg

    m101_600sec_1x1_Ha_0008.jpg

    • Like 2
  8. 58 minutes ago, josefk said:

    Thanks everyone for the welcome. 

    Hi Harry - my "dark sky" site is Burghley Park. Its not exactly dark but it's very close by and not soooo bad especially from the point of view of there being no nearby local light sources.

    Cheers

    Hi

    My observatory is in the back garden , I just have to cope with all the light pollution and tend to image a lot as visual stuff is hard

    in the orange goo :)

    Harry

  9. Hi

    Here is my first every mosaic a 2 pane effort containing about 21hrs of data ( LRGB ) and taken over the last month or so

    taken with a tak106ed @F5 and using a SX trius 56

    As m42 is low down in the orange poo , I have to beat the data within a inch of its life - I may come back and try again , but my brain needs a rest

    the full res image is about 8000 x 4000 pixels

    Cheers

    Harry

     

    finorion.jpg

    • Like 15
  10. Hi

    As you have had a trial licence I am sure they will reply - For some reason thy have problems recieving emails from certain domains and then licences disapear in email land ca.

    I can assure you , that you will not be charged twice :).

    If want to send me a private email with you details I will make contact for you and make sure its sorted out for you

    Regards

    Harry Page

  11. Hi

    A bit off topic from my original post , but still related to lunatico

    They are running a processing contest , with high quality data provided by them.--https://lunaticoastro.com/imaging-contest-jan-2022/

    As you will see I will judging the entries, something I am looking forward to .

    It is open to anyone and offers excellent data to practice your skills on

    Look forward to seeing different offerings from you all

    regards

    Harry Page

  12. 4 minutes ago, tomato said:

    You certainly could if your filters are parfocal, so you don’t need to refocus each filter change, but I wonder how many folks have tried this approach?
     

    Your EFW would earn it’s keep!

    Hi

    This is what I do every time :) - make sure you focus with the Lum as thats the critical item - if the rgb is slightley off focus it will not matter

    but I use baader filters and they keep good focus between filters - make sure you refocus when the temp changes this has more of a affect

    Cheers

    Harry

  13. 24 minutes ago, ollypenrice said:

    Harry, you're back! I was just beginning to get worried about you and was on the point of dropping you a line. I am slowing down a bit for sure, though! 🤣

    Olly

    Been busy at work - which seems to take more out of me these days + daughter got married a short while ago  all seemed to leave me with little spare time.

    enough moaning , I will be back soon :)

     

    Harry

    • Like 1
      •  

    Hi

    I reckon it been nearly a year since I have taken a image -Jack has been a very dull boy 😁#

     

    So the other night I managed to get a few hours on Ic1396 - And how many stars in this area ( will let you count )

     

    capture details

    1) About 2hrs of lum and 2hrs of RGB all taken in 5min subs

    2) camera trius sx 56

    3) telescope Tak 106 at f5

     

    Just good to post a image

     

    Regards

     

    Harry Page

    lrgb5200.jpg

    • Like 9
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.