Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Aidan

Members
  • Posts

    329
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Aidan

  1. Hi Roland,

    Sorry for the lack of response... been kinda busy!    I eventually ended up sending the scope back to AA.  I didn't find out exactly what the problem was, they just replaced it.   New one is spot on.  I wouldn't be deterred by my experience..  You don't often hear folks having problems with AA scopes - and in my experience probelms are very quickly dealt with.

    • Like 1
  2. I had planned on doing a mosaic of the Cygnus loop, but for whatever reason, it didnt work out.. Horizontal panels lined up, but could not get them lined up on the vertical plain.. Probably not enough overlap. Ill revisit again at some point.

    Went for the Witches Broom.. Overall, it came out quite nicely. Really liking the OSC with the Quadband Filter!

    Details:
    SW Esprit 100
    SW EQ6-R Pro Mount (guided)
    ZWO ASI071 OSC
    Altair Astro Quadband Filter
    21 x 300s Exposures (Total = 1hr 45min)
    Processing - PI and PS

    Resize.jpg

    • Like 21
  3. Have you listened to the Podcast from the BBC called 13 minutes to the moon?

    If you haven’t, I can’t recommend it enough.  It is very good and comes in 13 x 45min episodes...  Some amazing detail and interviews with both those who were I. The foreground and the folks who worked behind the scenes.

     

  4. I've got an EQ-6 R pro which i control via EQmod.

    I want to test a few things..  How can i get the mount to move if its not actually being guided?     The idea is, i want to slew the mount on its RA axis so the  counterweights are horizontal, start the mount tracking until the mounts are back in the vertical position.. or there abouts.  

    I thought it might have been a case of just hitting the Star/Moon/Sun icon in EQMod to start it off, but i'm not seeing much movement!

  5. I took the risk with the 071 as i knew that if it didnt work out, its resale value would be quite high..  So that mitigated a bit.   My skies are about Bortle 6..  And i have a street light about 10ft away!   Which is about 90 degrees off to the left when imaging the veil.   So certainly not ideal by any means

    • Like 1
  6. I'm a bit pleased at the moment!

    Considering this was first light with my new Esprit 100... I i didnt expect to be actually imaging last night.. Just testing and adjusting was all i thought i would achieve.

    The scope setup worked like a charm from the outset.. Even the spacing for the flattener was perfect.. Never seen CCD Inspector return such good figures!

    Also, it i had a Quadband 2" filter in the image train... I really did think i was pushing my luck, but things seemed to have worked out nicely.

    16 x 300s Subs
    Stacked in PI - BPP with Darks & Flats
    Processed in PI and finished on in PS

    Cant wait to see how it improves with some more subs

    light_BINNING_1_integration_ABE.jpg

    • Like 26
  7. 3 hours ago, Grierson said:

    Sorry about the above. Just wondered what significant improvement you are keen to achieve between the 100 and the 120. I keep thinking about an 80 to 120 upgrade but the more I read I seem never to get beyond the thinking stage.

    Main thing is field of view.   I dont envisage any improvement from a general quality perspective... for the money, its hard to beat the Esprit range IMO...hence the 2nd one to my arsenal!!

  8. 4 hours ago, Hallingskies said:

    How did you get the coarse focus knob off so that you could fit your focus motor?

    lt’s not obvious on mine.

    To get the knob off,  Look at the knob, the first hole in the focuser housing where the shaft is... turn the focus knob slowly, you'll see a grub screw appear in the hole, then just a case of loosening it for the knob to come off. 

    Not the exact same focuser, but its the hole circled where the grub screw is

     

    Equinox_crayford_focus_tension_adjustmant.jpg

  9. Perhaps consider one of these..

    https://pegasusastro.com/products/eqdir/

    One cable from the box to the mount the rest is Bluetooth.  Been using this method for the past year, has never let me down.  I e used it with my laptop about 15m away.

    Once setup, with ASCOM and Eqmod loaded, was just a case of using the HEQ5/EQ6 driver and everything connected.. PHD2, CdC, SGP etc.

