Jump to content

Roy Challen

Members
  • Posts

    1,748
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Roy Challen

  1. 8 hours ago, nephilim said:

     

    When I start with my cynicism regarding the daily comi......erm I mean  newspapers & their love of disregarding actual science fact over paper sales, my friends start to lose interest, when I continue with the actual real distance between these planets, my friends start to yawn, as soon as the words 'arc seconds' leave my mouth, my friends eyes glaze over, I've lost their interest completely & that's pretty much where the discussion ends.

    Tell 'em what they want to hear. Great conjunctions are portents of significant events, this one tells us that a saviour will soon appear to deliver us from the pandemic. When the vaccine finally appears, you can say to your friends: "see, I told you so!"

    😉

    • Haha 3
  2. 47 minutes ago, F15Rules said:

     

    I really don't understand why modern mount makers like Skywatcher don't just make a simple design change to allow their manual equatorials to convert to altaz mode..? The cost would be minimal and yet you'd have two mounts for the price of one🤔??

    Lovely scope Dave.

    It's not just Skywatcher, they're all like that. Even my lovely Tak mount is EQ only. The mount that came with the Prinz 660 I bought from you is EQ/Alt-Az, I fettled it to fit on a Horizon tripod, it works nicely as a grab and go but the 660 is a bit long for it really.

    • Like 1
  3. 13 hours ago, andrew s said:

    Like  the OP, it has bilpped into existance and will then disappear without trace.

    Regards Andrew 

    Yes, possibly. But it will take so long to do whatever it's going to do that we will never know. So maybe there will be a trace, it's just that we won't be around to see it. That, I think, is the sad part of it all.

    • Like 2
  4. This may be a fake advert, @John reported a very similar one recently. The true value of this scope is way higher than the starting bid. The text is almost word for word the same as in the link below. The pictures are the same.

    https://www.apm-telescopes.de/en/offers--lists/secondhand/apochromatical-refractors-2-lens-opt.-tube.html

    It may also be genuine...but I doubt it. Nope, it's fake, I'm sure of it. I deleted my ebay account only the other day, so I'm unable to report it. If someone else would be so kind...

    • Like 2
  5. 14 hours ago, wuthton said:

    I'm going to politely disagree. Natural selection by it's very nature means that the next generation will be faster, more intelligent and disease resistant with better senses of sight, smell and taste. The direct opposite of the second law. 

    This definitely doesn't apply to humans.

  6. A lovely setup Dave! I don't have any fresh photos of mine, but here's a link to a thread I started when I first got my Tak mount.

    Everything is clean and working now (has been for ages actually), except for the LCD screen on the control box. I also found a more suitable counterweight. I did refit the original black dew shield though as it better matches the rest of the components.

    My garden looked tidier back then too😁

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  7. On 08/11/2020 at 13:13, RodAstro said:

     

    Yep I love the Zeiss Orthos I have the full set and two of each for the bino head and a 40mm and a 63mm Zeiss huygens that is fantastic. 

    I had a few CZJ orthos a little while back, and have to say that they were the best eyepieces I've used in any telescope. And I still have a 25mm Zeiss Huygens, which is a fantastic ep in my f/16 (one of Dave's old scopes!).

    • Like 2
  8. 3 hours ago, Peter Drew said:

    My oldest telescope is a 3" brass refractor by Davis of Cheltenham, circa late 1700's.

    You win!

    I think my eyes are the oldest astro equipment I have, they're 45 in a couple of weeks.

    My Skylight is based on a Prinz 660, so it could be older, but I can't prove it, and my Tak mount is probably mid/late 80s.

    • Like 2
  9. 46 minutes ago, Zermelo said:

    The 2012 transit of Venus, because I won't see another.

    It was 2004 for me, 2012 was clouded out where I was.

    Neowise would definitely be a recent highlight.

    Number one though, the first time going to a truly, truly dark sky although that wasn't really an event, it felt like one though!

     

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  10. Like several have already said, 2003 was a vintage Mars year. That opposition was the reason I got my first telescope, a department store special - it was a Bushnell I recall. The optics weren't that bad really, but the mount was. However, I didn't know any better, and I still enjoyed the view. In the intervening years, the scopes I had were decent, but lacking in aperture and f/l, and between 2016 and this year I didn't do much observing. So the best view I've had was last Saturday, through my 100 RS.

    The funny thing is I am far more willing to get up at a very unsociable time in order to get a good view now, than I was 17 years ago!

    • Like 1
  11. 20 minutes ago, Stu said:

     

    Or, how about the new StellarLyra 6” Classical Cassegrain? This would avoid the cool down issues of a mak and should give great views.

    These really are causing a stir, so much so that even I, a long f/l refractor diehard, am seriously tempted. I just need to find something I own that worth enough to sell!

  12. Hi John,

    It does have foil spacers but they don't appear to have moved relative to each other. It was only the flint lens that looked like it had moved as the witness marks from the spacers were about 20-30 degrees offset. Interestingly, on Saturday morning I looked at Mars through both the Skylight and the Tal, and other than the difference in brightness, the views were very similar. I forgot to star test though🤦‍♂️

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.