Jump to content

jetstream

Members
  • Posts

    7,388
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

Everything posted by jetstream

  1. I highly recommend the 2" filter as well. Your eyepiece is fine for viewing the Veil- our 25mm Super Plossl shows the Veil nicely in the H130. Advice: buy the recommended filters mentioned here (Astronomik/Televue)- I have blown many dollars experimenting.....many ...200 USD on an unuseable Lumicon when they were in transition and...
  2. @dweller25 has some of the nicest scopes on the forum Congratulations for a very fine addition to the lineup!
  3. My new Televue OIII beats a very good sample of an older Lumicon.
  4. It sounds like youre in the strike zone, but I'd try the 38mm/OIII on the Veil and define your mag limits on the Owl- I like a pocket full of cheap Circle T orthos hanging around for this. Excellent observing Robert.
  5. Great report! What is the f ratio of the scope? The Owl nebula can take much more mag than some think and using more can reveal the eyes- what eyepieces did you use on the Veil and Owl?
  6. I observe down to -40c, with -30c being a common winter temp and the skies in this weather can be stunning. I refrain from using my refractors in this weather as many issues can arise- cell distortion, dew inside the tube etc. Newts are very very tough and have no issues in the cold- but- bringing them back inside can cause frost etc. I always put any telescope in a "blanket" or the scope coat the wife made out of an old quilt. My bigger dobs are stored outside. My AZEQ6 works ok down to -15c but the display starts to go away. My Sky Commander was customized with better display heaters and works well. If observing in -25c and down you might want to consider cold temp grease IMHO. I live in NW Ontario near the US "Ice Box of the Nation".
  7. How about this- I'll observe a nebula for 3 seconds and then we'll compare notes from a 3 second camera exposure?😀 Maybe the Pleiades bubble using my H130? ps no processing...
  8. The camera might not but the processing might embellish a squeak😀
  9. Why the self doubt John? Personally I report what I see nothing more nothing less and could care less if people doubt it.
  10. I got one,well many. I can easily see Barnards Loop, the Witch Head, Pleiades Bubble complex and traces of IFN etc. What I can't confirm is the Erdidanus Loop and I've tried many many times. I'm hoping for the 24" to show me hope on this one. I should be able to see it. Oh yeah, then there is Einsteins Cross... and...
  11. When using the Heritage 130 sometimes I feel a degree of sadness... sadness because this scope competes with 2 refractors many times their price... on the other hand I get much pleasure from this telescope after accepting how much cash I blew on the others lol! I love the H130...
  12. Regardless of what the scope does within limits the eye/brain presents a sharp image, if its "pleased". I think.
  13. You have some seriously good telescopes!
  14. Our H130 goes 53x/inch, the SW 120ED just over 60x/inch and the Stellarvue 90mm Raptor 88x/inch. If I barlow the 2.4mm HR 1.5x I get 1.6mm for an unbelievable sharp 562x and an incredible 120x/inch in the TSA120.
  15. No Tak 100 but I'm pretty sure the TSA triplet APO will hold its own
  16. Great choice! Starting out with good optics and a stable mount goes a long way to ensure early success. Add a nice low power wide field for nebula at some point and a couple of good planetary eyepieces and your all set.
  17. lol Mike! Better watch the reports coming now, I just poured a concrete observing pad with indexed and levelled holes for the AZEQ6 spikes- so a very fast set up time. Can't wait to get the old obsolete TSA120 out! I love this thing... I don't want to pump it up too much though as its not really appropriate IMHO. Theres lots of good scopes out there.
  18. I wonder how many reflector owners push their scopes to the limit? Under my best conditions the 15" Astrosystems/Ostahowski mirrors goes over 60x/inch on the moon. This is truly something to see, giving a wow moment every time conditions allow. If people think 90x/inch in a refractor is amazing, try looking through a large dob capable of high power!
  19. Maybe a bit different scope? Skyliner 200P? https://www.firstlightoptics.com/dobsonians/skywatcher-skyliner-200p-dobsonian.html
  20. That is an f5 scope that will be more heavily obstructed- best to be asking more about this one IMHO...
  21. Great report Neil! The Swan is a top pick to observe, what a great object.
  22. A reflector with good optics and around 25% obstruction or less will not lose much contrast-assuming the interior of the scope is flat black or flocked. Stray light control is very important for the reflector. There is a reason that a 6" f8 newtonian is called an "APO killer"... such a scope cools fast and is easy to collimate. It will show so much more than a 90mm scope its not funny. There are mounts that can easily handle such a scope- but they will blow the budget apart. the refractor wont necessarily have better contrast and in fact the mentioned one most likely will not. A 300 pound budget mandates a 6" dob if you want a good telescope IMHO. Tracking costs lots of cash.
  23. Yes I found it odd too- I called and got a vague answer on things, no msg replies so I walked. Its too bad as I want one of these scopes.Very happy with the TSA120 however.
  24. Excellent explanation Chris and thanks for it. I have never heard of the effect of aperture explained in this way and it makes sense, sense of something I've been wondering about for years. Once again contrast is a huge factor in telescope performance.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.