Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_beauty_night_skies.thumb.jpg.2711ade15e31d01524e7dc52d15c4217.jpg

Piers127

Members
  • Content Count

    83
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Good

1 Follower

About Piers127

  • Rank
    Nebula

Profile Information

  • Location
    Langdon Hills, Essex
  1. For visual use there's not much benefit in going for an EQ - hence the popularity of the Dobsonians. I've just sold my Synscan AZ mount and it was great for observing when aligned properly, and really that only takes a few moments with 2 star alignment. I also used it for imaging and managed M42 on 45sec subs quite acceptably. I've kept the scope by the way, which is, you've guessed it, a Mak 127. On the subject of focal reducers I wouldn't bother, there are other threads on here that explain better why, but the rear aperture on mine restricts the field of view. I think these now ship with a 2" back, so the aperture may now be improved. Best to ask FLO!
  2. Piers127

    Hi from Essex

    Hi, welcome to the forum!
  3. I received my spiral Turn Left at Orion this afternoon and it has been a revelation for me! I've seen Ms 13, 27, 57, 92 and NGC 6826 all in the space of an hour. Have pics of some of these and viewed through the scope and where possible the binoculars too. Would never have tried without the book. I love it. But then again, I'm a beginner. :-/
  4. Thnaks guys, I'll bear what you've said in mind. Scope it is, I'll save for better aperture!
  5. Hi, I'm considering buying a refractor for wide-field DSO photography. I've seen the SW Equinox 66 Pro on FLO and wondered if this would be a sensible investment or if greater aperture would pay more dividends if I save a while longer? Would the 66, say, have any serious advantages over my 100-300 f5.6 Canon lens? If not, would it be sensible to use the camera lens instead? Any help gratefully received.
  6. Viewing for Jupiter was excellent last night, but I had to go to bed before it cleared properly. Also caught Uranus, my first view. Never fails to get the blood pumping when I see something new for the first time, and for me that means I have a lot of excitement to come!
  7. Clear blue skies here in Basildon after a rather foggy start. Let's hope it continues through the afternoon and evening. Rather too much wandering cloud recently for my taste!
  8. Another great M31. Fantastic detail! Must get busy...
  9. That's amazing! I have a 550d and was starting to think I would never get decent astro shots through it, but you've renewed my enthusiasm! Is your 500D modded at all?
  10. Interesting, Heavens Above doesn't list a transit at the time I saw. Reckon some debris, then. Quite interesting.
  11. I stand corrected, thanks! Meteor or satellite I have no idea, I'll check out the link, cheers!
  12. I just saw a meteorite! Shot across from right to left just above Algol. First I've ever witnessed. Wonder whose satellite that one was...?
  13. Ordered it! Not missing out - my local Waterstone's had a paperback 3rd edition on the shelf but I remembered a new one was due so held back. Glad I did...
  14. Great, I've just tried and can now get in. Looks like I need to sell all my belongings and be very quick...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.