Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

SteveNickolls

Members
  • Posts

    2,055
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by SteveNickolls

  1. I would agree that his autumn has been poor both for observing and DSO imaging, my last DSO imaging was over six weeks ago. I keep details of observing and imaging sessions and this year only by starting to image the Sun and Moon (when clouds have allowed) have the overall figures kept generally healthy but actual DSO work has virtually stopped. Here's the imaging record since 2016-

    Year

    Month

    J

    J

    A

    S

    O

    N

    D

    J

    F

    M

    A

    M

    Total

    Av

    16-17

    2

    1

    6

    3

    2

    1

    3

    1

    0

    4

    5

    2

    30

    2.5

    17-18

    1

    1

    7

    6

    2

    2

    4

    4

    1

    1

    2

    3

    34

    2.8

    18-19

    1

    3

    8

    4

    5

    4

    5

    6

    3

    1

    1

    3

    44

    3.7

    19-20

    0

    0

    5

    8

    2

    0

    1

    4

    4

    3

    4

    1

    32

    2.7

    20-21

    0

    1

    2

    9

    2

    3

    5

    3

    5

    0

    3

    0

    33

    2.8

    21-22

    1

    5

    2

    5

    0

    2

    2

    10

    2

    4

    4

    5

    42

    3.5

    22-23

    2

    0

    11

    2

    4

    5

    6

    7

    5

    2

    3

    2

    49

    4.1

    23-24

    6

    5

    9

    9

    6

    11

    0

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

                                 

    Cheers,
    Steve

  2. November 2023 Update

    Adding a 5.5" pier to the GEM28

    I've recently purchased a 5.5" pier extension part from FLO to add to the GEM28 set up. After adding a long 290 mm x 90 mm William Optics plate to hold the imaging gear and Pegasus Power Box Micro unit there was a chance the plate could catch on the location of the mount's hand controller and top of the tripod legs so the next acquisition has been the iOptron 5.5" pier extension.

    20231125_091548.thumb.jpg.7e0a66deb31a3abe351ac5f5fe02439b.jpg.fa81258f757855866bf6a82160d98ed8.jpg

    The extension comes in one piece, is made from aluminium and feels very sturdy. Also supplied are two hex bolts that connect the pier extension to the head of the tripod and an additional alignment peg which can be seen in the photo inside the plastic bag. This alignment peg should be fitted on the top of the pier as it is slightly shorter than the peg used originally on the mount. Don't take out the original peg to use it on the pier as I first did-doh! IOptron also make a slightly longer 8" pier extension shown below should your set up require slightly more room to operate-

    image.thumb.png.e27ec5d578accb12cda623d15accde8d.png

    Cheers,
    Steve

    • Like 1
  3. On 13/11/2023 at 07:03, Fraunhoffer said:

    I was going to try and use an old photo exposure meter, but i dont think it goes low enough. I can read to 1.4 lux and with a bit of faffing about with the settings, maybe 0.35 lux.

    Plan B is to cross check my mirror less camera with the exposure meter and point the camera with a 30 deg fov straight up at my grey sky and adjust the camera exposure until the 'average' setting says +-0. This should put a sharp histogram peak in the middle. Then work out extrapolating the setting to get another estimate of background lux. in c/m^2

    I thought one of the table values from my exp meter might be useful.

    Asa 50, f/2.8 , 30s is listed as 1.4 lux., so im thinking by cranking up the camera iso i can get an estimate of sky background. At, least to compare sites.

    Here you go.

    https://www.pbase.com/image/37608572

    Cheers,

    Steve

  4. It is tough right now, tonight the weather is as bad as it's been for ages and who knows when we will get a decent night again?  The conditions will improve and a pair of binoculars will not break the bank but will keep that contact with the night sky until you can best decide what to do. I've decided I have enough stuff so no new purchases here and will wait to use it some night soon.

    Cheers,

    Steve

    • Like 3
  5. Hi Phil, yes the mini has never worked with the Eagle Core just the USB 3.0 version of the camera and as you now say the camera cost exceeds that of the Eagle Core. 😯

    The Eagle Core should work fine for what you want and I noticed PLL do have a repository of software for the device on their site.

    Hope once you have a suitable camera to try with it that you get some good images.

