Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_lunar_landings.thumb.jpg.b50378d0845690d8a03305a49923eb40.jpg

rickstanners

Members
  • Content Count

    76
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

5 Followers

About rickstanners

  • Rank
    Nebula

Profile Information

  • Location
    Cheltenham
  1. Hi Derek, Thanks for the comments. I wouldn't be surprised if there had been some rotation. It was a very quick and dirty polar align last night at about 9pm (having had the usual computer related imaging "issues" continually cropping up! ) Rich
  2. Sorry to hear that Stef. How frustrating! I hope nothing too serious with the mount? Rich
  3. Now that I have just about finalised my guiding set up, I took the opportunity last night to actually do some proper imaging, and this is the result. Nearly 4 hours' worth of 5 and 10 min subs, then subjected to my usual amateur processing in PS I would be grateful for suggestions as to how to improve the image. Should I just add more subs, or try for some even longer ones to pull out more colour and detail? I haven't actually added any darks or flats to the image. Would these have a dramatic effect on the outcome? Thanks for looking Rich
  4. Having got totally fed up with an inability to image anything thanks to LP, I bit the bullet and went to find a decent filter. Initially I went for a Skywatcher LP filter, which although it did make a difference, was not really allowing me to achieve a huge amount more than without. I have read that sometimes the type of lights in your area can have a bearing on which filter will work better, so I decided it might be worth having a go with a different one. So next on the list was an Astronomik clip-in CLS, which was also meant to be a bit more 'aggressive' anyway. Unfortunately, with the weather as it is, I can't do any meaningful imaging comparisons (especially over how 'process-able' the resulting images are), but I decided to do a bit of a ground-based comparison. Below is the comparison between no filter, the Skywatcher and the CLS. All images are 30s exposures with the 450D and Megrez 72. No Filter Skywatcher LP Filter Astronomik CLS From this test, it would seem that the CLS will be the better choice here, but I'll just have to wait for some good weather to try it out properly! I will update the thread with the results, if people are interested. It would perhaps be interesting to run some sort of survey on which filters people use in different areas, with different set ups, and different aims (e.g. visual/imaging etc), and see if there's any correlation... Rich
  5. Matt, I can't comment on the DDG version, as I have the previous...but it is a cracking little scope. Really portable and very crisp views. I'm sure you will be able to find plenty of praise for it on these forums. Definitely worth every penny. Look here: http://stargazerslounge.com/imaging-deep-sky/111099-some-dsos-ssp-2010-a.html ...to see what it's capable of in it's own right, let alone as a guidescope (and I am a total beginner at imaging!) Rich
  6. Thanks guys, I really appreciate the comments. I do feel like I really achieved something last week (apart from surviving absinthe night Toby ). It's always nice when you've got something to show your mates when they ask what you were up to on holiday! Rich
  7. Looks like you've got some good help there, so I'll leave you to it. All I would say though is don't try and run it on the AA batteries!!! Total nightmare!! (but sounds like you've planned for that already ) Rich
  8. Hi Alonso RE the moving by hand...I must admit I have done it occasionally on my 8SE BUT definitely not supposed to!! What specifically were you having problems with on the handset? Let me know and I'll see if I can point you in the right direction (though I haven't used the Nexstar mount for a while). Rich
  9. Well I'm back from another great week of astronomy at this year's Salisbury Star Party Probably one of the best bits for me was first light using my WO Megrez 72 for imaging...and seeing subs coming in that literally blew me away! This imaging lark is definitely time consuming, and comes with a steep learning curve, but I was amazed at what that little scope and some good skies could produce in the hands of a total amateur like me!! The set up was the Megrez with Field Flattener III, taken with my Canon 450D, all mounted on an HEQ5. All the subs were either 1, 2 or 3 minutes unguided (thanks to Toby, Dave, Carl, and just about everyone on the campsite who ended up fiddling with my polar alignment ). And a big thanks to Toby (Astrokat) and Dave (Milliways) for their processing help . M31 Widefield M27 Crop of the same M27 image Part of the Veil Nebula Rich
  10. I'll be posting them later on mate...
  11. Great result with your new kit mate! Glad you got some good imaging done with it. Rich
  12. Duly seconded Nick. A VERY nice bit of kit indeed! Rich
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.