-
Posts
13,777 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by happy-kat
-
Refractor + Barlow + dslr = planets?
happy-kat replied to TiffsAndAstro's topic in Getting Started With Imaging
planets are tiny you may not need a flattener if you were using a tmount with a tring to your dslr then you could insert the tmount into a barlow or screw it to a shorty barlow then put dslr with barlow into focuser on telescope i think could look at this https://www.astropix.com/html/equipment/canon_one_to_one_pixel_resolution.html -
First light with new Altair 585c - M81 and M82
happy-kat replied to Astronomist's topic in EEVA - Reports
M82 has worked particularly well. For reduced trailing and rotation in the northern hemisphere aiming E or W ideally lower altitudes will help eek out the exposure time you may find you can use -
-
Getting back into it!
happy-kat replied to Nebula82's topic in Getting Started Equipment Help and Advice
Welcome Liking at sky watcher for example keeping in budget of the suggestion you gave there's the skymax 127 or 102 in a flavour of mount options. Depends what's key to you like portability, goto, ease or weight etc. -
have you tried sharpcap sharpsolve and the .25 database
-
Sky-watcher P 130/650 Starquest review
happy-kat replied to Nikolai De Silva's topic in Member Equipment Reviews
(When viewing the site using the simple theme on a mobile all the review text is white) Lovely to see images as well in your review, where they afocal images? It's a great setup I like how the mount is versatile offering both altaz or Equatorial with the further option of adding a motor for in EQ use. -
It's not looking optimistic with the Moon and clouds for me I'd have to hope for a fireball, I'll try and have a go anyway.
- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
-
Hope you get clear windows I just looked at the aurora alert and it's red now
-
That image isn't bad, the star shapes are quite good so if that was the lens I had I'd be trying it again. If it's a mirror lens is it f8? Whilst that might be slower then F5 still useable on bright targets could also try it on bright globular clusters I get odd white cross shape stars and think it's more the camera then the lens As processing skills develop old data can be revisited and reprocesses. If you decide you don't want it, clean it and could pass it to a charity shop
-
Thinking going forward
happy-kat replied to TiffsAndAstro's topic in Discussions - Scopes / Whole setups
When fiddling with processing I prefer no refraction spikes, it's easier to make a star round if there are no spikes. -
Thinking going forward
happy-kat replied to TiffsAndAstro's topic in Discussions - Scopes / Whole setups
For me the first question is defraction spikes or not -
That's a corker capture and nice focus on your allsky stars
-
I connect my synscan wifi dongle direct to my compatible skywatcher mount and the dongle flashes when connected
-
The shorter the focal length used for imaging with would be more forgiving. If you have a 3d printer there is a wedge you can print at home Cuiv reviewed it on YT.
-
Have you tried turning off your home wifi, wrapping the dongle in tin foil and then doing the reset
-
At looks like you already have the 80ED telescope which would be great to use for imaging, I'd skip the 200PDS, there's plenty to learn with using the 80ED and great imaging to be had. Depending on what astro camera you get you might find starting with a IR filter for the Moon or planets a great start. Post processing, try them all, there are free trials if you're trying paid for software. See which one you get on with using, many are excellent from free to paid. If starting with your static tripod use your wisest lens with your camera and take lots of frames, then when you stack them you could start to see more and areas like Deneb are great for this. Have fun
-
April did make me double think 🙂
-
This might help https://stargazerslounge.com/topic/420735-synscan-wifi-reset-issues/
-
What are you using to power the mount