Jump to content



  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

48 Excellent

1 Follower

About redmoo

  • Rank
    Star Forming

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Warrington, North West England
  1. I think most people try and stay true to the colours that actually exist. Sure, you have light polltution filters etc, but most of the processing in PS is to try and get the colours back to where they were. One major exception to this is the narrowband images that you see, where each colour represents a different 'gas'. I mean, you could look at it that all the pictures taken on earth aren't really 'true' colours, as the lighting around them makes a huge difference (just look at the blue/black or white/gold dress thing that has been going around as of late). Are monochrome images more realist
  2. Another Warrington person! I'm not sure about the 550d, but I have the 1100d and no you can't. You can set it up to take lots of pictures which you can then turn into a video in PIPP (again, free software) and then process it that way. There is a HD video option if you pay for APT, but I can't get that to work properly. What scope are you using?
  3. Hey! What software are you using to capture? I personally use Sharpcap, and with that, you can usually adjust the gain on the camera. Also, increasing the FPS usually lowers the brightness too. Im not a planetary person, but someone will be along soon to give you proper advice as to the exact settings that you need! Good luck
  4. Did you just remove the back filter and leave the front one in place or did you remove both? If you only removed the back one, you don't need the IR/UV cut as you have effectively left that in the camera already. I only use my camera for AP, so can't comment on the autofocus stuff!
  5. The advantage of using a higher ISO is that you can do shorter subs to get to the same saturation. This then gives you more subs to play with and reduces the chances that you lose a sub due to tracking errors etc. I'm no expert in this, just re iterating information that I have read on here and I have found it works for me.
  6. Yeah, I got out and was cloud dodging to get Jupiter a few nights ago, but was horrible seeing. As for targets, I am going to have another go at the horsehead in Ha (due to the moon). I have got it before, but my scope was way out of collimation. Just re did it last night so hopefully it will last a day!
  7. I guess it depends on the filters that you are using and the light pollution type that is in your area. The new LED lights are a nightmare for LRGB imaging. Some of the RGB filters have a gap between the red and the green filters to drop out the 589 line from sodium lamps. Don't know what you would do about lum though!
  8. When you use a mono camera, you need some sort of filter in there, be it an LRGB set or a narrowband set. These filter out the LP on their own as each filter will only let through a certain bandwidth of light. That is next on my list. Which camera did you go for?
  9. I managed to get a second hand 1100D on ebay for 99 pound. It didnt have a lens, but I didn''t need one! I modded it myself and now getting used to taking pics. It can be done, and then if you decide to go further you can always go down the CCD route. I would never of thought of trying to mod it myself if it was worth a lot of money, but at less than 100 pound, was worth a punt and it worked (although not a walk in the park!) Good luck
  10. First tip would be start saving for a guiding solution! That will be where you want to be going next. I use an 1100d, and stick to iso 1600 most of the time. Biggest problem with DSO photography is that it costs so damn much! You always want that next bit of gear.....and chances are it will be cloudy....FOREVER (at least that's how it seems to me) Get used to getting pics. Depending on your polar align, I think you can get upto 5 mins unguided, although most people cap out at ~2 mins. Galaxies are pretty faint, so you might be able to get a few of the brigher ones (andromeda, M81 etc) but aft
  11. Hi there and welcome to SGL! That is pretty normal for deep sky images. A things that helped me when starting out:- Use a higher ISO:- I think most people suggest either 800 or 1600. I have the 1100d and find that 1600 works really well. Shoot flat frames:- This will sort out the gradient that you are seeing. Flat frames are basically a baseline picture for your imaging train. You shoot a flat white light source (there are many different ways of doing this) and then DeepSkyStacker creates a 'flat' light image and then processes these differences out of your actual images. It will also take car
  12. Which size LP filter did you buy? I had a similar issue recently with a 2" filter. Needed a different T ring connector for the camera (T ring to 2" connector) and the LP filter fitted on the end of that. There are probably other ways to do it, but this one seems the simplest.
  13. Another option for focussing would be a bahtinov mask. Works wonders! You can either buy one or make your own.
  14. As mentioned above, it depends on what type of astrophotography you are going for. For deep sky objects (Nebulas and Galaxies), you need to do long exposures, and on an ALT/AZ mount, the rotation of the earth causes star trails. For this reason, you need a decent motorized EQ mount. AP is a slippery, expensive slope. But if you do decide to take the plunge, go for a decent mount first, and think of the future....because chances are, you will want to upgrade pretty soon!
  15. Just echoing this. The first time you get guiding to work, the first time you take a picture or see a planet. The first time the wife says 'Why don't you get another telescope'......although I might of dreamt that last one.
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.