Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

libraryman

Members
  • Posts

    855
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by libraryman

  1. Hi all, it’s been a while since I’ve posted, travel and weather all conspired against me!

    so I’ve decided that I might go smaller on my imaging rig....that means losing the eq8 losing the Tak...and the Berlich tripod for something portable..

    so what’s the best small mount out there?

    will it take say a 60mm Tak..guider and QSI camera?

     

    Ray

  2. Hi all, i need a little help here....

    im trying to process the Cave nebula complex...its wide field, Reduced FSQ106, QSI 583..

    i know the data is good..and im not an expert but neither am i a novice but im really struggling to get this subject right...

    ive tried Pixel math in various combinations...ive tried Images plus...ive tried PS and Hue saturation and clipping masks but i just cannot get the seperation of O111 Sii and HA correct.... or lets say as i want it!!

     

    is this target just plain difficult or what!!...i have 12 x 20mins of HA and 30 odd each of Sii and O111all 20min subs...enough i would have thought...

     

    any suggestions would be appreiciated but please please dot tell me to get more data...im fed up now....lol!!!

     

    Ray

  3. Hi all, indeed it was so easy to convert, I had some 2 years ago tried a brief foray into using my qhy5Lii on the QSI but abandoned it.....why oh why did I do that?

    The Caméra was actually very close to focus and with the longer fl....Tak reduced to F/3.8...it has improved the accuracy of my guiding....

    the out of focus Lum filter is still used for auto focus and SGpro allows me to pause guiding during focus routines!

    Ray

    • Like 1
  4. Thanks all for the replies...it is correct to say the prism is in front of the filters, however; when the filter is changed, the focuser offset means that the focuser May travel in...or out...and it’s thisaspect that changes the guide scope focus!

    ive fitted it for a trial tonight...I’ll set it up when thescope is infocus for the ha filter, the Astrodons I have are not perfectly par focal, but close enough...it’s the Lum filter that I use for focusing that might be the issue.....if focus is out by a good margin on the lum, it won’t matter...but yes...I agree...pause guiding during auto focus...if it actually works in sgpro!,,

     

    thanks again all

     

    Ray

  5. Hello all, can I ask if anyone uses a Qsi wsg camera off axis?

    ive had my 583 for years and always used a guide scope...I’m considering putting my qhy 5Lii mono in the guide port but I’m wondering how my  filters will effect focus when I change between narrow band and lum for focus routines 

    anyone knowledge of this?

     

    Ray

  6. In my opinion, it's about the marketing hype that has been perpetuated by the belief that the Takahashi is "the" telescope to own if you wish to obtain the best images!

    the simple truth is that just like any telescope; the Tak range are susceptible to manufacting issues!

    The importers try to peddle the lie that Tak's are perfect and no issues ever arise because of the care and attention taken during manufacture.  Of course there can be issues and problems, it's a fact of life but they are less than willing to accept it and given the difficulties of assessing and proving an issue in the great British climate along with the other contributors (camera sensors) uiding issues etc, it can be difficult to resolve issues.

    Ray

  7. I've had this short video on my iPad for some time, I took it after stripping down a Takahashi fsq106ed focuser!

    Its not complete and the sound is weak, but it gives some idea of how the design is supposed to reduce flex!

    After  reading this post I thought it may help owners to understand the innards of the focuser and the mechanics of it..

    nothing to be afraid of but care has to be taken on reassembly of the linear bearing carrier back onto the tube.....slow and careful.

    the point is that removed from the scope, one has a much better feel for adjusting the 4 grub screws that control friction on the pads.

    after adjusting the pressure via the 4 grub screws; the focuser in the video felt much smoother and tighter!

    Ray

          

    IMG_0651.MOV

    • Like 2
  8. Yes, I use the losmandy plate with the Eq8......…i would suggest removing the central clamp and replacing it with a ratchet handle, its much better and you can tighten them properly, once my ratchet handle is tight the two remaining clamps are just finger tight.

    Ray

  9. Late to this thread, but I was worried about my fsq106ed (new Q) and oval stars!

    I decided to make a proper test using CCD inspector!

    The advice is to take 10 or so 20 sec sub's..taken from a fairly rich field devoid of globular's and nebula...unguided .....stack them together in CCD inspector and then look at the curvature n tilt.

