Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

Space Hopper

Members
  • Posts

    1,428
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Space Hopper

  1. There may be more than one spider in there..........πŸ™ƒ
  2. I wouldn't think so. I have 5.5" of Fluorite and find the 'E' star routinely difficult, but do see it from time to time. I've not conclusively seen the 'F' star which is much harder, and never got anyway near Sirius B. But my location has generally poor seeing and what i'd describe as 'fair on a good night. I'm also hampered by 56 yr old eyes and am observing at 53ΒΊ north, so i have to be realistic about my chances. I do enjoy chasing these elusive targets down though. I'll get there one day.......πŸ˜€
  3. @powerlord Yes i'm exactly the same. I really am struggling with it all at the moment. Total lack of enthusiasm. Just the one dark site session this year. But i think lots of factors in play here. Awful weather, Bit of depression and seasonal adjustment disorder, shift work, declining health and eyesight, and i feel like the last 4 years have sucked the soul out of me in all departments. And yet, despite all of that, i still feel like buying a new scope / camera & lens.......
  4. Spotting Venus at the point of inferior conjunction (the only time i've done it was during the 2004 transit event. That doesn't count πŸ™ƒ)
  5. Seeing a shadow transit of Titan across the face of Saturn.
  6. Almost an untenable hobby for me. I've only the one scope, but i often think it was a mistake buying it. I hardly seem to ever get to use it.
  7. Found a pic of my old VX12 on its Dob mount, after i'd put the DSC mod on it.
  8. A VX12 F4 would be too much of a handful on an EQ mount, and i think you'd soon tire of it. 14kg may not sound that much, but you have to take into account the volume and sheer bulk of the thing. I've owned my own VX 12 short tube a few years ago now, but on a dob mount. It was a big old scope. Not for the feint of heart in solid tube configuration. It excelled at low power, rich field, wide angle views with good quality eyepieces. This was what i used it for. I never used a CC. And i never considered it a planetary scope as such. The VX had quite a big secondary, and with that aperture, was always too fussy with seeing conditions. My 5.5" refractor is a much better planetary performer, and despite sometimes missing the aperture when looking at those fainter Messiers, i don't miss its bulk and humping it about. If you do go down the road of imaging planets with a big newt, then i take my hat off to you.
  9. Welcome Jessica. You have a total solar eclipse happening on April 8, but its a bit to the north and west of you in NC (Ironically the 2017 event passed right through NC) I hope you get to see it anyway πŸ™‚ These things don't come along too often.
  10. Aperture fever showing several symptoms here i think.......
  11. That looks so user friendly, even i could use it.
  12. Asaph Hall had it easy. Next to no light pollution, good skys AND a 26" refractor.
  13. I'm guessing its like trying to spot Phobos around Mars, but harder still.
  14. I can see lots of lava, but unfortunately no aurora.
  15. Stuck at work so had to pass this year. But in 25 weeks time, i'll definitely be at the IAS show (September 14) at its new venue near Coventry. The mortgage will be payed off by then too, so i may even have some money to buy something......
  16. I thought they'd solved that with the ring thing......?
  17. All i can suggest is not to discount the APM version https://www.apm-telescopes.net/en/apm-2-inch-erect-image-prism-with-fast-lock-and-ultra-broadband-coating Is has a 46mm clear aperture meaning all your 2" eyepieces will do their thing and show NO vignetting. And its a realistic price.
  18. World war 2 vintage ? These are antiques really, and you may damage them if you try to 'open for vlesning' Instead, i would look at getting them professionally cleaned and serviced.
  19. Hi, and yrs, that looks like the same one at a similar price to mine. I think its the same catalogue number too. One difference, mine is a few years older and is 'pre' the fancy BBHS coatings. I also have the big 2" mirror version WITH the BBHS coatings and it performs very well indeed. Regarding the AMICI : i haven't used it really on high power planetary : i always use my standard prism which has a 2.6x gpc 'permanently residing in it for high power planetary. This has a 'quick coupler on it that attaches on to my binoviewer, a Baader Mk5. The reasons why i purchased the Amici were for terrestrial work with a smaller refractor, and also to help me on Lunar observations. I wanted to have a crack at 'the Lunar 100' and much prefer a correctly oriented image to aid identifications of craters etc. I actually half considered the mega bucks Baader \Amici when they released it, but then some sense on my part kicked in. Nearly Β£600 on a diagonal is a bit crazy really. I'm pleased with the 'cheaper' version though. One would assume the newer version with the posh coatings will perform even better. The diffraction spike is only an issue on Venus really. And something really bright such as Sirius , Vega etc. I don't think it will trouble you on the moon. If you lived a bit closer to me, i'd happily lend it to you so you could try it out. The blue and white APM version is a good alternative though. I know a club member who uses one, and it performs very well.
  20. Perhaps worth mentioning that it's quite difficult to make one of these diagonals well. Well enough, and consistently well enough for high power astro use. You only need to look inside one to see the complexity of the thing. Hence the sky high price of the Badder BBHS 2" Amici. With the more budget models you often see a bright diffraction spike through very bright stars etc. I have the 'cheaper' Baader version ; it performs ok, only giving the big diffraction spike on something really bright like Venus or Sirius etc. On Lunar though, theres no issues. Let us know which one you go far and how it performs on your C8 πŸ™‚
  21. This APM 2" seems to have a good reputation. https://www.apm-telescopes.net/en/apm-2-inch-erect-image-prism-with-fast-lock-and-ultra-broadband-coating
  22. I actually often have a hard time seeing Neptune at times, never mind moon Triton ! πŸ˜€ Thank goodness for the Nexus DSC. Seriously though, much respect to those that routinely see it. I've tried many times with 10 & 12 inch Newtonians and my current 140mm refractor without any joy. I don't think I have good enough eyesight now. Then again (like Uranus) Neptune is becoming much netter placed for us in the UK to observe it, so you never know 🫰🏼
  23. I remember my other half occasionally having concerns about the number of telescopes in the garage Dave, back when i owned six. My perfect excuse, and 'trump card' was always, "well, i only own one of them........all the rest are society scopes, and i've been tasked with looking after them for a while....." πŸ˜‰
  24. Only the one (a 140mm refractor) during the last 5 years, excepting a 10" Orion Optics F4.8 Newtonian i owned for a few weeks : I had to sell it, it wouldn't fit my mount. I'm sure there's room for another scope at some point in the future.....? The most I have owned is six. Also own 3 pairs of binocs : Fujinon 7x50 & Canon 10x30, 15x50 is.
Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.