Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

Ewan

Members
  • Posts

    2,827
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by Ewan

  1. Usual rig:-
    152mm Tecnosky Refractor F5.9
    AZEQ6-GT Mount
    Baader 135mm D-ERF
    Daystar Quark (giving F30)
    Daystar Interference Eliminator
    Point Grey IMX174 5.6um
    Seeing 5/10
    Genika Astro, AS!3, ImPPG
     
    Added an ImPPG screenshot showing how to obtain this look if anyone is wondering.
    104 captures, 250Gb of data for this animation.
    Start time 2:56:46 PM End 3:52:30 PM
    12 second captures @ 6Ms, Gain 14000, Gamma 1, Mono 8Bit
    Resolution 1280 X 1024
    165 FPS
    Atb
     
     
     
     

    ACTIVE REGION 2.png

    ACTIVE REGION.png

    AR3296 eruption.gif

    AR3302 AR3301 2.png

    AR3302 AR3301 INVERTED.png

    AR3302 AR3301.png

    Fillie.png

    NICE EJECTION.png

    PART 2.png

    ImPPG Settings.bmp

    • Like 22
  2. 152mm Tecnosky Refractor F5.9
    AZEQ6-GT Mount
    Baader 135mm D-ERF
    Daystar Quark (giving F30)
    Daystar Interference Eliminator
    Point Grey IMX174 5.6um
    Seeing 5/10, through thin clouds at times
    Genika Astro, AS!3, ImPPG
    30 second captures usually at 6Ms, best 10% of frames stacked.
    Managed a few sets of varying data, none taken through clear blue skies so lucky to get anything.
    All captures are only 8Bit, some of the captures taken using RAW mode as even at full resolution the IMX174 can hit 163 frames a second.
    Atb & have a great Bank Holiday
    AR3289INVERTED.thumb.png.9919c327ce2f9238b260ae0567878141.pngAR3293CLOSEUP.png.6c12118d8b52b2a7fe74546f178ea166.pngAR3296AR32972INVERTED.thumb.png.e3f79e6b149d5bc54a65ed3d0b00027c.pngAR3296AR32972.thumb.png.d2ec31f5f9d669952d23d23108e629c4.pngAR3296INVERTED.thumb.png.195e6a8624b1e6ad668c869f07f85d65.pngAR3296LARGEFOV.thumb.png.a546fa8150fc28b963b45ba5a099400a.pngAR3296QUARKOFF.png.1a28555e46412132d0d3ba15c6b41df8.pngAR3297AR32932.thumb.png.30a92c701fd8be631d0e1baea4428bbe.pngAR3297AR3293FALSECOLOUR.thumb.png.2d29da4369eefe7c76145a10e1a08bbc.pngAR3297AR3293INVERTED2.thumb.png.dfe8528cc2a798e899319aedc59cd29a.pngAR3297AR3293QUARKOFF.png.d3fa2ce3e00ca08359aa50343776f932.pngAR3297CLOSEUPINVERTED.png.002d153982daf0e39bed5929e4911ec6.pngAR3299AR3294INVERTED.thumb.png.99456b5fc865118e58033d2aef3a7b75.pngFILLIE.png.3301e595a9482f60bda806625233e2f9.pngPROM2.thumb.png.c4ae746f8d23f1812008d9012cb8dae6.pngPROM4.thumb.png.a689646b94caaaba7f911c45c3162777.pngPROM10.thumb.png.01fd750f384ad87785324fdde437e018.pngPROM12.png.adf3631270fc7635a3954d889656a746.pngPROM13.png.e666c035c256514ef9d912e516ff9776.png
    +16
     
     
    Like
     
     
    Comment
     
    Share
     
     

     

    • Like 11
    • Thanks 1
  3. 10 hours ago, Alan White said:

    Amazing to see these, thank you for sharing.
    I have just bought a 152 5.9 in Altair Red for Solar WL,
    But now its setting the Quark idea off once again...

     

    Thank you, not long after getting the 152mm & IMX174 & posting a few images it seemed like a lot of imagers went the same route, it is a good setup & the 5.6um with the camera is a good match for the 152mm.

    Only thing i will stress about the Quark if you own one then you really need to do test runs with the heater settings to find what one is best & it may not be the best for all sessions either.

    Atb

    • Like 2
  4. 11 hours ago, Rusted said:

    Stunning detail and an incredible sense of perspective. :thumbsup:

    Your seeing conditions must have been truly extraordinary at the time you captured data for these images.
    This is not to take away anything but breathless admiration for your skills.

