Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Artur Torretti

New Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral

Profile Information

  • Location
    Portugal

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Thank you guys for the answer so far. @Rustang @alacant stunning images , congratulations. Its way more than I expected, of course there are more factors than the lens, but yeah its amazing. I will keep looking for some good deal on the ones you guys mentioned. Thanks again Cheers
  2. I will definitely give it a try. The takumar ones and carl zeiss seens to be the most expensive ones ( and probably good), all the "ok" prices has some kinde of flaw like fungus or haze. Maybe iam not looking properly hehe. Also , there are other brands like tokina, pentacon and the ussr jupiter that are not that expensive, but looks decent!
  3. Helli eveyone. Despite reading the forum a lot in the last weeks, it's the first time I post. I'm a beginner in astronomy/astrofography and after collecting some advices here i kind have a plan about the setup I want in the future. But for now, i want to buy some lenses to use with my canon 700d and get more astrofography feeling. With that said, I would like to know which lenses you guys advise me. I was thinking about a Canon 50mm 1.8 that second hand costs about 90 euros, but then I saw the vintage lenses in Ebay, which are more affordable ,so i was thinking about a 135mm or even 200mm, or maybe one of these and also a 50mm vintage. Oh, as they are m42 mount, will all of them work with a m42 to eos adaptor i might have problem to focus with different lenght ? Thanks in advance
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.