    The logic being that guiding etc will distort the stars.

    This should eradicate the sensor and the focuser tilt as being the cause of oval stars which it did for me, though I did also use a DTI to measure all sorts of movement, including the Captains wheel effect, which turned out to be negligible.

    Aside from this, there are a set of grub screws on the side of the focuser that you can adjust to just stiffen up the focuser (on the 106 at least). Though friend of mine has loads of wobble on his FSQ 106 and has not been able to remove it by this means.

    Frustrating issue with Taks !

    Ray

  10. "The cold finger is very easy to do, I do mine with a 2mm aluminium plate and grind the sensor contact area with a Dremmel tool till it fits on the sensor gap (about 1.3mm) but you also have to modify the camera's chasis (nothing special...) I don't have the measurements here now but I'm thinking on making a detailed tutorial on how to do the full cooling mod on the 450D once I have some good free time"

    I made my cold finger out of 2mm copper...yes, a little heavier but no doubt a little more efficient! i have not yet completed the cold finger mod still waiting for a bit more info on the connections and trying to decide whether i should put the body into a box or go with the aluminium heat sink on the side of the camera!! decisions..decisions!!

    Iv'e attached a couple of photo's for the measurements, the black cover is thin self adhesive Teflon tape to prevent electrical contact with the sensor. the small screws are to fix the cold finger to the sensor frame.

    they fit perfectly.

    Ray

    post-1155-0-03152400-1403293789_thumb.jp

    post-1155-0-54928600-1403293901_thumb.jp

    post-1155-0-44009200-1403293924_thumb.jp

    • Like 1
  11. Given the very limited space and delicate borders, it almost requires robotic accuracy to control the process!

    If when using a rotating head, I would think that one needs to set a depth or pressure and move the sensor rarther than the rotating head, more control that way but so difficult to achieve.

    Ray

    • Like 1
  12. I think that might have been the one I bought (well bought 2 actually).  I think it was a 2A one.

    EDIT ---  Found it - and yes, it was MCPE-127-10-25 :)  Works very well though I forget what temperature I got down to.  It will be in one of my cooling threads :D  I'll have the answer again soon though when I put an 1100D in the cooler instead of the 450D,

    Excellent Gina, thank you

    Ray

  13. Still looking out the bits and pieces to make up the test rig.  Can't find the Peltier TEC I was going to use - a 12v 3A one from Farnel and more efficient than the Chinese ones.  However, I do have a 3.3v 2A one (TEC1-4902) about 7W I/P power and a 50mm square CPU cooler.  I have that setup running now and the cold side has already collected a thick layer of ice :)

    Hi Gina, are the 30x30mm tecs efficient enough for cooling the cold finger? I have 2 12703 & a 12706 both 40mm sguare, I looked on farnell's site for the 3 amp one but struggled to find it, have yo a link to it?

    Ray

  14. Well, at some point one loses interest. Whatever 'Skywatcher' or 'Synta' is, they don't understand QC. I'll stop there for now. If you buy an Astrophysics product the buck stops at Roland Christen. If you buy a TEC it stops at Yuri Petrunin. If you buy a Takahashi it doesn't stop if you don't speak japanese. You just have to rely on their QC. Buy their optics but not their mounts.

    Interestingly, EQ8 discussion on the French forum is very much along the lines of, 'Hey, it's cheap, what do you expect?' That is why I don't buy things in France. There seems to be no culture of, 'You are selling it so it has to work. If it doesn't, take it back.' The EQ8 I just bought cost 3/5 of the price of the new car I bought seven years ago and which has delivered seven years of solid service with no signs of not delivering seven more. For goodness' sake, this is not a tripod with a head motorized in two directions, it is a car with a turbocharged, fuel injected engine, ABS brakes, airbags, electric windows, sound system, catalytic converter...

    Olly

    Well said

    Ray

  15. Olly, from what I understand, Sky-Watcher is a brand name of Synta, which is a Chinese company. The agents in the separate countries are merely importers and distributors, nothing more.

    This may indeed be the case, however when one distributes a product, it is an inferred confidence in the quality of said product, because the distributors name and goodwill is attached

    No?

    Ray 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.