Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Welcome to Stargazers Lounge

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customise your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

  • Announcements

    sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_jupiter.jpg

     

skywatcher58gb

Advanced Members
  • Content count

    259
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

64 Excellent

2 Followers

About skywatcher58gb

  • Rank
    Star Forming
  • Birthday 05/08/50

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    North West Durham
  1. Hi Cuke and welcome to the forum In answer to your question on point 1, this would seem a decent scope for a beginner, reasonable aperture to see quite a range of objects visually. GoTo to find a good variety of subjects both planetary and deep sky. However point 2 as an instrument for photography it has limitations, you will be able to take the moon with a DSLR and planets using a webcam, because the weak point is the mount for taking deep sky objects with your DSLR as it is an alt alz configuration. This means that the tracking is a series of side ways and upward steps which is OK visually but not for photography, any images taken will have to be very short duration. To do DSLR photography properly especially on deep sky objects such as nebula and galaxies you would need an equatorial mount, this tracks the sky in an arc which compensates for what is called field rotation. It would be interesting to note if the images you have seen using this scope have been done by placing this tube assembly on an equatorial mount, I say this because the tube assembly itself 150mm at f5 is quite a decent imaging unit but placed on a more appropriate mount should yield good results. I would take time to investigate the scope and read up more about equatorial and alt az mounts before you make a final decision.
  2. Welcome Ewalks77 and a nice little discussion you have started. I have a Skywatcher Startravel 102, a Skywatcher Evostar 120 and both the Skywatcher EQ3-2 and HEQ5 mounts, these are the lighter duty and heavier duty equatorial mounts similar to the one you are considering. Having used the 120 on the EQ3-2 mount and although it works I find the mount a wee bit too near the knuckle for this size of scope, it works fine on the HEQ5. Have a look at the following post on the lounge; TAL 100RS or Evostar 120 ... that age-old discussion. If I were in your position I would also consider the TAL 100RS on an EQ5 mount, an optically good scope on a solid mount. I am not sure of the costs in dollars this would need to be checked out, also the equatorial mounts are not that difficult to use they just take a bit longer to get your head around. Whatever you decide enjoy the ride.
  3. I've never owned one of these scopes but have used other peoples, the one common theme is the poor red dot finder. I would personally replace with a standard red dot finder or for a bit extra money fit a Telrad, observing will be so much more enjoyable.
  4. You would have no problem mounting either scope on an EQ3-2, obviously the bigger the mount the more stable but the EQ3-2 isn't bad for stability. Also the mount is quite light to transport and second hand ones are always available, another good thing is these mounts can easily be stripped down and rebuilt / re-greased and adjusted and are pretty bomb proof. I sold one as a complete set up which I had motorised with a Helios150, after a while I missed the quick grab and go and so I got myself another second hand which I use with a Skywatcher ST102.
  5. Hi JOC and welcome, collimation and focusing are two different things. Collimation is the procedure to get the optical train in line, ie adjusting the primary mirror using three collimation screws and also adjusting the three secondary mirror screws, this will be done when using your laser collimator. Once collimation is complete and you want to focus on stars and planets the Bahtinov mask can be used, select a very bright star put the mask over the end of the scope and adjust until the three lines converge, then your scope is focused on the object. Remember to remove the mask, especially if you are imaging, I have taken countless photos of the Bahtinov mask. Happy viewing and clear skies. Dave
  6. Hi and welcome, there are various free programs that will show you what you can expect to see through various scopes, one that I like is called 12Dstring, the link is www.12dstring.me.uk. You can go to the drop down box for your scope ie Celestron and pick your model 70AZ, then pick from an assortment of eyepieces, the image you see is what can be achieved. However the images are colored which you will not see, also the clarity will vary depending on the seeing conditions, on 12Dstring the images shown are at the very best seeing conditions and the darkest skies, so don't expect to see exactly what is shown, as these are a guide only. Check it out, it is a bit of fun to play around with.
  7. You can always observe with an old fashioned planisphere, these are a basic way to get to grips with whats overhead on any day at any time. Good luck and enjoy.
  8. No problem with your scope or a pair of binoculars, however it is not a spectacular object. It looks like a grey smoke cloud, the best view I had was through a friends pair of 25X100 binoculars.
  9. Check out the following Dalby Forest campsite astronomy events http://www.northyorkmoors.org.uk/discover/dark-skies Dave
  10. Hi well done with the filter, I also have the Evostar 120 and have used the baader solar film on the small aperture on the push on lens cap. I wonder if making the filter full aperture as you have makes a difference to the viewing quality, I have enough film left to do this. I would be interested if anyone has done a comparison.
  11. As advised check the type of street lights that is polluting your sky, these filters only work on sodium (orange/yellow) type elements. If there are any new LED lights or other white lights they do not work. Dave
  12. Hi Moonshed, I have had a telrad fitted to my Meade LX90 8" SCT for about 3 years now with no problem. I do remove the telrad when the scope is stored and only screw it into position when observing. Maybe if the telrad were left on permanently it might have an effect on the self adhesive pads due to the additional weight. I would advise removing when not observing.
  13. Hi, it is marginally easier to align the finder during the day as your targets ie distant pylons, church spires etc don't move. At night stars, planets and the moon all traverse across your field of view and also with it being dark it is a little more difficult to see what you are doing. Either way good luck with the alignment.
  14. Hi Spillage, you might consider the Skywatcher EQ3-2 equitorial mount, these can be bought with manual hand drives or motor driven drives. The payload I understand is approx 7kg, also these are quite common on used equipment sites such as Astro Buysell. I acquired a second hand one and have fitted the RA drive, and am happy with it.
  15. Hi and welcome to the forum, there are two free programs that you might be interested in downloading for reference. One is Stellarium which is a sky atlas and will enable you to see what is visible at any time of the year plus loads of extra features, another is www.12dstring.me.uk/fov.htm, this program lets you see what your telescope will actually see by selecting an object from the drop down listIt has your scope listed and you choose which eyepiece you want use. Hope this helps Dave