Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

jnp

Members
  • Posts

    338
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jnp

  1. Excuse the late interest in this thread, I haven't been on here for ages.

    This thread is indeed an epic, but I am unclear of the conclusions as this goes off topic in the 11 pages.

    Can someone correct my understanding below and/or provide a management type summary (i.e. aimed at 4 year olds)?

    1) A 1000d has had the bayer matrix + micro lenses ground off. The sensor works but the quality is poor due to uneveness of the sensor?

    2) Gina performed a heroic quest to debayer a 1100d, but was unable due to the differences in construction, expecially the fixed glass plate.

    If point 1 is true then has anyone considered using a transparent gel (ideally non electrically conductive) under a glass plate over the sensor to 'fill' the scratches? Perhaps optical cement will do it? (Aplologies if this has been suggested but I didn't see it)

    I am close to getting a CCD but wondering if the 'spare' 1000d can get a new lease of life?

    cheers

    John

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.