Jump to content



  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

11 Good

About JimStan

  • Rank
    Proto Star

Contact Methods

  • Website URL

Profile Information

  • Location
    Western Maryland, USA
  1. It's been a long time since I have been looking at this forum, and I am certainly glad to be back ! I have a question that will pop this thread back to the top of the page. I have the SkyQ dongle for my new Celestron mount. I love how it replaces the HC since I want to be able to control my scope out on the deck, from inside my house on these frightfully cold Winter nights. The dongle appears to work just fine with an IPhone, but when I try to access it with a Windows 7 Laptop, I cannot access it through the wireless connection. This is the case, whether I am working through the "direct"
  2. I never point out my shortcomings to other people. They will often do that job for me! ( Not necessarily true of this group, however ! ) Jim S.
  3. As long as we are talking about Stellarium, I wonder why my desktop computer mouse slows down to fits and jerks whenever I try to run the program ( impossible to move to a target ) while my laptop works just fine ? ? ? The mouse in question is a USB 2 mouse, while the laptop uses a touchpad on the skirt in front of the keyboard to move the pointer around. Anybody else have the problem? Would changing back to a standard corded mouse help? Sorry to hijack the thread. Jim S.
  4. It's amazing how this thread wandered away from the OP's topic ! ( Clear, transparent skies, that is ! )
  5. As others have indicated, you may be expecting too much when you look for a galaxy. Even M31, which is without question, the brightest galaxy, excluding the LMC and SMC in the southern skies, is not going to begin to look like the photographs that you will see here on the forum, unless you have a pretty big pair of binocs, or a richest-field telescope! "Faint Fuzzies", indeed ! Jim S.
  6. I always thought "Independence Day" was about as bad as they got! http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0116629/ Jim S
  7. You don't need a solar filter. You can try the projection method with something as simple as a set of binoculars. Of course a more powerful scope might give you a better view, but don't go taking a chance with your expensive Schmidt-cas or Mak ! It might be a good excuse to get the el-cheapo dime-store refractor out of the closet for one last time! Jim S.
  8. The reducer seems to have been made by Antares ( Sky Instruments ) and is totally out of stock anywhere where I have looked! I cannot imagine that such a device does NOT exist anywhere in the WORLD ! It reminds me of the reverse adapter I looked all over for, for matching a Nikon lens to a T2 thread. Unobtainium ! And yet, a friend had one !
  9. Moon filters are just about the least expensive filter you can get for your scope. Highly recommended if you like viewing the moon. At our public star parties, I usually employ a moon filter on my small scope, and I have had many people say, "that's the best view of the Moon I've seen all evening". I'm sure it is because they are not experiencing the almost overwhelming glare that one gets with an unfiltered scope. ( especially if it has significant aperture ! ) Jim S.
  10. Oh, I bet not all that common. However, the other night, I was testing out my DSI 1 camera on the Moon, and an airliner went across the face of it while I was "looping" my camera. Unfortunately, I did NOT have the "capture" process running, so I missed the photo of the century! ( at least for me, it would have been ! ) I suspect that the event is rare enough to make one's hair rise up on the back of their necks, when it does happen. I know mine did! Jim S.
  11. I bet there are more than a few of us hams on this forum. I know there are a lot of amateur astronomers on QRZ ! Jim S. AG3Y
  12. Not exactly an eyepiece question, but I have been searching EVERYWHERE for a .5 focal reducer that will fit on the end of a 1.25 eyepiece, like a filter. I thought I had a source for one, but he refunded my money after an almost one month wait. A friend of mine has also been experiencing no joy. I should mention that we want to use these with photo equipment, so recommending a longer eyepiece is NOT the answer. Does ANYONE know if the things are still being manufactured, and if so, WHERE can we get a couple of them ? A U.S. source would be preferred, but European or Far East would be
  13. Sounds like you have already made up your mind, but let me reinforce your decision. I have a friend who is heavy into photography ( takes GREAT pictures ) and thought that astro-photography would be just like his other subjects, and quite easy to achieve. So he hooked up his Nikons to several different OTAs and in short, has had a TERRIBLE time trying to get a good astro-photo ! He is extremely frustrated, because he thought he could jump in with both feet without learning his way around the sky! I believe you have made the right decision. Learn your way around the sky, and figure out w
  14. At our big public star party at the Antietam Battlefield, a small group of high-school aged girls came up to my scope. "What cha got in your scope, Mister ?" "Oh, the planet Saturn- - you know the one with the rings ." Well, they had never seen Saturn, much less any planet through a scope, so they rather nonchalantly looked into the eyepiece. "Nonchalant" , that is, until one of the girls REALLY noticed the rings! "OMG OMG OMG ! ! ! there are RINGS around that thing ! " "Ohhhh, let me look, let me see !" It was probably a moment that they will never forget. I know I certainly won't for
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.