Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Saganite

Members
  • Posts

    3,624
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Posts posted by Saganite

  1. 14 minutes ago, Littleguy80 said:

    Out of curiosity this thread had me looking up the Nagler 22mm as I have the APM 20mm. From specs that I saw, the Nagler weighs the same? I’m assuming it’s physically smaller. Just thinking about the OP wanting to reduce size and weight. 

    Hi Neil,

     

    I have just parted with an APM 20mm 100 deg in favour of the 2" Nagler 22mm and the weight difference was 30 ounces to 24 ounces for the Nagler 22mm .  I weighed them both.

    • Thanks 1
  2. Funny you should say that John.  I had the 20mm 100 deg eyepiece for several weeks and used it quite often.  No complaints, a fine eyepiece but ultimately I could not quite take to it much as I didn't the 13mm Ethos seven  or so years ago.  I now have a Nagler 22mm by exchange on this forum and here I'll stick...:smiley:

    • Like 3
  3. 4x binoviewing pairs

    1x 2" widefield 82 deg

    1x 7.7-15.4 mm  zoom

    1x 3-8mm  zoom

    1x 7-21mm zoom

    Three or four inexpensive eyepieces for outreach in a separate small case.

    For a long time  I had 20 to 30 eyepieces which included Orthoscopic pairs but with advancing years eye relief has  dictated which eyepieces are  to be used. Instead of three hard cases I now have just one and a couple of small Vixen cases/ shells with the zooms and a barlow......:smiley:

     

    • Like 1
  4. On 03/04/2024 at 17:52, Littleguy80 said:

    Couldn’t believe my luck when this came up on ABS on Easter Sunday! I have a birthday coming up so I’m putting it away for that. Should give some time for the clouds to clear 😉IMG_4054.thumb.jpeg.b364bca261de6542748c3bff3275a2cb.jpeg

    Hi Neil,

    After our discussion on the riser for the Berlebach Castor, I thought of you when I saw this up for sale, and I am pleased that you got it.  What a result.....:headbang2:

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  5. 8 minutes ago, F15Rules said:

    Thanks to my good friend Steve (@Saganite) (and Tim, @Franklinof course), my recently acquired Vixen LVW set is now complete..

    20240405_121911.thumb.jpg.36a4f25f9e64702359bc7f5e556923f4.jpg

    The new to me 3.5mm will give me 254x in my Vixen SD115S, and with the 1.6x barlow, 406x.

    Here's the full set.. (L-R, back to front) - 3.5mm, 5mm, 8mm, 13mm, 17mm, 22mm, 42mm..

    Plus decloaked 2" Axiom LX 23mm & 31mm 84 deg UWAs at bottom right..

    20240405_122056.thumb.jpg.cb49a0ca73e3dd815c8508477d96e9ae.jpg

    Scope and Cyclops Eyepiece wise, I'm now done!! 😂

    Dave

    Very nice Dave, I feel much better now.....:grin:

    • Haha 1
  6. 20 hours ago, Highburymark said:


    Nice choices Steve.

    I tend to use the amici when I’m panning around the surface, and looking at features on a wider scale. I use binoviewer and Nagler 13s for an expansive view, and I do prefer a left-right orientation for this. Think it’s because I studied lunar maps from a young age and still find it more natural. Then for close up lunar details I more often use a right-left prism or mirror. It just involves a little thought before I set up.
    To be honest, everything looks so great on the Moon - including pretty much every eyepiece, telescope and diagonal I’ve ever used - that it’s not the best target for distinguishing critical performance differences. So for those who prefer correct orientation on the Moon, a quality amici is well worth considering. 

    Yep, bino and 13 Naglers for me also Mark , on Lunar and planetry, the perfect combination in my scopes.

    • Like 1
  7. My collection at PAS , of a beautiful Vixen SD115S means that I am done, happy, and contented, for sure, and for the rest of my natural etc,etc

    At the moment I still have my ED103S and felt the same with that, but I was always aware of the bigger sibling.  I had a hand in Dave's ( F15 Rules ) acquisition of his , quite without knowing it, and he has reciprocated because he had suggested how good  it would be to find a discounted one at the show.  On the strength of that I rang Bresser and asked and to my amazement they did, at a tremendous discount.

    They are both in perfect balance and a spell of decent sky will allow me to  align them accurately.

    Dave liked it, even the ' blingy thingy ' on the Vixen, he said , but I like red, my car is red, unfortunately not a ferrari red ferrari....🤣

     

    IMG_3288.JPG

    IMG_3289.JPG

    • Like 20
    • Thanks 1
  8. 5 minutes ago, wookie1965 said:

    What a scope I can only dream of something like that.

    Thanks Paul I appreciate your comment and it was a great shame you couldn't make it, but one of these days.

    It is a lovely scope and I count myself fortunate to have got it , but the reality is that I almost certainly see no more than you do with your scopes.

    Take care

    • Like 3
  9. This has been used only briefly as a demonstrator, but looks and feels as new as a...... well ,new one, and at 25% discount I am very happy.  It came in its original box with all the accessories which I don't want so will be selling in due course. It has certainly lifted what was a disappointing show.  Meeting up again with Mike , Alan, and Ed made it worthwhile, as did  the Rowan boys Derek and Dave. 

    The Feathertouch of course was on my ED103 and swapping focusers was the first thing I did once home.

    IMG_3278.JPG

    IMG_3279.JPG

    IMG_3280.JPG

    • Like 14
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.