Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_31.thumb.jpg.b7a41d6a0fa4e315f57ea3e240acf140.jpg

VigdisVZ

Members
  • Content Count

    2,306
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

VigdisVZ last won the day on January 6 2013

VigdisVZ had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

621 Excellent

4 Followers

About VigdisVZ

  • Rank
    Brown Dwarf

Profile Information

  • Location
    Uppland, Sweden

Recent Profile Visitors

2,909 profile views
  1. It's offers great value for the money, but as a fully manual telescope it takes a bit of getting used to navigate with it. However, once you're used to a dobsonian, you can easily upgrade to the larger models with great ease. If you're just starting out I'll recommend the book "Turn Left At Orion" as a good guide to what objects to chase down with your new little dobsonian. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Turn-Left-Orion-Hundreds-Telescope/dp/0521153972/ref=dp_ob_title_bk
  2. You could potentially use narrowband filters, but RGB filters are a waste of time. However, since a DSLR already filters away much of the narrowband signal, that also is waste of time. A modded DSLR however....
  3. Yeah Robin and Nicos is right, if you're looking at spending only 250£, don't spend it on electronics. Get a 150P Skywatcher Dobsonian, and get a nice eyepiece , a Telrad and start learning your way around the sky.
  4. A 120mm APO is quite heavy. I'd settle for an NEQ-6 (Syntrek is the version without GOTO).
  5. Hi again. The Orion 80mm has cheap lens setup (does not have ED glass) and will give chromatic aberration, hence not suited for photography. It's more suited as a guide-telescope or for simple visual observations. The CG4 is weak and will struggle to give consistent results compared to a HEQ-5 or better mounts.
  6. Hello and welcome, you came to the right place There are a few things to consider in this case since we're talking about a kid, not an adult: Binoculars is the adult solution. Versatile, but very fidgety to use if you're not patient. Binoculars are excellent for their versatility but not for "wowing" a budding astronomer.You risk having him lose interest in astronomy by giving him the wrong choice here.I believe that a kid wants something that looks and feels like a real telescope or they'll lose interest. Again, the "wow" factor.There are also good and bad choices for telescopes, and much ha
  7. Are you looking for a DSLR to dual-use for daytime or one for only deepsky?
  8. Sorry, mean to say HEQ-5 and NEQ-6. The Celestron equalivents are Advanced VX and CGEM. Can't speak about any other mounts since I have no experience or know any people who use them. THere are more expensive APO-refractors than the 80ED, also the 80ED is a type that comes from several manufacturers. The PDS-range newtonians are good, using the 150 myself, but they need a coma corrector to take a flat field image, much the same as refractors need flatteners. It's a jungle of equipment out there, so be sure to read the book I recommended first, before buying ANYTHING else. You can also look at t
  9. Hi again The 10" solid tube is not suited for imaging. Way too large, heavy and bulky for a normal mount to handle. Even the NEQ-6 will struggle with it. Unless you start looking at the really expensive mounts... but those are not good for beginning. When you read about the load capacities of different mounts, you should always count that in half when imaging. A NEQ-6 will handle 20kg or so for visual, but it's only recommended to load 10kg for imaging. You honestly need a mount that can carry the telescope + extras and not struggle. If you overload the equipment you will have to throw images
  10. Can in theory be done with Live View or live video output on a computer, but its going to be hard and even more super hard once you start stacking the magnification...
  11. A) Yeah, video for Jupiter and Saturn. It really helps with a tracking mount but you can if you're really good push the scope in order to capture enough frames. It'll probably be extremely hard since the starlight is a very narrow band of light, and the atmosphere makes it move. Longer exposures with a tracking mount is probably better, plus you get more context by seeing the surrounding stars. You could however try with high ISO and short exposure times, you might get lucky if the star is bright enough... C) M31 is faint compared. You need to be using equatorial, tracking mount for this.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.