Jump to content



  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

11 Good

About Mark-mck

  • Rank
    Star Forming

Profile Information

  • Location
    East Midlands
  1. oh and make sure you take the cover off the scope lol. i've forgot to do that myself and i've heard a few other stroies on here of people forgetting that too.
  2. i know exactly how you feel i felt the same. but i'd hold out a little longer, like i said wait till you get a chance at the moon, get the moon in your FOV and try it out on that. being as you've already aligned the scope and finder i'd probably say it was down to focus. on my celestron argos job i got for xmas its so easy to miss focus you really wouldn't belive you could go past focus so easily. so move the focus knob very, very, very, very slowly. and hopefully that should give you some views. and if thats not the problem then i'm not in a position to help as i'm a newcomer myself but ther
  3. thats really good. tons better than my attempts, you actually have the horse head coming through. i can just about manage 60s subs unguided at the min so if i get a chance this week i might try ansd grab a couple of hours worth of data. its one of my favourite DSO's
  4. firstly have you aligned the finder scope with the main scope? i do this in the daytime on a distant object such as a chimney or top of a telegraph pole. and secondly if you've already done that the next thing i'd suggest you try is wait till the moons out and try the scope on that, its easy enough to eye the scope up on it if the finders out, then once you have the moon in the center of your FOV check your finder again and hopefully you'll be pretty much aligned. and one more thing to think about is focus.... it's very easy to go past focus so when your turning the Knob do it slowly and aslon
  5. Hi Mike. could you be a bit more clear as to what you mean by your getting nothing, do you mean your not able to see anything in the EP? MArk
  6. that's tip top. going to have to think about building one myself in a few months, mount will be required for an apo at some point but i'm never getting rid of the 250, its a beast.
  7. i also have to agree on the NEQ6. i've got a 250pds mounted on it and it seems to handle it fine. i've had a few images i'm happy with out of the set up. and as regards weight i'd guestimate the mount and tripod weigh in at about 35-40kg, i manage that easily moving it from the shed to where i set up which is about 15ft, not sure i'd want to carry it much further tho. and height wise the mount stands at about 3-3 1/2' high with out the legs extended.
  8. hi valleyman. unfortunately I can't help you out with this one as I'm still trying to figure it out myself, but thought I'd say hello so you know your not on your own. hopefully someone will point us in the right direction.
  9. Evening all. i'm contemplating investing in the QHY5 as mainly a guide camera and also to try a bit of planetary imaging. thus far i've been taking unguided images of dso's i'm happy enough with what i've been getting but know that guiding is not far down the road. i'd welcome any feedback on the QHY5, mainly i'd like to know if it's a good guide camera and also if anyone has any images taken with it i'd appreciate that too. Thanks in advance. Mark
  10. Hi Gemma and welcome to SGL. you'll be getting a lot more than just black in those shot's you'll be taking . best kick any habbit's you have as you'll be needing the money to fund your AP addiction, trust me you'll get the bug once you see your first decent image. Mark
  11. Hi Lana and welcome to SGL.
  12. i'll probably get ridiculed for this but watch a couple of episodes of startrek, and compare to where we are now, with an open mind you'll see were getting there very rapidly.looks to me like gene roddenberry managed to get a bit of time traveling done.
  13. being as it's already been imagined then the answer is yes!, we just need the will and technology to do it. in my life time? most likely not! as i understand it one of the biggest hurdles we need to get over in respect to traveling to the stars is fuel, the faster you go the heavier your mass becomes so you need more fuel to go faster/maintain your speed, hope i've got that right. i think the future lies in anti-matter! and being as currently we can only manage to produce tiny ammounts of anti-hydrogen were a long way off, but having said that we havn't had a major technological breakthrough f
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.