Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_2021_annual.thumb.jpg.3fc34f695a81b16210333189a3162ac7.jpg

DarkStar7

Members
  • Posts

    212
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DarkStar7

  1. Thanks for your responses. I feel that very soon a new theory will supersede the Big Bang. One where large scale expansion occurs in balance with small scale contraction (every action has an equal and opposite reaction) where the principles of the Big Bang occur continuously inside the void around us.
  2. http://news.discovery.com/space/cosmic-background-radiation-big-bang-120615.html Sent from my iPhone
  3. http://news.discovery.com/space/cosmic-background-radiation-big-bang-120615.
  4. That's right there are 11 dimensions. I can imagine them all. I just mentioned the common 3d flat space most people talk about. There are 3 dimensions within the Time domain that are rolled up so tightly that we have no chance of viewing directly. They're kind of over an horizon, out of sight like Australia is to England. But they're are people there who feel our part of the universe only as the passing of their Time.
  5. Reading that back I'm not sure if I made my thoughts clear. Basically I'm thinking the slowing of time can be imagined as the Time component of Space-time flattening while the Space component curves, and in stationary or non inertial frames the Time component is highly curved while the Space component is flat. Each component of space-time can only interact when each are curved close to the same degree ie the production of particles. The Time domain and the Space domain are identical but the view from each sees the other as opposite and inverted. The 3D space like dimensions are rolled up in the Time domain but Charge in the space domain can be viewed as magnetism in the Time Domain and Light propergates by oscillating back and forth from each domain.
  6. Einsteins theory of General Relativity is often described using a latex sheet and bending it when a mass is applied. How do we know that space and time curve in the same direction? When I sit here in a stationary position I 'feel' time flowing through me at its maximum rate,yet around me across the universe I see 3D space is very flat. When I accelerate or lie within a gravitation field 3D space is curved but time slows. At a singularity Time has stopped. When Time stops it seems obvious to me that its property Flat. when Space is flat Time is accelerated to its maximum and is highly curved. To me Time is an inverted opposite to Space. Like Yin and Yang. Perhaps only when both the Time and Space domains share equal curvature that both can interact with each other and produce a Higgs field.
  7. All bosons such as the photon are much smaller than any Quark. The smallest fermion would have to have the highest energy because the Uncertainty Principles momentum part of the equation increases if we know more about the location. Obviously smaller particles require a higher degree of accuracy for its location. Therefore the Heaviest fermion is therefore the smallest.
  8. Juliano, but how many times did this galaxy rotate since conception, and how long after the big bang was it conceived?
  9. Looks to me that some objects at the distance where the universe is supposed to be young are no different to objects close by. Perhaps the Universe has always looked pretty much the same despite it continually expanding at large scales. If anything, there appear to be a greater number of more massive energetic objects out at those distances.
  10. http://www.universetoday.com/96344/oldest-spiral-galaxy-in-the-universe-discovered/alice_shapley_spiral_galaxy_art_july_2012_/
  11. As the Universe expands I expect the number of Higgs bosons to increases but each one doesn't last very long.Perhaps the aftermath of some of them appear as cosmic rays. I was predicting the Higgs wouldn't exist. Even now I don't thing it will be found to have spin 0. My hypothesis which suggests we are within a hyper dimensional Universal gravitation field would need the Higgs field to be the 4D space-time turning into the 5th dimension. The Higgs field requires a boson, and my hypothesis requires a boson too,mine is the graviton. It's fantastic because very soon we will have the spin of the Higgs measured... Remember me when they say it's spin 2 please.
  12. http://www.thebunsenburner.com/news/physicists-cern-may-have-discovered-higgs-boson-impostor/
  13. If the spin of the Higgs Boson is Spin 2, would it have identical characteristics to a graviton?
  14. There is something fundamentally wrong with Supersymmetry... Where are all the sparticles?
  15. It's a shame my other thread we are all made of light got locked. Obviously my own fault by the way I conduct myself. Anyhow I came across this paper by Professor Emmanuel Moulay which can show the possibility of how everything can be made from photons. http://fqxi.org/data/forum-attachments/Photon.pdf
  16. Could the Higgs field be due to the curvature of space-time at high energies that causes photons to bunch up and interact and become sluggish with their time slowing and becoming squashed up,turning them into first into gluons and then into a Higgs.
  17. Travelling at relativistic speeds means the distance to the next nearest star is contracted literally. Then if we travel fast enough aren't all objects in the direction of travel squashed up together.
  18. Juliano, How long will it take to have its quantum spin verified to be 0? Where are the sparticles?
  19. http://m.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/07/higgs-boson-breaks-physics/ Interesting link
  20. Determinism I believe is meant in the Scientific community to mean that cause and effect. Fine, but like anything there is a limit and the although the maths equations can dig deeper and deeper our ability to process the information will become impossible. No matter if we had a Quantum Supercomputer working for 24hours, if the weather is in a highly dynamic state ie thundery then predicting where rain will fall after a week with any accuracy would be impossible. I personally think that when a boson turns into a fermion a tiny singularity forms in the centre of similar to how a twister forms in a storm cloud. As space-time curves into the forth 'spatial' dimension we get mass.Understanding the dynamics of phenomena of any singularity with high degree of accuracy (including a twister)is impossible. This why I predict in the other thread that on July 4th the discovery of the Higgs will remain tantalisingly close nearly there.. but they won't ever find it, it will be inconclusive. There may even be a Higgs detection in one piece of equipment but it won't be conclusively proved by all of the devices.They'll say they need more time and computing power. My prediction is that more and more unwanted signals in the measurement will never make the discovery conclusive. The signal around 125GeV I predict will resemble the eye of a hurricane, messy around a edges and calm in the centre. They'll be left scratching there heads saying where is it! I will be very humbled if I'm proved wrong.
  21. I made a mistake on the locked thread by confusing the meaning of the words unpredictability with indeterminism. I thought they amounted to the same thing. Still, if I invited you guys to a BBQ in Sept here in England and told you that it's ok It'll be hot and sunny, I checked it using a Lyapunov Equation.. Could I convince you that the weather would be great?
  22. The scientific community are assuming it is true..that it exists. Although unthinkable it would be very exciting to me because it would raise the profile of the the non Higgs model alternatives. Does anyone have a view of the alternatives models?
  23. For a change I not going to go on and on about unproven alternatives but my money is that the Higgs boson can never conclusively be proved. If the Higgs particle doesnt exist... what next? What do you guys think?..
  24. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=pile-up-particles-obscure-higgs-finding-lhc
  25. Micheal, I obviously confused indeterminism with unpredictability. Oops sorry. Still my point is that Chaos and fractals are disliked because the outcomes of experiments are unrepeatable. Science prefers to have experiments with results that are always repeatable in order to call it a proof. There are many papers like Evans field theory and other gauge theories that are dismissed because the messy maths can't ever prove the theory, yet visually may be much representative of how nature works. I can not prove my hypothesis but it makes perfect sense to me.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.