Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Marki

Members
  • Posts

    1,892
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Marki

  1. I have a Skywatcher AZ-EQ 6GT which I mainly use in equatorial mode - its been really good over the years - robust, quiet and tracks well (well, at least for my needs; I'm pretty much visual only). Handles my 125mm f9 achro easily and manages my SW 150mm ED f8 ok too (for visual, certainly). The SW 150 ED is c. 9.5 kg for OTA and rings. This mount should have no problems with a 115mm Triplet. I have no hesitation recommending it.

  2. Thanks for that link John. Excellent resource I'd completely forgotten about!

    My night wasn't so good and pretty frustrating - haze and ridges of cloud rolled in as just as I'd got aligned/balanced and cooled. Seeing started off average, but declined. I knew it was going south when one minute I could see the F component of the trapezium and the next it was gone and the main four were dimming. Like you I then retreated to a few easy doubles in the Cancer/Leo region, and enjoyed some moon-time. I did play with seeing how much magnification I could usefully use on the moon with the Skywatcher ED (pretty high, it turns out) as I'm nearly ready to write up my review  of it now - I just really want a good clear night of steady seeing (don't we all :) ).

     

    • Like 3
  3. So, a beautiful clear, crisp, cold night here in York, with steady seeing and reasonable transparency (allowing for the moon... ). Best night I've had in ages, and typically one before an early start for work!

    I decided to go "old school" for this evening, with a 5" achromat (TAL 125R f9). I have some history with this telescope - I ordered it from Italy, and it arrived with some awful issues visually - soft, unable to come to sharp focus etc., but thanks to the good offices of ES Reid its spherical aberration has been pretty much cured. It is certainly not the most expensive telescope I've ever owned, nor technically the best performing, but the most travelled (well, it was made in Siberia and came to the UK via Italy, and Ive taken it to Skye on holiday with me twice)! It is simple in construction and finish, robust, with a single speed but effective crayford focusser and a fixed plastic dewshield on a plain white tube (the same as the 100mm RS), which flares about three-quarters of the way up its length expanding to accomodate the 5 " objective cell. I have probably spent more time with this scope than any of the others I have owned.

    On the right night, this telescope is fantastic. It almost seems that its Siberian origins come into play, as it gets better and better the colder it is. And it is cold tonight!

    I started with the moon. Wonderful sharp views along the terminator and I could pile on the magnification to well over x300. Yes, there is some colour spill on the limb, but I can ignore it happily. The differences in the "grain" of the surfaces in the various mare and plateaux, the stark contrast between the shadows on craters and mountains and the various rilles that I can see more than make up for this. As the seeing steadied I was able to resolve down to 4km happily (and a little more with the eye of faith)  - the craterlets in Clavius were a joy to behold and to count - best views I've had in a long time. And now I really need to improve my lunar geopgraphy to understand and name the features I was seeing.

    I turned to Orion next. M42 shows real structure - not quite as much as in my 6" ED, but tantalisingly 3d (If that makes sense) and gorgeous nonetheless. Orion is relatively low for me and part obscured by twiggy bare trees, and above my neighbours offshot kitchen with thermal plumes from their central heating boiler vent to deal with. Regretfully, these obsrtuctions and thermal distortions meant that tonight I was unable to pull out the F component of the Trapezium, but I did just get the E part. No luck with Rigel or Sirius. Sigma Orionis did split nicely though.

    I then tried a few more nice doubles, including Beta Mon (I really enjoy this system - its a "new" find for me), then went for my main planned target, Tegmine, now that my eye was attuned. I used a Baader 10mm Ortho on a Baader x2.25 barlow to get x253. The A/B pair were cleary resolved, and heavily "notched", but not a split. The target was quite high by now, and the seeing holding steady, so I popped in an 8mm Ortho (same barlow) for x316. And a sliver of clear sky separated the two stars, with one noticeably less bright than the other. Vey happy result.

    I decided, despite the moonlight, to go galaxy hunting. Nothing doing in Leo, I just could not see M65 or M66. I turned north to M51, and could just make out a very dim blur, no structure and I couldn't differentiate NGC5195. Similary with M101, a very feint blur and that only seen with averted vision and "tapping" the eyepiece (the movement helped me be certain if the blur was just light spill or "real", if you see what I mean). M81 and M82 were easily seen though. I finished on Mizar, simply because I like it and enjoy seeing that double together with Alcor in one easy field. Sometimes, I really enjoying simply spending some time on "simple" or "easy" targets, which I'll often overlook just because they are somehow "obvious".

    All in all, I really enjoyed my night out - its nights like these that make all the frustrations worth it! Clear skies, all!

     

     

     

    • Like 15
  4. Much better conditions tonight for me. Cold, clear and steady seeing and significantly better tranparency than yesterday (well, taking the moon into consideration). I'm using my 5" achro (TAL125r) tonight. Decided to have another crack at Tegmine, after getting my eye in on Beta Mon and a few other targets. I was able to push the magnification more this evening than yesterday, This target began to resolve very nicely at x253, but not quite split. Popped in an 8mm baader ortho and the baader x2.25 barlow for x316 and was rewarded with a sliver of clear sky between the A/B pair. Really happy!

    Right, now I've warmed up a bit off out again!

    • Like 3
  5. Started off well early evening but the seeing seemed to get worse, albeit steady. Moon light scattering everywhere, and transparency deteriorated with thin haze in waves rolling in from abut 11pm. Gave up around midnight.