    Cheers,
    Steve

     

  6. Hi SkyPhil, sorry not to have seen your original post concerning the Eagle Core but pleased you have it working, at least with Ethernet. I created a thread here-

    after getting my unit back in the day (July 2019) but haven't used it much recently having moved to a iOptron GEM28 mount and astro-camera's.

    I was able to operate my Eagle Core both by wi-fi using an Android tablet and Ethernet (I used a cross-over Ethernet cable though it might not be necessary depending on your computer). To use wi-fi you employ a different address to when using the Ethernet version. 

    Wi-fi use 192.168.4.1

    Ethernet cable use 192.168.0.250

    At the time I created myself an aide memoire-

    Procedure When Using Eagle Core.docx

    From memory it was important to connect things in a particular order but was able to use the device numerous times and include guiding.

    I recently last posted on the thread that PLL had discontinued the Eagle Core though some retailers were still selling stock. I take it you have a written manual to help setting up?

    I hope you can get your unit working on your mobile.

    Cheers,
    Steve

  7. Long live the Eagle (Core)!

    I notice that PrimaLuceLabs no longer advertise the Eagle Core product on their own website though the software can be found here-https://www.primalucelab.com/info/downloads.html

    Some remaining examples of the Eagle Core are still available on certain online astronomy retailer sites and eBay but I feel the toll of successive waves of ASiair versions able to support DSLR’s has finally ‘done for it’. Certainly there has never been a time when so many different control solutions for astro-photography are now ‘out there’ an the onward march of technology contianlly moves ever onwards. The Eagle Core units will still provide useful life for imaging in the future with supported DSLR’s and still great for people entering the hobby in a relatively low cost way.

    Looking back I consider the structural element of the Eagle Core, as with the newer Eagle series models, was underappreciated but was a valuable attribute of the product and still not really shared with other computer solutions.

    I always found the Eagle Core to work well but for me it’s primary selling point of controlling a DSLR finally lost much of its hold on migrating to a dedicated astro-camera having the benefits of much lower read noise, higher quantum efficiency and Tec cooling over my  modified Canon 700D. I still have the Canon 700D DSLR in my collection and intend to hold on to it and the Eagle Core as a legacy of the past and the many good times had imaging under starry skies.

    Long live the Eagle (Core).

    Cheers,
    Steve

  8. 19 hours ago, Ouroboros said:

    Having a permanent set up must make all the difference though.  

    Sorry to read of the frustrations with tne hobby in tne UK. I've never known a week of sucessive clear nights to image under and don't think I'd have the stamina to stay up consistently into the wee hours. 

    As regards an observatory unless you fully automate it you need to be awake to open and close it! Maybe better to have arrangements in place as other have said to be quickly able to set up alightweight rig in a pre-marked location? I think if you have the passion, (t's in the word amateur) try diversifying to overcome the lack of long, clear night skies-solar imaging, EAA, meteor imaging, lunar imaging, double stars. One weather defying hobby is detecting meteors with an sdr radio and diy parts from Wickes or B&Q. Having an alternative, quick set up rig means you can get out under the stars and Moon or the Sun and take images; or try a pait of 10 x 50 binoculars and see more objects on one night than ever before. I have wondered if the Dwarf 2 and SeeStar units would be useful for less than perfect nights? Certainly they will help pay for new children's ponies ar FLO this Christmas.

    Hope you can keep on in there. 👍

    Cheers,

    Steve

    • Like 2
  9. Hi Elp, thanks for your feedback and for showing and describing your working arrangements. A picture paints a thousand words so they say. Nothing is going to happen fast here developing a dual-rig set up for use on the GEM28 but the potential to collect upwards of x2 the light in a session is a very strong motivator if money is no object.

    Cheers,
    Steve

    • Like 1
  10. Hi Elp, thanks for this practical advice regarding a dual rig set up. I had considered alignment of the two optics and there are a number of products on the market to allow adjustment of one of the pair.

    image.png.e26080658ebad2d0d6c2026e5fcbc8b1.png

    https://www.teleskop-express.de/shop/product_info.php/info/p9974_TS-Optics-Dual-Mount---parallel-mounting-with-fine-adjustment.html  Price 285 Euros. You can get two of the adjustable units at more cost.

    image.png.1a2db27ac0fec3181c5b8b07de575507.png

    Avalon X Guider (c300Euro’s).

