Jump to content

stargazine_ep35_banner.thumb.jpg.a7c1791d7e682021778de0def357bdbb.jpg

Nova

Members
  • Content Count

    663
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

11 Good

2 Followers

About Nova

  • Rank
    Proto Star

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Sompting, West Sussex

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Thanks Robin. This is the option I chose. Just seemed to btight even with the settings right down. Something that I have thought though. The QHY5 is a mono camera and I know colour was set to 255 and the saturation was up a bit. I didnt event think to turn these off/down being so used to using an SPC900. Could this of been the cause?
  2. Hi all, Firstly, I love Sharpcap so a massive thanks for continuing to update it Im after a bit of help. I finally got round to upgrading to V2.1 the other day and had my first chance to try it out with my QHY5 last night after reading it is now better supported. Firstly I get 2 options when connecting to the camera either "QHY5" or "CMOS QHY5" One gives me lots of options to tweak similar to when using my SPC900 and this is the one I was using but I could not get the exposure down enough. I had Jupiter on the screen but I could only achieve a white ball or a very bright ball with visible moo
  3. Hi allI can remember seeing this thread back when it started its great to see it is still alive and being added too. Im now in a position to be able to do this mod to my own HEQ5. Im just wondering if anyone has looked at or tried the mod kits from Rowan Astronomy? These kits keep the 9:47 ratio which really apeals to me as I want to still be able to use the handset. Available for HEQ5 and NEQ6 http://rowanastronomy.com/products.htm
  4. Yeh. Spending £330 have just shelled out £520 is a bit too much of a stretch. Don't think the motors and board are available on there own. Cheers though. I have made enquiries about returning the standard mount and purchasing a syntrek instead. I can then purchase the EQMOD unit for it at some point.
  5. Cheers guys. As I thought then. Posibly should have spent the extra £150 on the syntrek
  6. Santa bought me a shiney new mount!! Im curious if the Standard HEQ5 can be used with an EQMOD unit such as this one http://www.rotherval...-mod_d4579.html ? I think im going to be out of luck and have to upgrade it with the goto kit as I dont think the standard motors will be up to it but the item on RVO mentions only HEQ5 no mention of pro or syntrek versions just threw me a bit so thought id ask the question here
  7. Badgers are you using a 150P? Are you using the supplied with 2" ep holder to insert the t adapter into? LukeSkywatcher if your using a frac it is probably all different anyway. Have a 1.25" adapter which will take the filters but it adds to much length to the light path so I don't have enough inwards focus travel
  8. After a bit of help. Recently aquired a 450D which although is going to be a family camera (had to justify it to the wife somehow) it will also be used for AP. If I remove the 1.25" eyepiece holder from the focusing tube of my 150P I can screw my T ring onto the focussing tubes thread and attatch the camera directly. This works a treat and achieves focus without any issues but I can not attatch filters with this configuration. I have the stock 2x barlow which came with the scope and that doubles up as a T addapter when the lens is removed from it. In theory I could use the thread on the end of
  9. Hi Yidoboy, you have practically the same set up as me is yours the 150P or the PL? (looks like you may be just down the road from me too). Thats actually not a bad pic at all. Just out of curiosity are you using an ir cut filter on your SPC? Photoshop is great for tweaking images but if you dont have it you could try GIMP which is free and although does not have all the features of PS is still a good piece of software. Feel free to take a look at my Flikr page to see what I have managed with the 150P so far
  10. Cheers guys. Coma! That's it. Was trying to remember what it was called.
  11. M13 taken with a Canon 450D on a Skywatcher 150P and tracking EQ3-2. A total of 7x30sec. Stacked in DSS with darks and bias frames and processed and cropped in CS3. Happy with my first attempt, the full image shows some distortion towards the outer edges has given me the urge to try other objects.
  12. Sorry Bottletopburly and cantab, for some reason I didnt get an email about your reply. The transit happened on friday 3rd at 23:25. I have had mixed success with the Stellarium satellite plug in. One of my PC's which has the most recent version showed the ISS being way off and another which has the previous version was spot on as far as I could tell they were set up the same in terms of location, When the ISS transits the moon or sun it is a very narrow corridor from the center line that it will be visible from. For example in Worthing I was around 4Km south of the central line but I know the
  13. Yeh, is a little daunting to start but once you get your head around what your trying to achieve it does get easier. Different opinions arise probably because evryone finds there own way of doing it which is slightly different to the next person. Practrice is the key and not being afraid of it
  14. Cheers guys. No, no DSLR available. I've done my homework and am pretty confident I know roughly the line it will take across the moon but realise there is going to be an element of luck involved. And of course predictions aren't always spot on. Cheers again. If I get anything worth sharing ill post it up
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.