    Spent some time on the moon, which was excellent, and had some fun double-hunting nonetheless, including some new ones for me such as Iota Cancri, Beta Mon, 57 Cancri, 38 Gem and some others. But couldn't split Rigel, and couldn't split Tegmine and couldn't see either or E or F in the Trapezium. Spent a fair bit of time with the SW150ED and starting to form some clearer views on that which I'll post elsewhere. Anyway, always better to be out under the sky without wall to wall clouds :).

     

    • Like 3
  6. The one I use most is a TS Optics branded WA 20mm super plossl. Cheap as chips when I bought it but crystal clear across the field, superb value for money - my "alignment" eyepiece and general workhorse. Its probably my favourite as much for its utility as well as sharpness.

    Then I usually move on to a TAL 15mm Kellner, probably my second-most used ep, and from there on to my Baader 10mm ortho and if the conditions are right I push on through my smaller Baader orthos from there.

    I don't really have much in the widefield way, but I do have a 2" 30mm TS Optics branded GSO Erfle - that is wonderful for framing open clusters and things like the double cluster and sweeping through expansive and dense star fields.

    An honourable mention to my TAL 25mm Plossl, really clear and sharp. This was my workhorse until I got the TS 20mm. It was my first decent eyepiece and was in a different league to the 25mm plossl that came with my frst scope, a Celestron 8SE - that scope was excellent and I still regret selling it but that ep was poor.

    I did have a TV Delos 10mm and x2.5 powermate at one time, but sold them. Dunno why now 🤔. I found I wasn't really using them (the powermate saw a little more action than the Delos), and I don't really miss them. I'm not sure I was at a stage the hobby where I could appreciate them, maybe.

    • Like 1
  7. Does anyone know if the Mark IV zoom is a significant improvement on the Mk III? I have the latter - its pretty heavy, and I think the 8mm highest setting is somewhat "soft" compared to all the other settings. Mine is a good few years old now and coming very loose inside (it rattles) and was wondering about upgrading to the IV. The barlow for this zoom is very good though - I recommend it.

     

  8. 1 hour ago, Geoff Barnes said:

    Just a quick brief follow up, I had a look at Mars and Rigel yesterday evening in clear skies but with a still hazy horizon and the views were terrible, impossible to achieve sharp focus over 100x magnification. I found the 20mm setting with the Baader zoom giving 75x was the best I could achieve. 

    Will do more investigating in different conditions.

     

    I seem to have had too many nights ike that recently :(.

     

    • Sad 1
  9. Love mine. Had it for around 5 years now (predates the new "pro" branding and green setting circles). Used to use it in AZ mode with an 8" SCT and 80mm refractor. Nowadays I mainly use it in EQ mode, to get my long refractors a little higher off the ground :). Manages even my 6" f8 'frac with little problem. I've found mine to be robust, accurate (well, certainly enough for my needs as a mainly visual user) and easy to use. I tend to leave mine set-up in the garden under a scope cover for long(ish) periods of time. I think these mounts are fantastic value for money. I am tempted to get that wooden tripod set-up JeremyS has in his photos though... .

    • Like 1
  10. Hi there!

    If its the same as the synscan version on my handset (for my AZ-EQ 6 GT), there is a park scope function.

    This can be found from the main menu, under utilities , keep scrolling til you come to park scope. This sets it to the home position you have set (for me usually straight up when I'm operating in EQ mode).

    No idea about the power issue though, sorry.

  11. I really liked the Equinox 80 I had. Regret selling it. Nice views, nice build quality and a handy portable size. I've recently filled this gap in my scope arsenal with one of TS's 80mm EDs. https://www.teleskop-express.de/shop/product_info.php/language/en/info/p7169_TS-Optics-ED-APO-80-mm-f-7-Refraktor-mit-2-5--R-P-Okularauszug.html.

    To be honest I never had a real issue with colour control with the equinox except on the very brightest of objects. The TS seems marginally better controlled (f7) and by marginally I mean I barely had any issue with the equinox, and so far no issue with the TS. I've really had little chance to use it much as yet, though. I think you'd need to go triplet to completely avoid the issue?

  12. So, finally got to spend some time with the SW150 ED. Here it is looming out of the dark! Big, but much more wieldy (if thats a word) at f8 than the Istar 150 f10 I used to own. Seeing pretty "soft" tonight, and regretfully no view to the south west (so no supere conjunction). But a lovely view of M42, lots of structure in the nebula at 100x and 120x. Managed a nice convincing split on Sigma Orionis at x120, but then it started clouding over. Really need more time, but the more I use it, the better I'm liking it.

     

    SW150ED in action.jpg

    • Like 13
  13. This relative newbie really appreciates your help and advice over the last few years! SGL is what it is due to the efforts of people like you, John! Here's to the next 15 years (of mostly clear skies, hopefully :) )

    And can I second (third, fourth, whatever ;) ) the props to FLO and the rest of the SGL mods and team too!

    • Thanks 1
  14. Got mine today. Outside cardboard was in a worse state than garyblueboy's, but transport case well protected by the styrofoam (or whatever) two price casing and was unmarked. Contents of case absolutely fine. I really like how the focusser end is protected in that one piece foam insert.

    Even managed to get 45 mins outside with it before the clouds rolled in - what I saw was enough to really hint at its potential. Can't wait for a proper night out though.

    Loads easier to manage than the Istar 150 f10 too... . Case is a bit of a monster though!

     

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.