     

    AC3A4AD2-CDE5-4143-A519-D64E1895DDA6.jpeg

    F5902BB8-1CD0-4623-85F1-16932BD5F12C.jpeg

  10. Lol, it’s normally spotless!   

    I’ve managed to find pretty much every usb cable at the length I need to reduce having to cope with extra, dew bands are cut to length so each scope has its own loom and cans easily swap the boxes between them without disturbing things too much.  With the PC being 12v as well, it leaves me with a single cable to the mount which is a 12v power cable.  Access to the pc is via Remote Desktop 

  11. I’ve been wanting an Esprit 100 for a while now, it fits nicely between my Esprit 120 and 70mm Quad.

    It arrived yesterday, so got to it this morning getting it all ready.   Pegasus Autofocuser fitted..  The new couplers they supply are so much better than the flexi type they used to use.  It’s now rock solid and on first test, very little backlash... but, time will tell.

    I run the Pegasus UPB along with a mini pc on my rig,  Some £3 strips of L profile aluminium drilled and countersunk mount on the top of the tube rings and give a great platform for the UPB and mini PC..  It’s as good as anything you can buy for a lot more money and only a few grams in weight.

    The two units attach with Velcro so they can be shifted between my scopes.  Just waiting on Mr Amazon to deliver some USB cables and dc power splitter...  still amazes me that you can order at 9pm and have it delivered the next day!

     

    A3E769EF-B57A-4932-B303-D47E21B05C3E.jpeg

    79BD4371-C7EB-4E15-8A79-1E6E7292BF04.jpeg

    1F6A4ACD-B6D5-49D3-8EB1-77E416F70D44.jpeg

    469A284B-CC44-447F-AD73-28CC773B775E.jpeg

    • Like 4
  12. The Esprit 100 arrived yesterday, what a lovely scope!  Also got the suggested adaptor and it works great!   I wonder how many others struggled with this and ended up buying an in line filter draw/slide?

    Heres a few pictures which might assist someone in the future.  The adaptor is the one on the scope side of the flattener

     

    E7101F05-A1AD-42EB-B838-491B2A951976.jpeg

    B1457522-3AA3-44C4-A659-31E794FFC863.jpeg

    633E105D-4A76-4BD7-B73C-5D0B7E5734DF.jpeg

    C374E0D5-A388-4771-98F1-EBF34019F4E3.jpeg

    2FFAC138-A5AA-4ADD-B33C-86B2B255ED67.jpeg

  13. HI All,

    Do you own a SW Esprit 100 scope.. with the dedicated flattner?    If you do, can you answer me a question please?

    I have its bigger brother - the Esprit 120 with the flattener.  With it i am able to screw a 2" filter inside the adaptor which then connects to the image train.   Very handy indeed.  

    Is it the same for the Esprit 100?    There is no mention in the online manual - but things like this can sometimes be omitted by accident..

    The Esprit 100 would fit perfecting between my other two scopes, but unless i can get a 2" filter to work without a filter wheel then it might be a deal breaker.

    Rgds
    Aidan

  14. I’m sort of half and half.  I thrive on the challenge of setting up, configuring and capturing my own images from my back garden and then processing it... but nights are limited and because I have to setup and tear down every session, consistently getting all components singing at the same time is never a gimmie.

    Never really considered it, but having the ability to capture images of my choice and then processing does have some appeal to me..  The options I have looked at were too expensive for me.

    • Like 1
  15. Having done a lot of reading with regards to OSC cameras, i have narrowed it down to two cameras which take my fancy and by my calcuations the most suitable for my scope (f7 @ 840mm) which

    The 294 gives me a pixel scale of 1.14
    The 071 gives me a pixel scale of 1.17

    What i am finding difficult is why i should chose one over the other..   With £400 difference between the two cameras, is the 071 really worth the extra money?    From all my reading it seems to be a 50/50 split.

    Is the 071 the better bet?  Or, do i save some £££ and just get the 294?

    Would really appreciate your comments or experiences.

  16. I quite fancy trying a OSC.   I have a ZWO ASI 1600 mono which overall i think is a great camera.     I know the 1600MC Pro OSC is now discontinued, but there are still a few available.    

    There are a few others by ZWO in the OSC range, but i dont know too much about them..  

    What is the alternative, and is it better and perhaps worth spending a bit more?

    Rgds

    Aidan

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.