Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Charming Potato

Members
  • Posts

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

39 Excellent

Profile Information

  • Location
    Berlin, Germany

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Thank you for sharing your insight. Unfortunately, at this time I do not have the money to spend on this hobby. I guess I will stick to the easier targets for now and keep learning with what I have. Thank you!
  2. Hello. Jupiter is visible at a favorable spot at night these days. I was wondering if it is possible to image it with a kit lens 50-250 @250mm F6.4 with a DSLR crop sensor (Nikon Z50, APS-C)? If so, what is the optimal way of doing so? Imaging? Video frames? Is it required to take calibration frames for it for it? Specially flats since I have some smudges on my camera sensor and lens. What program is used for it? From what I have seen, all the images are taken as videos using a dedicated astro camera and some sort of scope. I found the following images where it was still shots stacked somehow? I do have SA GTi mount.
  3. Finally, after weeks of waiting, we had clear skies the other night and I was finally able to get out for imaging! Here's my first attempt at M31 from my backyard. Nikon Z50. 50-250mm kit lens at 135mm. 100 lights @90secs, 50 dark/bias/flat frames each. Star Adventurer GTi. Siril for stacking and processing. I started the imaging session right as the sun set, so by the time I set up and finished polar alignment and connected everything, it was already dark. The first 15-20 shots were a bit bright for some reason, I don't know why that was the case (I started shooting 1 hour after sunset), but Siril took care of it in stacking compared to DSS which had a worse sort of result. I took 15 darks right after that since the temperature was going to drop by about 4-5 degrees Celsius, so I took these around the beginning of the session, and the rest at the end of the session. Was that a good thing to do or did I waste my time? Also is there a way to go past 90-150 seconds of exposure with SA GTi, or do I definitely need a guide scope for that? I think my polar alignment was quite spot on, but when I was going through the pictures, I did notice that the center of the image has moved quite a bit in some of them. Which I'm guessing is tracking errors?
  4. Thank you everyone! I had another go at the same target on a different night, but this time I went with 37x120 seconds exposures at 100mm F5 rather than 150mm. I used Siril to process the image this time and I am much happier with the result. I used Starnet to remove the background and for stars reduction, and it was much better! I did learn that this is not a very good target for unmodified camera in a light polluted area, so I'll try a different target next time, but overall I'm very happy with Siril. Here is the stacked image of this new attempt: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Veox_W6nJ9VU_MEnmZozeIl2Avygm5YG/view?usp=sharing If someone can process it their way, I would like to see how my attempt compares to experts here so I can understand what I am missing.
  5. I finally got the chance to test my mount. Unfortunately, I couldn't connect to my RPi because it wasn't connected to the WiFi and I didn't want to configure it to run its own hotspot again, so I decided to just go with the mount's (SA GTi) tracking. After polar alignment, I issued the goto for NGC7000, which seemed a little bit out of focus because I had the lens at 250mm. Ended up using 155mm, which was my first mistake; I believe it zoomed in WAY too much. Then halfway through clouds came so lost about 10 frames, and then lost about 30 frames because dew started forming on the lens and I didn't notice it and that was my second mistake. Nikon Z50 Star Adventurer GTi Nikon kit lens 50-250mm @ 5.3 132 x 30sec (including the frames blurred by dew) 39 flats, 20 dark, 92 bias frames I'm also bad at post processing, so any help would be really appreciated as this is just my second picture (first with a tracker). This was shot from a Bortle 8 area.
  6. Thank you so much! I will try adjusting to north inside see if goto is working as intended. EDIT: I pointed it roughly towards true north, and now goto seems to be going in the right direction! I can't wait to try it out once this thunderstorm goes away! Thank you @Elp and everyone else here for all the help, I really appreciate it!
  7. Thank you! That helped and it seems to be balanced on both axis now! Luckily I got my portable power station as well today (Talentcell 72W 100WH as you suggested), so I was able to connect to test if everything works and it seems good to go! I tried going towards a target just to test, but the goto was WAY off of it, and I believe that is because I didn't polar align it yet? It's day time, and unfortunately there seems to be cloudy skies throughout the week, so won't be able to do anything this week, but just wanted to test. Two things I wanted to confirm as I couldn't find them in the manual: 1. Do I need to tighten the RA/Dec clutches after they're balanced? Like tightened to the point where I cannot manually move them and let the motors do the work? 2. Attached picture is what I believe should be the "home" position of the mount. Is this correct? EDIT: One more thing, let's say my latitude is 65.123123, that means I need to skew the polar wedge to 65 on the polar scale, right? If that is the case, is this considered a low or high altitude? Because it says to equip the counter weights in a different position if your latitude is low. I tried finding it out but couldn't understand it.
