Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Catanonia

  1. Hi all, It has been a good 6 months since I have even opened up the observatory due to a new contract, but I am still encountering the same problem I had before. I have stripped everything down, checked and double checked. As you can see from the Blue image attached, I am getting really strange shadows on my images. I have stretched this image so that you can see it more clearly. I get this in LRGB images. Scope Newtonian 200mm F2.8 (F4 with ASA corrector) QHY9 Mono with QHY9 2inch LRGB Filters Scenerio This happens on all LRGB filters no matter what methods I use with flats It does not happen on Ha It has happened on 2 CCD's so is not camera related It happens in the same place not matter on the camera or train orientation. I have tried panel flats, sky flats, nothing seem to get rid of the problem. The scope is Cats Eye collimated to an inch of it's live. Dew shield in place and not. Checked for light leaks, but that would not explain it and would cause issues on HA. There is no LP filter in place. It is really doing my head in. The only things left that I can think of are LP filter is needed (but that is strange as it is the same pattern always) Flat taking method. I have created sky flats with 23,000 ADU and averaged. I have done light panel flats and nothing gets rid of it. On HA filters, no problems at all so I am stumped. On Red images, no so apparent, green more so and blue the worst. Light pollution ? Anyone ? Does anyone have any clues as to what is causing this ?
  2. Yes I saw it as well, was quite good un too Edit : Nope mine was about 9:20pm (15th Jan). Was to the just to the left of Orion at same height at Bettlejuice
  3. Quite common to do and thinking about doing it myself again. My OAG is a pain for my SuperNewt, so currently I am side by side with a refractor, but it weighs alot and needs an extra 5kg on the bar. So thinking about this setup, but will introduce flex causing guidance issues. Luckily I am @ F2.8 so can get away with short exposures. But normally people move away from the fract on top because of flex.
  4. Heard the news last night and although we all knew it was going to happen one of these years, I was still shocked and saddened when it happened. If only everyone could have 1% of the inspiration and presence of the late Sir Patrick, then the world would be a much better place. So sadly missed, such devotion to the amatuer cause and from all accounts, there for everyone. My only regret is that I never got to meet the great man. RIP Sir Patrick, the next SuperNova should be named after him. Cat
  5. Using ST4 guiding with QHY5 via PHD. Locks are tight and scope is balanced. Will try adjusting the settings in PHD as mentioned. As for guide rate in handset, never seen it other than tracking type which is set to sidereal Thanks all, baffling.
  6. I wonder if someone can set my mind at ease as this issue is completely baffling me. I have recently stripped down my NEQ6Pro mount and now I am struggling to get PHD to work and I am afriad it is something I have done. Here is a breif description of the issue. 1. Polar aligned, but not drifted. As precise as I could get it. 2. WO66 only on the mount with QHY9 and QHY5 OAG 3. Sidereal tracking on the mount. 4. I cannot get PHD to calibrate, it goes to about 60+ west calibration and fails with star has not moved enough. 5. If I switch of tracking on the mount, the star does move across the PHD screen so the mount is doing something. Now for the wierd bit. 6. I can guide for nearly 5 minutes with the mount only and no PHD. Now I now the WO66 is a widefield and stars will not move much in its FOV, but this is silly. I have used PHD and this scope before. Surely I have not accidently got perfect polar alignment and drift ??? I thought PHD would "move" the star to ensure calibration, but it refuses to do anything as the star stays perfectly still. Thoughout the whole night (unguided) M31 barely drifted across the screen !!!! HELP !!! Is there something wrong with PHD ?
  7. Thanks all, it has been a tough few months, Still quite a bit to iron out, got really frustrated last night so gave up.
  8. Hi all again, been away for an age what with losing my job, problems with wifes health, retail park being built behind my garden and above all a broken CCD and mount all in the last 4 months. I have missed all of the good skies we have had recently, but eventually I have sorted out a few things. 1. CCD now, eventually, refurbished from China and working. 2. NEQ6Pro has been stripped and rebuilt by myself 3. Wife is better 4. Retail Park, been a busy campaigner and even ran for towm council to get the points across. Looking like it will be rejected on traffic, but it will go on for years 5. Job, lost my job, time to move on. Good news is that I am now contracting and potentially earning 2x as much in a very exclusive market. So eventually after all of the stripping, re-calibratting, re-laerning of how it all works (amazing how much you forget if you don't play) I managed to get 4 x 10 minutes HA of the Wizard Nebula NGC 7380 to test the refurbed kit out. I was hoping for a full night, but the clouds came in against the BBC forecast. Amazing how things never change eh SO on my SuperNewt 800m @ F2.8 with a QHY9M CCD in Ha 8nm. 4 x 10 minutes roughly processed to an image. Nice to be back in the saddle again, although with my contract work, doubt how much time I willl be able to devote to astro now. Here she is, be gentle, it has been MONTHS sine I last played. Cat
  9. WO Flattener II is the one, but they are as rare as hens teeth.
  10. mmm, so would an 8nm Ha filter be ok at F2.8 assuming it is a good make ?
