Jump to content

DSviewer

Members
  • Posts

    55
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DSviewer

  1. awsome thanks for sharing gives us all encouragement to keep going
  2. thanks for this off to Astrofest next weekend may see something there as well and will post if anything useful.
  3. Nice setup looking at the Askar or William Optics ariound 500-700 focal length
  4. Anyone have experience with Celestron binos thinking of some for backyard observing
  5. Looks great I don’t know python is there a user friendly in the plan
  6. Go to astrobackyard good source of info as starting point and also goes into focal lengths against targets
  7. Sorry to ask but any plans for 2023 UK
  8. Wow looks pretty serious I’m jealous you have the space. I guess your running power direct to it ?
  9. I was looking at some celestron skymaster 25x 70 or 15x70 thoughts
  10. Hi problem you have is the focal length as you say the majority if not all Wi-Fi scopes are around 1000+ you could just get say M31 in with but if u want wider field you need < 750 SKYMAX-102 (AZ-GO2)
  11. Canon EOS 60D Astrophotography has a larger ISO-range than Canon EOS 500D. Canon EOS 60D Astrophotography has an ISO range that stretches from 100 to 51200 while Canon EOS 500D has 100 to 12800.
  12. Hi there after quite a few hrs we searching an reading a very good reference byCharles Braken deep sky rage would be < 750 focal length for good range of Nebulae Ans Galaxies but offset with wider field of view. Astrobackyard has good chunk of info
  13. Great setup would the APOs have better color correction than a doublet or can this be addressed post imaging .
  14. Silly question all but how safe and reliable no hand scopes looking myself
  15. Looks awesome I was thinking about an AM5 they are v expensive but broken back is irreplaceable. I have not heard any out of band tracking errors with these
  16. Good to know is it worth some sort of thermal covering
  17. Apologies is late and an odd question so I am guessing that the ZWO 266mc pro should require less exposure time over the 294 correct and less noise.
  18. Looking forward to seeing lots new kit and seeing if any organized events
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.