  8. So I got my SA GTi today (yay). Now I tried assembling the mount with everything attached, and I am having trouble balancing it in DEC axis. In RA it is okay, but when I tilt the camera 90 degrees on the DEC, it becomes weight side heavy. I have tried making the weight go as far up as possible, but it doesn't have the capacity to go above 70% as then it starts to hit the polar alignment dial and the body of the mount. I believe it might be the attachment I have for the camera to connect to the mount. I got this quick release plate: https://www.teleskop-express.de/shop/product_info.php/language/en/info/p9348 . It doesn't perfectly sit in the mount's mouth (?) and I think this might be the reason why I cannot get it to balance in the DEC axis? It is also too low so the camera body hits the tightening screw that holds the plate onto the mount, so I have to put the camera not parallel to the plate. Maybe I am doing something else wrong? EDIT: I read @Elp's comment after I had ordered everything, so I'm more and more certain it is the attachment that is holding the camera. If that is the case, is this a good dovtail plate? https://www.teleskop-express.de/shop/product_info.php/info/p237_TS-Optics-Dovetail-Mounting-Bar-Vixen-style---100-mm-slotted-hole-and-1-4--screw.html
  9. Oh, I'm dumb. It was right in front of me and for some reason my brain decided to ignore it. Thank you so much! I think I will go ahead with this setup.
  10. That's perfect, thank you. So that means it can be done without the cable? Over WiFi I believe?
  11. I don't see that in the manual on page 4: https://inter-static.skywatcher.com/downloads/sagti_manual_rev8c.pdf I believe my question wasn't clear. What I wanted to ask was that do I need a special plate/equipment to mount my camera to the head of the mount?
  12. I'm not sure if it transmits data over that port. I've tried looking into the manual but can't find any info. Searching through internet I couldn't find anyone who uses it with a cable. I guess I'll just have to figure out a way to connect it somehow through Bluetooth or Wifi.
  13. Thank you everyone for the great suggestions. At this point, I'm thinking I will go with the SA GTi. The kit comes with a tripod and pier extension. And I feel like this is a very good investment that will last me a while, and it is much easier to operate (from watching the YouTube videos at least) and offers a lot of features out of the box. There are a few things that I wanted to clarify if possible: 1. I use Nikon Z50, and apparently it is a very bad camera in terms of connectivity. It doesn't even feature external intervalometer (at least the wired ones), so there is no way to connect it to a computer or mount to increase the exposure times from 30 seconds. Is there a way I could connect it to a computer/mount to increase the exposure time? I have a RPi 4, and I was planning to connect everything with it using Astroberry, but this seems to be the only problem I am facing. There are no cables available for it as far as I can see. 2. SA GTi does not come with any sort of plate (I don't know what it is called) to attach the camera with, would it be possible if someone can help me understand what exactly do I need to buy for it? Something from here would be nice just to give me an idea: https://www.astroshop.eu/mountings-accessories/mounting-plates-and-rails/15_55_50?page=1 3. What other cables would I need other than a USB -> RJ12 to connect the mount to a computer? 4. Would I need to invest in a portable power bank other than the one I have (https://www.anker.com/eu-en/products/a1268?variant=41510216335550)? I'm sorry for all these questions, but looking at all the options, I don't understand what to get and what not to get.
  14. Thank you everyone for such great input. I do want to mention that I do not know what future has in store for me, but for now I am very much invested in this, and hopefully will be in the future as well. When I was a kid, I saw milky way patch/belt one summer night when I was visiting the country side, and it was etched into my memory until recently I was able to see it again, and that is when my interest in this hobby developed. It was a Bortle class 3 area, and I wanted to capture what I was seeing. I started getting more and more interested the deeper I went into research for that. Anyway, so reading through all the great suggestions, this is what I have understood: 1. AZ-GTi mount is a good portable mount that can later be converted into an EQ mount by using some add on accessories. It is going to be better in long term compared to Star Adventurer 2i. 2. Star Adventurer GTi is an alternative of 1, except it is dual axis tracker, and goto capability out of the box, but does not have the expandability route that mount 1 has. Did I understand that correctly? If not, please correct me. Otherwise I have the following questions if you guys don't mind: 1. Is AZ-GTi out of the box a better option than SA 2i? Like this one for example: https://www.astroshop.eu/alt-azimuth-with-goto/skywatcher-mount-az-gti-goto-wifi-with-tripod/p,55177 2. Since SA GTi is an EQ mount, do I need to have a computer and/or guide camera to track on the second axis? If yes then it means without a computer and/or guiding, it will only track on one axis and there is not much difference between this and 2i? To be honest, AZ-GTi seems like a lot of work to make it function like the SA GTi. If that is the case then I'm more between SA GTi and 2i. Otherwise please correct me if I am wrong.
  15. Are you sure it is 12V and not 5V? https://www.astroshop.de/fotomontierungen/skywatcher-montierung-star-adventurer-2i-wi-fi-photo-set/p,68887 According to this, it requires a 5V power input. Plesse correct me if I am wrong. This is the power bank I have: https://ankerbd.com/product/anker-powercore-select-20000mah-18w-fast-charge-power-bank/ It seems to provide 5V and 9V, and 12V at lower Ampere. Do you reckon this would be enough to power it up?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.