Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep9_banner.thumb.jpg.05c1bdd298547fd225896a3d99c9bc17.jpg

Islander

Members
  • Content Count

    568
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

120 Excellent

5 Followers

About Islander

  • Rank
    Proto Star

Profile Information

  • Location
    Orkney
  1. From Wikipedia... Two spectroscopic companions have been proposed to the red supergiant star. Analysis of polarization data from 1968 through 1983 indicated a close companion with a periodic orbit of about 2.1 years. Using speckle interferometry, the team concluded that the closer of the two companions was located at 0.06″±0.01″ (≈9 AU) from the main star with a position angle of 273 degrees, an orbit that would potentially place it within the star's chromosphere. The more distant companion was estimated at 0.51″±0.01″ (≈77 AU) with a position angle of 278 degrees.[69][70] Further studies have found no evidence for these companions or have actively refuted their existence,[71] but the possibility of a close companion contributing to the overall flux has never been fully ruled out.[72] High-resolution interferometry of Betelgeuse and its vicinity, far beyond the technology of the 1980s and '90s, have not detected any companions.[16][73]
  2. Let me say it again. Betelgeuse is not a threat to Earth or life on Earth. Oh and a quote from that article: "But that doesn’t mean – contrary to scare stories in the media – that the core has collapsed, and is about to trigger a supernova. For a start, it would implode in literally a matter of seconds, and the shock wave would rip through Betelgeuse before the outer layers have a chance to fade. So if this dimming were a harbinger of doom, Betelgeuse would have self-destructed weeks ago. Betelgeuse will go supernova one day, and rival the Full Moon in brightness – but probably not for 100,000 years."
  3. None of the possible outcomes are a threat to Earth. The most likely outcome is that it will eventually return to normal brightness.
  4. Everything has to happen some time, and not all of the possibilities are happening. The scientific consensus seems to be that the dimming isn't that unusual unless it persists. Even if it does persist it's more likely that it'll return at some point. A supernova is unlikely, but in the event it happens in our lifetime, it's not a threat. It's also more likely to produce a neutron star than a black hole but again, neither are dangerous to Earth.
  5. It does sound like you're confused. If it returns to normal brightness then it'll carry on as normal, no supernova just a red supergiant star. If it continues dimming, then something new is happening but the likelihood is that the effect will be down to expulsion of material which partially obscures the star and eventually it'll brighten again. If it were to become a supernova, then it wouldn't affect us apart from being visible in daytime and eventually changing the shape of Orion forever. To become a black hole it has to undergo catastrophic gravitational collapse and that would produce a supernova. It's still not dangerous to Earth though.
  6. Two things, the net gravitational effect on Earth will be zero, and nobody can predict the exact date of a supernova occurring.
  7. No, it really isn't. The more sensationalist press might run with that but it's not mainstream scientific opinion. Red supergiants are inherently variable. Betelgeuse has dimmed somewhat but that's likely to be caused by material being expelled, again a feature of red supergiants.
  8. Seriously, Betelgeuse is too distant to affect us whatever happens to it. It's more likely that it'll brighten again and return to business as usual than become a supernova.
  9. Why would a stellar merger become a black hole? Also, where did the date pop up from? I'm really not sure what you're looking for...
  10. Better pack a waterproof and umbrella just to be on the safe side
  11. They aren't coming at us. Quote from the article: "The symmetry of the bubbles billowing above and below the galaxy suggests they were formed by an extremely energetic explosion near the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way. The most likely explanation is a flare up in the black hole’s activity as it gobbled up extra nearby material and burped out other particles and radiation." Note the first statement in the quote "above and below the galaxy" not laterally and towards the arms.
  12. No. The e+9 means that the decimal point shifts 9 places to the right. As others have already said, a parsec is 3.26. light years. A Megaparsec is a million times that.
  13. It's the density that matters and the density that causes the curvature of spacetime to increase. When the star runs out of fuel, there is no longer sufficient pressure of fusion to hold the outer layers up against gravity, the star is no longer in hydrostatic equilibrium and the outer layers rapidly collapse into the core which then further collapses until the density is infinite.
  14. No. The Earth would experience the same gravitational pull as it did before the Sun collapsed (which it actually couldn't - too little mass available). It would continue to orbit normally.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.