Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

wulliam

Members
  • Posts

    89
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by wulliam

  1. This is fantastic - what a great idea! Thanks very much
  2. I'm just starting out and so my collection doesn't come close to rivalling many on here. But here it is nonetheless: My Tal plossls are there with gaps in the hope of getting a 10mm and 25mm to match. Also a space for possibly another Barlow. Other than that a modded webcam, my new 9x50 finderscope, and a moon filter. Now I just need the clouds to clear - off work for the next week but the weather is grim
  3. Absolutely breathtaking - wow! Thanks for sharing it!
  4. I've been around for about six weeks or so and am in awe of both the knowledge and the generosity of so many here - it's a wonderful forum. One possible idea for improving what is already great would be to have sections for different scopes. For instance, I've just bought a 130P-DS - it would be great to have a section just for that where folk with the same OTA can discuss matters specific to them. However, I realise that there are a lot of scopes out there and that this would be a lot of work to set up... I look forward to learning much more over the months ahead
  5. Purdo - if I make any progress I'll post about it separately. As you say lets end this diversion here and enjoy some more stunning images from those who know what they're doing!
  6. Thanks - that's very helpful!
  7. There are some wonderful images on this thread - very inspiring ...can I just ask a quick question? I'm about to buy a 2nd hand EQ5 and was planning to buy a separate 150P-DS (new)...the idea being that it'd be good for visuals whilst I learn the basics and could then be upgraded for imaging if I ever go down that route - I'd certainly like to try. If I'm right the EQ5 would handle the weight of the 150 plus camera. Can someone explain what advantage the 130P-DS has over the 150P-DS. Apart from being slightly cheaper I, as a complete novice, would have thought that the greater aperture on the 150 would have been a good thing? Or is that the 130 weighs even less than the 150 and so the EQ5 would be as stable as possible? I hope the question makes sense. Thanks for reading!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.