Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_2021_3.thumb.jpg.30e9b298c34c80517e8b443ce153fce3.jpg

Metalhead

Members
  • Content Count

    50
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

101 Excellent

1 Follower

About Metalhead

  • Rank
    Nebula

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/petetee/
  • Skype
    metalhead212399

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Interests
    Pkotography, Astronomy, Fishing, PC, Dartmoor
  • Location
    Torbay

Recent Profile Visitors

658 profile views
  1. I dont know if this has been asked before , but I wondered how or what got us all interested in astronomy? I personally was always being shown the constellations by my Dad from about 5 years old and have always remembered how he showed me how to find the pole star by following the two pointers in the big dipper. I got my first telescope (Tasco) when I was about 20 and had much pleasure with this for a few years. I lost interest for a while due to the fact that the 60mm Tasco was way too weak for me and I coudln't afford the 12 inch Reflector that I saw in magazines for ABOUT 3 YEARS WAGES
  2. Found this while interwebibng again..Like it lots
  3. Have you looked at an intervalometer ? You dont say what Camera you have But if its a DSLR thes things are made for most models , Look at this for an example ,,hope this helps http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Time-lapse-intervalometer-remote-timer-shutter-for-Canon-DSLR-500D-450D-Camera-/321239845011?pt=UK_Photography_DigitalCamAccess_RL&hash=item4acb630893#ht_2425wt_1319
  4. Thanks all for the praise , I have only been doing this stuff for a week or two. i was just wondering is this the best I can expect from my present set up? Not sure if investing in a CCD will improe the detail in these photo's or if I am pushing the Mak to its limits already? I would hate to waste money on an expensive CCD camera only to find that there is little or No improvement...any help would be appreciated ..Cheers Pete
  5. I am thinking of getting into webcam/CCD imaging and saw this. i wonder has anyone had any first hand expierience of this product? It seem to be too cheap to be any good , and I dont want to waste money as it is hard to come by !!!. I am also looking at a Celestron neximage5 which is a lot more expensive but has a proven track record.......Your thoughts on this would be appreciated Cheers Pete P.S I am using a Celestron 127 Mak with a Canon 650D at the moment http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Solar-System-CCD-Astronomy-Imaging-Photography-Set-/380827149668?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_3&hash=item58ab112564
  6. Morning all these are the best I could muster from yesterday evening just after dark Celestron 127 Mak, Canon 650D , around 30 sec to 1 min of Video converted to AVI then fed through Castrator and Registax 6
  7. Mornring all these were the best shots I managed yesterday evening just after dark ....Celestron 127 Mak ,Canon 650D , aroud 30 sec to 1 min of vid , converted to AVI then put thrugh Castrator and finaly Registax 6
  8. Went out in the garden last night for an hour as I had just done a 12 hour shif and was tired, so limited myself to a short session. One Question I would like to ask , is this the best results that I can expect from my Celestron 127 SLT and Canon 650D ? ( not that I am complaining at all ) it,s just that I see more detailed shots of Jupiter from others using the same scope , So I was wondering if I could get any more out of this set up or do I need a better Camera ?...Cheers all Pete
  9. Hi GUys , Had a go a "The Big Guy" tonight ....results were better than I had expected,,Even caught a Shadow on the disc (Ganymede?) data was from 30+ seconds of video from the Canon 650D and the 127SLT, fed this thru castrator and registax......Hope you like ...Cheers Pete Oh yeah and a close up of the Moon
  10. I had much the same problem until I went into manual mode and did some trial runs to find the best exposure, I finally got a decent image of Jupiter bt this was very small compared to the ones I have seen in tutorials on Youtube etc...and I could not get any detail out through registax only the two eqatorial bands and even these look very un-natural , Keep trying I must, Not sure if or how I can make the image bigger in Registax so that I can get more than 1 align point ont the image ???
  11. I shoot in RAW so the file size is usually about 22MB,,,but after processing in Photoshop , and depending on how you save your file (I save as Jpeg) the finished file you see on here could be anything between 400KB - 2MB or more
  12. This was one of a dozen or so single shots , Tried various ISO,s and exposure times , If we get another clear night this year I will try down the "Fast end" on the ISO 100 or 200 see how it works out. This was fed thru Photoshop CS6 just to tidy it up a bit ( Nothing too drastic) just a bit of clarity and Contrast enhancement
  13. First time out with the Celestron 127SLT Mak tonight, Quite impressed with the results for a first attempt Canon 650D attached 1/640 sec at ISO1600
  14. Just a reminder ,,,in case any were needed
  15. Hi again Have you ever looked up and thought " I wonder what that is ?" ...well wonder NO more ,,this should help you no end
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.