  11. I am finding that the 8nm Ha filter I have has no real advantages on the F2.8 compared to the F7 or F5.6 scopes I used to use it on.
  12. I was advised sometime ago that you should have a business card gap between the primary and the mirror clips. Well I have come to the conclusion that this is wrong, totally. Well if you are using a GSO type cell. If you don't clamp the mirror, then it will shift and alter the colimation as the scope tilts from horizontal to vertical. Just put some logical thinking behind it and it is obvious, well not to me at the time. I understand why it was said, mirror pinching, but as long as you don't "clamp" down on the primary, it won't shift and affect your colimation. Tales of the F2.8 world, brought to you by an extremely frustrated Cat
  13. Not sure where that came from and certainly wasn't my point. Put simply, things that are in regular supply do not fetch as much as those that are not. Also as Bizibilder says, supply and demand. Sometimes I hate the attitude of "some" people on this forum.
  14. The is a misconception that astro gear will retain it's value. Just not the case with the common stuff such as 200p and the like. They are everywhere to buy new, so 2nd prices will reflect that. That said, less common stuff such as WO66 and the like will get higher prices, especialy if they are discontinued. I have a WO66 and a rare WO Flatener Mark II and I wonder how much they would go for, especially seeing I haven't used them for nearly a year.
  15. Spiral galaxies should not exist as the stars on the outside of the galaxy revolve at the same rate as the inner stars. Physically this should not happen due to gravity. So the theory is that dark matter is the spread out matter in the galaxy to balance the mass of the galaxy. Surely, a more simplier approach is that our interpretation of Gravity at large distances is well WRONG ? Let us not ov er complicate things,thing logically ? Or Dark Matter is the interaction or clashing of parallel universes ? Thoughts ?
  16. I have always wondered about entropy and the energy moving to chaos and disorder. Ok so where does the energy go to ? It can't just disappear can it now according to physics ? Yet the universe is expanding at an ever increasing rate, we put this to Einstiens mistake of the cosmological constant, now effectively renamed Dark Enerygy (he was actually right) HOW ABOUT THIS. 1. Energy in its sense we know it disipates to nothing, ie so thin we can't measure or see it and it has been happening since time began. 2. Over time this IS Dark Energy, the disipated "real measurable energy" we no longer can measure or see 3. This dark energy is what causes vacuums to expand and hence the universe to ever expand at an increasing rate. Put simply, Dark Energy is the energy we can no longer measure due to its disipation, and adds to the expansion rate ? The rantings of a loony ? Thoughts ?
  17. Watching a video about globular clusters and how old they are, relics of the universe, but in our and other galaxies. Recent descoveries show that new stars are forming in them now, unheard off. What is the bet that globular clusters turn out to be satellite galaxies with mini black holes ? One could say they were older galaxies captured by the major galaxy which would explain a lot. Thought for the day ?
  18. Having very similar problems with my corrector / reducer and newtonian running from F4 to F2.8 I found that my CCD was not level to the CCD case. I used digital venier calipers and found a 0.5mm difference across the CCD chip. Also if you have now messed with the secondary, re-cats eye and check the secondary peep hole on the autocolimator (offest) as well as the primary one to ensure you have it spot on.
  19. Watch the clear skies appear now I have shipped my CCD back for fixing. Probably be without it for a month or more No doubt will be the best skies all year.
  20. Fantastic news and well done Nasa, such a brave and daring landing.
  21. Thanks all, the fight is on against the retail park and I have been rattling a lot of cages in the CC Anyways, back to stars Might try and find some time and re-process this properly. Thanks all.
  22. Ah not seen that post, very useful bit of kit. I am currently testing out a washer under one of the cover screws on my QHY9 mono. I now have an average variance of 0.1 mm instead of 0.5mm
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.