    Will solar imagers now descend on Hastings? Like they do for an eclipse? 😊

    Buy Daystar! Quark sales will be going through the roof! :wink2:

    Honestly the seeing for that day wasn't that good, cloud dodging at times plus the sun seemed to have that 'high white misty' look to it, i was surprised at some of the detail. I do captures at 3-6ms & limit them to 30 seconds only.

    I did make a small change to the amount of tilt & did an 'on band test' before capturing.

    • Like 1
  5. 4 hours ago, TakMan said:

    Phenomenal imaging Ewan - wish I could get to that level ! 👍
    I'll have to pick your brains at some stage...
    Are you an AS! / ImPPG processor or using that AstroSurface(?) software...
    Super going anyway - something to aspire to 😀

    Clear skies...
    Damian

    Very kind, thank you.

    I use Genika Astro for captures, AS!2 314 64Bit (think thats correct) for stacking & just ImPPG for processing.

    As my 152mm is only F5.9 the ratio would be a little low for the Quark tbh, i went with the 135mm D-ERF as its clear aperture is 125mm so with the Quark it my rig is at F30, having read quite a bit over the years & trial & error i masked the scope down to 100mm to get to F38 but still testing this out tbh.

    Been testing the heater setting on mine & on the 17th found that -3 gave the best on band display. I also altered the tilt amount on the Interference Eliminator to about 50%, i can still see very faint banding but nothing a flat frame cannot sort out.

    Trial & error & testing your kit pays dividends in the end.

    • Like 2
  6. On 22/04/2023 at 09:48, maw lod qan said:

    I know the words incredible and amazing have been used, but, those images are.

    When you  can see the power of Sol up close like this it's almost frightening!

    Your right Maw, it is what drew me away from DSS imaging, that & lack of sleep 😉 

  7. On 21/04/2023 at 08:33, David Smith said:

    The weather certainly is a challenge. See you've not lost your touch though, great set.

    Hi buddy, the weather...cor, it's been something else hasn't it, I remember about 5-6 years ago it rained sI'd for 13 weeks, got to be good soon surely.

    Some half decent seeing played a large part, as it's still not that warm I started the heater on -3 instead & it seemed to give best results, I also changed the tilt applied to over half as I am sure it can cost you in making the bandpass wider giving less contrast.

    • Like 1
  8. It's been quite a while since i have posted here, new things, new media, busy life & terrible UK weather, but i shall endeavor to remedy that.

    My solar season got delayed by about six weeks with the constant rain but finally managed to get some afternoon sun on the 17th April, well worth the wait & the Quark got to stretch it's legs once more.

    I tried running the rig at F38 but not 100% i noticed any difference to be fair, i plan on doing some F ratio tests when i get the chance though.

    Atb solar peeps

    THREE PANE MOSAIC.png

    ACTIVE REGION 2 - Copy.png

    AR3281 3 - Copy.png

    AR3281 FALSE COLOUR.png

    AR3282 3 INVERTED.png

    AR3282 3.png

    FILAMENTS.png

    INVERTED PROM 5.png

    LARGE PROM.png

    LONG FILAMENT 2.png

    • Like 27
    • Thanks 1
  9. 9 hours ago, MalcolmM said:

    Agree with the others. Absolutely stunning videos! How long in real time are they taken over?

    Malcolm

    Cheers, roughly an hour. Those particular 'events' were extremely fast on my capture screen in real time so best bet is fast exp time for less time otherwise you can end up stacking blury frames, I was at 6 or 7ms on those 2 but tbh honest 3-4ms for 5 secs would have been better.

    • Thanks 1
  10. 38 minutes ago, newbie alert said:

    If it's been a while you certainly haven't got rusty... Cracking images and awesome animations... What's your setup?

    Been a good few years now i think, one thing & another i kind of lost touch with this place.

    My setup is AZEQ6-GT  152mm Technosky Achromat F5.9, Baader 135mm D-ERF, Quark Chromo & Point Grey IMX174 mono camera.

    • Thanks 1
  11. 1 hour ago, Davey-T said:

    Interestingly on Gary Palmers solar imaging talk last Sunday he said he gets better results with AS2, don't think it can handle the ZWO ASI178 images though ?

    Dave

    For sure Dave, I noticed it a while ago, I knew 100% I had good data, put it through AS!3 & got a very blurry image, tried !2 & it was fine. Ive probably binned good data because of it

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.