Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_2019_sp_banner.thumb.jpg.a0ff260c05b90dead5c594e9b4ee9fd0.jpg

jwr

Members
  • Content Count

    74
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Good

About jwr

  • Rank
    Nebula

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.monkeyonabicycle.com/

Profile Information

  • Location
    57º N, 2º W
  1. Yes - I saw it too. I was photographing Mars at the time and it was bright enough to make me look up from the scope. It came straight overhead and almost went from horizon to horizon. Bright yellow trail, becoming greenish as it passed. I suspect it was quite shallow as I didn't see it come apart instead it faded to dark red, then disappeared. Spectacular. J
  2. I think you're just a bit mixed up with the terminology (bigger v smaller). A fast scope is one that has a lot of light-gathering capability. The direct measurement of this is the f number. A fast f5 scope will gather light quicker than a slow f10 scope. The f-number is the ratio between focal length of the scope and diameter of primary mirror or lens. So, a scope with a longer focal length (smaller field of view) needs a correspondingly bigger primary to maintain the same f-number. For a given focal length (and telescope design), a faster scope will typically physically bigger than a slower scope. James
  3. jwr

    First Jupiter

    Thanks all for the positive feedback, as I say there's a lot of room for improvement, but I was pleased. JohnC: I think 'barges' are the name given to the dark patches (vortices?) that circulate within the atmosphere.
  4. As Jupiter was looking so clear and brilliant last night I thought it'd be rude not to try imaging it. Normally I'm a deep sky imager, so planetary imaging is something I'm still learning. My first few attempts were thwarted by by scope still cooling down. After about 45 minutes things stabilised enough to start to get reasonable focus and shoot some stable video. The result is: Jupiter 500 frame stack by jwrfooo, on Flickr Shot with a SPC900 & 2x barlow, processed in Registax and PixInsight. I know it doesn't compare to most of the images on here, but I'm rather chuffed with the result. Not sure if I've pushed the processing a bit too much, so I may revisit the data again when I've had some time to think.
  5. @shaunster: your guard-cat looks ferocious... James
  6. That's a cracking start - I love a bit of time-lapse. I haven't tried any astronomy related projects, but here's a couple of my past efforts: Farm landscape Flower opening Can I ask what equipment you've used? I was planning a sequence in which I mount my SLR on a extension arm mounted on my telescope. That way the scope and night sky remains fixed in the FOV and the landscape moves as the mount tracks. James.
  7. That's a very nice result. I'm still waiting for the skies to become dark enough to test my TS OAG. Do you find that the prism slider mechanism is a bit prone to coming loose and becoming wobbly? I might look at modifying mine a bit once I've done some test runs. James.
  8. [deleted] - I should probably read the subject more carefully... James.
  9. I've had a 925 for about 6 months now and am very happy with it. After a few months of use it's now being upgraded whilst the Scottish nights are too bright. I'm mainly an imaging person, but do enjoy the odd visual session. My upgrades / accessories so far are: - Celestron f6.3 reducer - Bob's Knobs collimation screws - Baader solar film - SI Feathertouch focusser (still waiting for this one) The rest of my kit is in my signature.
  10. Celestron 925 visual setup by jwrfooo, on Flickr Celestron 925 imaging setup by jwrfooo, on Flickr Moonlit scope by jwrfooo, on Flickr
  11. Truly stunning. Do you know what the 'filament' looking feature is about 1/3rd of the way down on the RHS? Is this part of the galaxy, or something separate? James
  12. I feel your pain Michael. 57N is bad enough at the moment but 59N must be completely useless. James.
  13. jwr

    DSO

  14. That's spectacular. Really great depth and rich colours. James.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.