Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

Lee_P

Members
  • Posts

    1,129
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Lee_P

  1. They're both great. I'll go against the grain and say I prefer the second one. The reduced stars make it easier to see the faint extremities of the galaxy, to my eyes at least!
  2. I'm very happy to be placed near those winning two images -- they're incredible!
  3. @powerlord is wise! To answer the OP, I'd say that astrophotography is a hobby, and a hobby should be fun. So, if you're not enjoying the mini PC and NINA, maybe it's a sign that you should try an ASIAIR. Buying one second-hand so that you can sell it on for minimal loss if you don't get on with it is a good call.
  4. A brilliant first image, congratulations!
  5. I just need a few more clear nights and then I'll have enough data to produce two images using these Askar filters. I'll post a link to my tests in the Members' Reviews section when it's all done
  6. Hi SGL, I'm posting this on behalf of a friend. He's just bought a used RedCat 51 and has taken some test shots using a Canon ESO 700D on a Star Adventurer. The stars look like teardrops, and he says it's the same regardless of exposure length. He's confident that the images he's taken are in focus. Here's an example image, and the result after I ran it through PixInsight's AberrationInspector. My initial thought is coma and / or sensor tilt, but I'd appreciate the opinion of anyone more clued up on this particular topic!
  7. I just came across this custom astrophotography planner: https://digitalstars.wordpress.com/2019/05/05/custom-digital-editions-of-the-astrophotography-planner-now-available/ Looks pretty good. I'm wondering, has anyone ordered one and can comment on the quality? Or, what else do people use to plan their imaging targets as efficiently as possible?
  8. Thanks, to be honest I was surprised it came out so well considering it's just 10 hours. It's weird how this f7.7 'scope feels like it gets decent signal faster than my previous f5.6 when it should be half the speed (before binning).
  9. Could be an interesting SGL imaging competition idea, maybe suggest it to the mods? 😛
  10. I always thought that my kitted out Askar FRA400 looked pretty badass, and I had it sitting on a shelf by my desk when not in use. Now my Askar 130PHQ has the astrophotography kit, but is too heavy for the shelf!
  11. I think that the processing is handled by the ASIAIR itself, with your iPad simply being used to interface with the ASIAIR.
  12. Good question. First off, I'm using an APS-C sensor, and the telescope should in theory be able to handle much larger. Alas, I can only test with what I have... But to answer your question, the few images I've seen from other Askar 130PHQ telescopes all seem to be good to the edges of the frame. Also, given the high quality of everything else, I kinda expect the optical quality to be consistently good across all these telescopes. Plus they're not cheap! So, I think the likelihood of all the scopes giving round stars to be high, although I can't say for sure. I have a really good Askar FRA400, but apparently there are some lemons out there. I expect Askar's quality control to be tighter on the 130PHQ though.
  13. Hi SGL, I've just published a review of my new telescope, an Askar 130PHQ. I put quite a lot of time into it, so I hope it's of use to anyone considering buying one. Click here for the review.
  14. Ooh that's a new one. Very nice!
  15. I know right, the weather's been really awful lately. Hence me stopping with just 10 hours of data!
  16. The first broadband target for my new Askar 130PHQ! This was just 10 hours of integration time from a Bortle 8 city centre using a ZWO ASI2600MC-Pro camera. No filters. I like M31 photos with dark dusty lanes, so tried to make those quite contrasty. More image details on my website here. * November 2022 * Bristol, UK (Bortle 8 ) * Telescope: Askar 130PHQ Flatfield Astrograph * Camera: ZWO ASI 2600MC-PRO * Filter: None * Mount: Sky-Watcher EQ6-R PRO * Guide: William Optics 50mm Guidescope with 1.25″ RotoLock; ZWO ASI 120MM Mini * Control: ASIAIR Plus * Software: PixInsight, Lightroom * 300 x 120 seconds Total integration time: 10 hours By Lee Pullen
  17. +1 for tracing panels from Amazon, or if you want to go down the DIY route then this is an option.
  18. I reviewed that telescope and liked it.
  19. I'm looking forward to testing the Askar 3nm versus the Optolong L-Ultimate. Askar are currently out of stock, but they'll send me one when they get more in. Fingers crossed it won't be too long a wait!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.