    With both these you have the concern over balance.

     

    Presently I'm at most using 3 minute sub-exposures and dithering every 2+ frames. With such a dual-rig arrangement this would have to be decresed in frequency. 

    Here is my updated write up, it is based on my particular control arrangements but there might be somethnig useful in it for you. I don't intend going down this line despite the attraction of almost doubling available imaging time.

    Cheers,
    Steve

    Project Tweedledum and Tweedledee.docx

  11. I do like the idea of using two lenses on one mount to capture more data in the same time and have looked into the pro's and con's of it all. It would be very useful for making the most from our uncertain weather. Do you incorporate any dithering in the image capture sequence since one camera can be syncronised to the dither and will not lose sub-frames that way but the second camera will be affected?

    Anyway I hope you can obtain better balance in the future and so lengthen your sub-exposure times and remove spoilt frames.

    Cheers,
    Steve

  12. Hi Elp, thanks for your message.

    These photos show the current payload on the GEM28, I recently added a Hyperpod unit to hold a ZWO EAF and a Williams Optics Vixen plate to give more space for fixing the Pegasus PowerBox Micro unit.

    20230728_202647.thumb.jpg.3e973c6c5e72ccb80e0e08af0cf1b6ce.jpg

    20230728_202626.thumb.jpg.810b3f79ca95e3e1b41bd594b55a8145.jpg

    20230725_150808.thumb.jpg.ad1091f94b279c196065051bd86ebcc1.jpg.ae8563369f2e56b4399a2e7e24c36183.jpg

    Typically I stopped weighing individual parts last season since the payload capacity of the mount (12.7kg) was clearly well in excess of the intended use it would be put to but my best guess is the total payload is modest at around 4kg plus cables. I do now use the original 4.7 kg counterweight for balancing.

    As regards balancing I agree you have to work hard at it, I have found adding a spare Omegon Tri-finder (weighing around 210g) to the side opposite the EAF has helped balancing in the 'z' axis. It is my understanding that the internals of the mount head are not symmetrical and lead to imbalance in the 'z' axis'. In its design the mount can accommodate the iGuide accessory kit (weight 200g) on one side and think this is meant to help balancing on the 'z' axis without making the issue noticeable. I would suggest adding some mild additional mass on the side of the mount head where the iGuide accessory can be loated and see if this helps overall balance and performance. Your HEM with it's semi-harmonic gearing neatly side steps any RA issues with balance and is a nice feature.

    The Samyang has the virtue of having just 135mm of focal length and with the ASI533MM-Pro the resolution of the set up is 5.74" per pixel the longest sub-exposures I've needed to take have been 3 minutes but apart from cloud spoilt frames I do not expect to get bad frames. Sharpcap Pro controls dithering and have not had issues relating to settling down at all.

    If you do try to balance by adding a small mass to one side of the mount head I'd be interested hearing how you fare.

    Cheers,
    Steve

     

  13. September 2023 Update

    I hope to continue posting data taken with my GEM28 set up to help inform prospective users and existing owners of the performance data obtained during imaging. This season I have had six occassions to image and these are the guiding values from PHD2 and which show consistency in the values obtained. iOptron states that the mount should have Peak values of <10"-

    PHD2 RMS, Peak and PAE Values from GEM28 Imaging Sessions

    Date

    RMS

    Peak

    PAE

    RA

    DEC

    RA

    DEC

    7.8.2023

    1.12”

    0.78”

    -4.71”

    -5.71”

    1.6’

    15.8.2023

    0.87”

    0.89”

    -6.40”

    5.15”

    1.0’

    20.8.2023

    0.87”

    0.74”

    -4.75”

    4.81”

    1.0’

    21.8.2023

    0.77”

    0.57”

    -4.05”

    3.42”

    0.5’

    4.9.2023

    0.92”

    0.62”

    4.37”

    -6.04”

    0.8’

    5.9.2023

    0.99”

    0.85”

    4.77”

    -5.19”

    1.0’

     

    Cheers,
    Steve

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.