Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Dave Smith

Members
  • Posts

    3,212
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Dave Smith

  1. The H-alpha image is the first I have published using a double stack unit on my 80mm Lunt. Dave
  2. There's a nice group of Sunspots coming into view and I rather like the filaprom just East of South in the Halpha image. Dave
  3. Lovely Ha images. You are making me wonder about saving my pennies for a double stack unit. Dave
  4. From today's images. Wednesday 27 September 2023 Dave
  5. A lucky break in the clouds today but much cloud dodging. I find PIPP is excellent for removing frames with cloud intruding. Dave
  6. Firstly you need a mono camera. I have have used both the ZWO ASI174MM and more recently the ZWO ASI178MM cameras. The difference being pixel size and speed. The smaller pixels potentially give more detail but are slower. Others may be able to advise which is better. For my 80mm Ha scope and 90mm Megrez for white light, the 178 gives better quality but there is not a lot in it. A faster camera is useful when cloud dodging. A continuum filter will give a little more surface detail. A barlow lens is great for zooming in on some the fascinating sunspot groups. Dave
  7. It was your images Ibbo! that started me looking at the 178. Thank you. Dave
  8. Thank you both very much. I now seem to get between 80 and 90 frames per sec having changed the USB traffic and a crop. That is perfectly acceptable to me. By the way, I have been away for just over a week and have just tried the new settings. Even with full frame I am getting ~60 f/s Dave
  9. Thank you. That is interesting. In that way there is plenty of room to crop and have a decent overlap. Dave
  10. Thank you Alan. Very helpful. Next time out I will give it a try. Dave
  11. Thank you Nicholas. I did try a square ROI but it made little difference. I don't know how to do the the other two. My scope is a single stacked 80 mm Lunt. Dave
  12. Seeing some lovely images on here using a 178MM made me look into choosing the right camera for a scope and concluded that with my 80mm Lunt that I would benefit using the smaller pixels of the 178 for full disc images. There is one snag. My 174 will run at 110 frames per second whereas the 178 only does around 18 per second. For a clear sky that is not a problem but when chasing gaps in the clouds it is a different matter. Another snag is that I can only capture around 90% of the full disc and so two exposures are needed. These two images are with a 178. Dave
  13. Thank you very much IB20, laudropb and Sunshine. Your comments are much appreciated. Dave
  14. Thank you. I noticed that there is quite a difference between that region on the full disc image and the one with the barlow even though only minutes apart. There was too much cloud to investigate further. Dave
  15. More images can be seen at https://mysolarpics.co.uk Dave
  16. Very nice. I didn't have any chance today. Dave
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.