Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Chris

Members
  • Posts

    10,139
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by Chris

  1. Very nice Ian, especially the last shot with the full solar disk - good Sun spot detail and you can even make out some faculae!
  2. Lovely Stu! I wish you could still get hold of the OMNI range of scopes new, in which case I would have had real trouble choosing the EVo120 EQ5 over the OMNI 120mm CG4 package! I've just remembered I have some spare solar film, hopefully there's enough to make a filter for the Evo
  3. Looks like I'll be adding the 495 Long pass to the list of things to try then Thanks for the heads up Neil, cheers!
  4. I'm sure I heard the L-eXtreme causes halos on very bright stars with Apo's also. Now the L-eNhance doesn't cause halos so I'm keen to see how well that works with the EVo as well as the semi apo filter.
  5. Looks the business Ian! and I see you're using the enhanced motor drive kit for guiding too!
  6. Hey Steve, good to hear from you and I hope all is well with you too! Glad you enjoyed the video, I'm looking forward to having some fun with the Evo : )
  7. I once tried the Contimuum filter for white light and it did improve detail a touch, but I was just too distracted by the green. I've bought a semi apo filter at the same time as the Evo120 and these are supposed to be neutral, looking forward to testing it out.
  8. Hey thanks for posting these! They're better than I expected from the fast 6" fast achromat! Maybe it's worth me popping the Fuji XT1 on the Evo120 after all! Most of the stars look well controlled so I'm wondering if the L-eXtreme cuts out some CA. I've wondered if this would be the case before.
  9. I've heard those TS 152's are well corrected for what they are so I would be interested to see a pic or two from it Looks super nice on the G11 too!
  10. Looks lovely in the classic white Michael ! I nearly went for a 102 f/10 but thought the 120 f/8.3 would be more versatile as you describe
  11. Hands up if you have a soft spot for the good old affordable classic achromat refractor!? Well I do, so after some time without one I decided to rectify the situation. I'm unable to access the planets and Moon from my obsy, so this classic refractor on a motor driven EQ5 will be used to access these to the south (if my neighbour turns his security lights off! Pleural). Looking forward to showing the kids the planets and Moon through this beast, plus some out reach! One or two of the locals have become curious about Astronomy so why not get them hooked by showing then the rings of Saturn...the gateway drug to Astronomy 🤪 (I've also picked up a Semi Apo filter)
  12. Ah thanks Rob I have tweaked it since though as I realised the background was leaning too much towards the red.
  13. Thanks Yes I'm using a stock Fuji XT1 (circa 2014) connected via a Fuji FX T-ring. There is no need to astro-modify Fuji's as they let in plenty of hydrogen alpha just as they are
  14. If mainly interested in DSO imaging then the ED70 AZ GTI (with the wedge, counterweight mod, and firmware update) might be the better option because you can get around the lack of a polar scope by plate solving with software, and guiding works well with these setups. You also have the goto to help locate faint objects to image. You can also upgrade to the ASI Air plus to make things easier at some point down the line. 70mm isn't a great deal of aperture for observing or planetary imaging so best kept purely for DSO imaging. If they would like to dabble with a bit of everything it's hard to argue with a moderate sized 130pds/150p f/5 reflector on an EQ5 mount with basic drive. These have a bit of aperture for the visual side of things, and with regards to DSO imaging you can start off imaging the brighter DSO's with 30 second exposures, then upgrade to the Synscan goto upgrade or Asterion goto upgrade kit at a later date. 130pds/150p will be relatively good for planetary Lunar imaging and observing, just add a Barlow and planetary cam.
  15. Around 1k all in for everything, give or take : ) I'll counter that thought with how likely is a beginner to keep a portable rig if they upgrade to something larger and more capable? E.g. I have a Star Adventurer for portability and widefield, and a more serious rig in the obsy. What if they drop 2k plus on an HEQ5 pro based rig and decide it's not for them. We can spin this several different ways, but I don't think we can find a black and white answer to this because 2-3k is pocket change to some but an absolute fortune to others, and some will love AP and go deep into the hobby and for others an imaging rig might end up collecting dust.
  16. I'm not sure how many people would recommend a several Kilogram camera with a huge megapixel count to a beginner? Your 400D weighs around 500g and has about 10MP. My Fuji XT1 is similar to this too. E.g. a Canon 400D with ED72 plus 0.8 flattener would give you 3.5"/seconds ish. To me this seems like a reasonable pixel scale and camera for someone starting out. (although the 450D would be better with live view) The AZ GTI in EQ mode can handle a the above, and so can the EQM35.
  17. I'm probably not the only one to suggest shorter focal length (more forgiving) setups to beginners, and I feel you don't need an HEQ5 at shorter focal lengths/larger pixel scales. I've personally had bad luck with second hand mounts, it's the one part of an imaging rig I'd recommend buying new. The HEQ5 Pro currently retails for around £950. Putting yourself in the shoes of someone starting out it's hard to jump to the suggestion of an HEQ5 pro sometimes when they say I want to do AP my budget is 300 quid. You need to find a middle ground
  18. I agree the HEQ5 Pro used to be the default answer, however things have changed over the years, and with the advent of the Star Adventurer, Skyguider Pro, AZ GTI (in eq mode), and the EQM35. It's easier to get good results with less expensive equipment. Plus there's the advances in software and camera sensors too. We now live in good times for AP, I remember struggling with an EQ3 that performed about half as well as my current Star Adventurer
  19. Flaming Star Nebula in Auriga - 10 x 10 minutes unguided - StellaMira 90 EDT plus 0.8 RF - Fuji XT1 + L-eNhance Filter - GEM45 mount - Just light frames so rough and ready.
  20. Hi Stefan, welcome to SGL from Chris (also in Suffolk). P.s Zeus looks like an impressive beast!
  21. Ok guys point taken The no filter element was only included to show that 'no filter = bad' I suspect this would have still been the case on with a 1 minute exposure in terms of signal to light pollution noise. If I do a follow up video I can always do a 3x1 minute stack as well as my preferred single 3 minute sub to match the other sub lengths. My thought process was "what do w, x, and y look like with z exposure length"
  22. Glad you liked it I'm confident either the eNhance or eXtreme will give much better results with the Moon about, compared to the cameras UV/IR cut filter alone (Even with 2 minute exposures) As an owner of the L-eNhance (tri band) I can very much vouch for it, however I've only heard peoples positive accounts of the L-eXtreme (dual band) rather than used one myself. The main difference seems to be that the L-eNhance lets in the H-Beta line which the L-eXtreme filter blocks. Now the HB emission line tends to be a lot weaker than Ha because HB takes a lot more energy to emit, so it's debatable how useful allowing HB in actually is? When deciding between the two filters I could have gone either way. I just thought, well it wouldn't hurt having the HB pass there, and you never know it might show more detail in energetic regions? All this talk and I'm now keen to add the L-eXtreme to the collection to actually see if it shows a difference 😆
  23. I quick test/ side by side comparison to see how well these Optolong filters handle Moony Mc Moon face. You could go much more in depth with this with non Moony shots as a control, but for now I simply place each of the 3 minute RAW sub exposures next to each other so we can see the relative difference. I know the L-Pro is more broad band and the L-eNhance is triband so we know which filter is likely to win, but the relative strength of each filter is interesting I thought.
  24. Thanks for sharing such an incredible telescope experience. It really is a beast!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.