Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

fwm891

Members
  • Posts

    4,112
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by fwm891

  1. I did spend quite some time after getting the SA aligning the reticule on as distant an object as I could. Took quite a lot of very small adjustments before I was happy that rotating the mount whilst looking through the polar scope showed absolute minimal movement of the central cross hair. If your using a phone app to locate where Polaris should be placed make sure you have the correct settings in the app. Mine has a visual setting and a telescope setting - one being 180° from the other.
  2. Yes, just the polar scope. Used a phone app to locate where Polaris should be and set the mount accordingly.
  3. Hi Graham, The subs were circa 100s, that's determined by the mount's firmware. I'm using the original firmware which when I connect the camera to the 'snap' socket on the mount gives - fits header says 99.4s. Note: the bloating round the stars is caused by primarily two things: the condition of the lens and the full spectrum mod on the camera making it more sensitive to IR/UV which doesn't focus to the same point as the visual spectrum.
  4. I decided last night to try my S.A. with an old 400mm Tokina 400mm f5.6 lens on a Nikon D5100 mono modified body. Although I have the Pro version of the mount I decided to just mount the camera/lens on a ball head rather than the the dec shaft and counter weight. I pointed the lens at M51, focused by zooming the image on the camera's live-view screen. I set the iso at 1600, shutter to bulb, connected a shutter release cable to the 'snap' socket on the mount which gave me circa 100s sub frames. There is a firmware update which allows other variations but I'm using as supplied at present. The image is a central crop of the frame. 45 frames were shot and 34 selected via PI's blink viewer taking out frames with aircraft/satellites etc. No darks, bias or flats have been added. No DBE to even the background. Frames integrated and histogram adjusted. Will try again with the lens/camera mounted on the dec shaft with everything balanced out.
  5. Just bought a CEM60 standard and tri-pier (where's that postman...) ?
  6. Steve - responded to your message - thanks. Francis
  7. Will you be getting the CEM 60 standard model in - approx. when please Francis
  8. I'm using a TS 80mm guide scope with a Lodestar with no problems. Rather than using the short rail that came with the TS guide scope I took the rings off and put them as far apart as a could on the main OTA. That took out all the vibrations coming from the single stalk under the supplied guide scope rail. I've also added a pale yellow filter (a UV/IR cut filter would be better) before the Lodestar to reduce and focus difference between the red/blue which helps slightly in sharpening up the guide star.
  9. Looking very Tudor - black woodwork?
  10. If your saving the sono tube then yes it would be difficult, might do it adding multiple layers as poly sheet will slide against itself quite easily, or put a cloth layer round the sono, then a poly layer...
  11. Wrap the sono in polythene tightly first that will give you a smooth barrier between the sono and the CF. Or I think TS do a CF tube for 10 inch optics. https://www.teleskop-express.de/shop/product_info.php/info/p10113_TS-Optics-Carbon-Composite-Tube-Upgrade-for-GSO-254-1250-mm-Newtonian.html They do others
  12. A telescope is computed to operate at infinity only - therefore in general that's it at it's best . Camera lenses are computed to work over a range and therefore not at best at any distance. Go with a scope everytime
  13. Welcome to SGL. Great start and 3 M's in the 1st photo ?
  14. Look at the Canon EOS M100 too
  15. Managed to get a short run with the Lodestar installed last night (need to look at SharpCap settings!), anyway sequence of 50 frames shot with a gap of 4 secs between frames. I've stacked the first and last frames in Photoshop CS3 with an image of M1 to approx. same scale (not my image). The arrow shows the drift in 4 mins 7 sec (from timestamp). Drift is mainly due to poor north alignment. I made no adjustments later when viewing M1 at x62 (1250 fl with 20mm ep) for 5 mins. So need to sort the north alignment and fine tune the tracking speed (Oh and remember to re-set the platform when it ends a run... ?)
  16. Thanks ALL. Out again briefly, again rain stopped play but at least I was able to confirm the variable drive rates through an eyepiece. When (and if!) there's a longer spell of clear stuff I'll pop my Lodestar in and capture a short animation. Biggest problem I think is going to be getting a good north when I put the platform down. Might try and make a little jig to take the right-angle finder, or a wooden tripod to fit the rocker-box foot holes with a finder on top... Life would be so much simpler if I didn't keep thinking up things to do!
  17. New controller arrived today and installed. Works fine, from mega slow to see it rotating! ? Soon as I could see a couple of stars I set the platform up, rotated to Vega being the brightest to get a initial speed indication. Let it drift then pull it back in with the controller. Adjust the controller to give me a tracking speed. Kept Mars in the centre of fov for a good while at x180 - strated to rain so further test will need to wait... ?
  18. Just run some calcs on the controller - it's giving me x1.3 the correct PWM pulse width required for sidereal motion whether set to max or min potentiometer settings... Kaput I think. It was a cheapie of the bay. Just ordered something more substantial. TBC.
  19. It cleared for a while and things started well @ circa x180 (14mm + x2 barlow & 1250 mm fl) I started making pot adjustments, turning drive off then back on, increasing speed to recentre stars, adjust down to track ? - then there was this distinct 'POP' from the PWM controller ? speed output went to max regardless of the pot's position. Mmmm back to *bay for another controller or something better? TBC...
  20. Looking good Dave - I have a 750x750 screw-driven WorkBee - great machines ?
  21. Electrics now in place and tested. I've timed it over measured distances on the sectors - waiting for some clear sky now to try it in anger. The push-to-break switch is very sensitive and stops everything as soon as pressure is applied. Two blocks come together to set the beginning of travel point. Still debating the pivot point, whether to stay with the ball bearing or switch to something more positive. The flashing led is quite dim so shouldn't cause any headaches.
  22. Aluminium rod arrived today so I've got the two main rollers machined up. The brass stub shaft's need finishing to length but I wanted to have a dry fit first. The motor drops into the recess and will have a fixing plate to hold it in position and fine adjustments. Few photos:
  23. Sorting out the electrics today while waiting for the metal to arrive. I'll run this off a small 7Ah 12VDC battery - need a couple of push-to-break switches. There will also be an on/off switch and a (dim) red led. Not sure whether to put the led in the hand speed control or at the power entry... Make some short legs to go under the baseboard to bring the eyepiece height up a bit. Then sort out a seat, then...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.