Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_terminator_challenge_winners.thumb.jpg.6becf44442bc7105be59da91b2bee295.jpg

RichM63

Members
  • Content Count

    1,816
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RichM63

  1. Let it out to fly around a bit. If it sounds like a V1 pulse jet it is a hornet.
  2. Aye did ye ever hear the story about the auld empty Wasp Nest…..
  3. Well if he buys a Nikon he'll have no use for all those lovely L lenses, so I step in to save the day. ;)
  4. £1500 opens up a whole plethora of Canon body possibilities, especially when the S/H market is in play. My studied advice is that a NIKON D750 body could free up some decent L lenses that I may go for. Best, Rich
  5. WOW a DIY Obsy that you can live in! :)
  6. I love the quality of your pictures and as always this is no exception.
  7. Sweet. Same here about the memories.
  8. Ah yes, quite. My Zomei is 4 section and my Manfrotto 3 section.
  9. Check out the classified adds on here. DannyK is selling his Manfrotto for about £140 IIRC.
  10. I have both a Zomei Z818 and lately a Manfrotto 190XPROB. The Zomei is good and carries heavy DSLRs and lenses no problem. But the Manfrotto is great. Noticeably more rigid. The one thing I really don't like about the Zomei is the twist lock leg method, I've completely untwisted them on more than one occasion. (easily rebuilt but annoying) and casts a doubt when standing away from the camera rig. I use both tripods all the time. Rich
  11. Nice Adam, what mount were you using for the astro images? I'm not into AP but I looked at the second image on a my large hi-res monitor and zoomed in. The stars around the central bright star with the diffraction spikes, zoomed in look like a hot air balloon rally from a distance. (they seem to be just that shape with basket off the bottom). I have no idea what causes this or how to address it. Your kids look happy. Maybe look at stopping down for dof and AF Point (1&3). PS love the hats.
  12. As promised. This camera is a modified Microsoft LifeCam. looking at the casing I would suggest that it uses a Billet Parts adapter. (don't know if they are still available) You would also need to look up Gary Honis for a guide on how to put the thing together. It fits in place of an eyepiece, connect to PC via USB and weighs almost nothing. Used to take video of the Moon and Planets, then stack the results as a still frame in something like RegiStax. If you can find one, they would be well within your budget and a handy way to get started. best, Rich
  13. No I'm not saying that at this time (in the future you will most likely if you get hooked). It's just that check that your telescope rig can handle having almost 1 1/2 pounds or 556g hanging off the back. I do have an appropriate webcam type video camera that I'll dig out and post a picture of. It weighs next to nothing and was most likely the one that Knight of Clear Skies used for Saturn in the above image. Best, Rich
  14. Just one thing. I'm not altogether sure that this telescope and mount could handle the weight of 'any' DSLR hanging off the back. My smallest is a 400D but it is still quite a lump.
  15. I think you did good. Looks like you had a vibration somewhere in the middle of the exposure? and it would seem to me as though you also caught a meteor,
  16. But what lens/lenses are you going for? Look forward to some pictures with the new kit.
  17. Clearly you will need that lens. but why????? I thought that you were aiming to upgrade your work camera, and yet now you can't fit your work 105mm lens! or any of your others. Best of luck.
  18. These cameras are a lot of money for us normal folks. My take, I do not want to risk regrets, hence I have none, by going with single digit. (always in the back of my mind would be the nagging 'less digits = better' even if totally unfounded). I would have, if I had double or triple digit. Like most folk, I started with triple digit but then 'waited' until the single digit second hand prices came down to a happy to live-with level. Anyhow; IMHO the 6DII although a fine camera, 'over-priced' should not be included in this comparison. It is 'full frame' all others are 'APS-C'. @Adam, beware, if you have a stock of EF-S lenses they will not physically attach to a Full Frame EF only body. Whereas all your lenses will work on an APS-C body. Rich
  19. WOW, superb!!! I love the comparisons.
  20. Well, for taking pictures of "really horrible" teeth in live people's heads, I suggest the Sigma 150-600mm Sport lens. It will allow you to 'park the clients' in the appropriate position and then, take the picture from the luxury of the 'Next Surgery'! Rich
  21. Of course you need a lens, you might not be sure about which one, but you definitely need it! In your line of work I would think that the best 'Prime Macro Lens' that you can fit to budget, such as the 105mm 2.8 etc Sigma could be very handy. A 10mm fisheye maybe not so good. (unless you have Cheshire Cats as clients).
  22. I too had the same choice. Went with 7DII, it is a bigger body. But if an 80D will allow you to get a lens as well, then why not. :)
  23. I've never heard of this outfit before, but if they are legit' I'll be retiring the 7D a lot sooner than I thought possible.
  24. Hi, A 5DIII or 7DII instantly spring to mind as a massive improvement on the 400D and both within the £1000. MPB. If you need on camera flash then 7DII as the 5DIII does not have it. 7DII 1.6x crop factor, 5DIII Full Frame, might be a consideration for a lot of close work? Best, Rich
  25. Well at least if you need a set of ladders you can see where he keeps them.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.