Jump to content



  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

477 Excellent

About jiberjaber

  • Rank
    Proto Star

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Interests
    Remote control gliders
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

849 profile views
  1. That will certainly make life easier!
  2. Looking forward to seeing that in action. I can't remember where I got up to in tinkering but from the video in the back up I used looks like mine last worked 4th Oct before I took it down.
  3. Well after a while I forgot about my all-sky camera and the SD card was full... so I took it inside to resuscitate is and it never made it back out until just now! I had taken a backup of home, etc and www but I had to piece together what I had done in the meantime to get it running... I suppose I should really document it but it helped being able to scroll through this thread as an aide memoire ! I need to sort out some internal heating for dew control and also a 12V feed then looking at the FoV now, I think it should be ready to move on to a pole at the end of the garden away from the
  4. I've considered similar, my egg seat cover has done sterling job but as the weather closes in there is more condensation under there. A simple bar heater with thermostat may do, say 30W. eg https://www.amazon.co.uk/Hylite-Slimline-Tubular-Heater-HHT203/dp/B00TFHBEDG Problem I can foresee which I'd like feedback on is where does the evaporated condensation go to Plus I had no plans to run 240VAC to my pier, ethernet and 13VDC was my plan!
  5. There are some online tools which can help identify what targets might work for your location and equipment then it comes down to what you fancy from a shorter list Give here a try: https://telescopius.com/deep-sky/search
  6. You're probably not using the right search term, you'd need to confirm the internal dimension but it's usually something like 5.5 OD 2.1ID plenty of solder versions around... for example: https://www.mouser.co.uk/Connectors/Power-Connectors/DC-Power-Connectors/_/N-axitt?No=25&P=1z0wxf2Z1z0wxfc There are right-angle ones on that link too but I suspect it would be neater to cut down an existing right-angle lead and solder a straight barrel connector on to it.
  7. So you don't do any sort of alignment before stacking? Irrespective of tracking accuracy etc, you probably need to align before stacking? I expect quite a few of the software packages do some sort of distortion correction as part of the registration of images
  8. What are you stacking in, Pixinsight tries to deal with distortion first before alignment, once all aligned, then stack it... might be worth taking a look at that. Want to share the files? I'm sure a few of us could have a go for you to help narrow down on to a way forward....
  9. That's cracking, I really should get round to processing my data for this though I am not sure its 900 mins I've got! It certainly gives me something to aim for now
  10. Nice wide capture, you've also ticked off Pelican Nebula in the bottom right quarter of the image
  11. How sensitive will be 1 tip bucket of water relative to how quick do you need to get the roof closed due to rain? Not sure I'd trust my rain gauge for that - I'd probably want a capacitance / resistance style rain detector for the RoR ?
  12. That's a good result, it's a shame you don't have part night lighting like here in Essex - it's great when they all go off. Only issue is when they are all off and you go past houses that have front activated lights and they then blind you as it is so relatively dark!
  13. Maximisation Limit Line It's the line used when you maximise an image window as the boundary past it won't go, as Mark mentioned most use it to put their process icons the right of it so they are still accessible when an image window is maximised.
  14. I think it depends on what you are trying to present in the image. Starless certainly has a place in the processing, it enables working on parts of the image without impacting the stars, or just working on the stars themselves. Sometimes it's better to "lower the volume" on the stars, using Starnet to do that and perhaps bring the stars back in at a lower intensity allows the intended focus of the image to be more present. Sometimes seeing the target without stars allows more of the detail to be seen by others who may not know it's there in the first place. Starnet has a place
  15. Now includes Starnet and some new options on some of the processes, but it does require an uninstall/reinstall. One I have tried out as a quick test is Adaptive Normalisation in the Image Integration which (in most cases) removes the need to run all the files through Local Normalisation process before integration. I can see a small difference between the Adaptive Normalisation and Local Normalisation results of integration (they look similar, but zoomed in, the dust clouds are a little brighter with more contrast I think) which is great as it now chops out a big time sink of running the L
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.