Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_30_second_exp_2_winners.thumb.jpg.b5430b40547c40d344fd4493776ab99f.jpg

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 26/12/19 in Posts

  1. 45 points
    Well and truly blowing my own trumpet here, BBC Sky at Night magazine made one of my lunar images their image if the month for Feb 20! I'm dead chuffed as I've never ever been in print before, not even in the local rag! The image I submitted is this 6 pane mosaic of the waning gibbous that I captured back in Sep. Thanks for looking
  2. 26 points
    Uranus is the seventh planet in relation to the sun and was accidentally discovered. Although it is visible to the naked eye, the planet has long been mistaken for a star because of its obscurity and slow orbit. Due to the distance to Earth and the few exploratory missions, much about Uranus remains a mystery to us. But what has already been discovered makes this planet one of the most intriguing ever known. Between 21-year seasons and diamond showers, see some of the facts that make this planet one of the most fascinating in the Solar System. Like Venus, the rotation of Uranus rotates from east to west, the opposite of the direction in which the earth and most other planets rotate. In addition, the planet's rotational axis is tilted at an angle almost parallel to its orbital plane, making it appear to be spinning sideways. Scientists theorize that this rotational anomaly may be the result of a gigantic collision between Uranus and another celestial body, such as an asteroid. Due to this strange rotation of Uranus, the seasons on this planet last about 21 years! This causes huge variations in the amount of sunlight that the planet receives at different times of the Uranian year. Think of a planet where summer lasts about 21 years, receiving sunlight all the time, while winter has the same amount of time, with the planet in total darkness and freezing cold. In Uranus, day and night exist only during spring and autumn. These strange seasons pass through Uranus during its year, which corresponds to 84 Earth years. Meanwhile, the day only lasts 17 hours. If you think Saturn is the only planet in the Solar System to have beautiful rings, then Uranus also has two sets of its own, totaling 13 rings! The innermost set consists mainly of thinner and darker rings, while the outermost one is made up of two colored rings, one blue and the other red. In addition, Uranus has - as far as we know - 27 moons, and instead of being named after deities of Greek or Roman mythology as usual, they were baptized with character names created by Willian Shakespeare and Alexander Pope, such as Miranda. , Oberon, Puck and Ariel. The speed of Uranus's orbit is 27,400 kilometers per hour and its mass is 14.5 times that of Earth. The atmosphere of Uranus consists mainly of hydrogen, helium and methane. The surface temperature reaches negative 216ºC. The bluish color results from the absorption of red light from methane in the upper layers of the atmosphere. In the attached photo we can easily see the lighter region of the South Pole, inclined practically 90º as the costumes dictate. Capture made under median seeing conditions, using a Long Pass 610 nm filter, the lighter polar region was very evident, while the dark zone the different shades are probably processing artifacts. https://www.astrobin.com/l5vk98/B/
  3. 21 points
    The galaxy NGC4216 is in the Virgo Cluster about 55 million light years from Earth. It is shown in the center of the LRGB image below with two main companions NGC4206 (top) and NGC4222 (bottom). Also displayed are a few background galaxies. The inclination of NGC4216 is 89 degrees so, it is almost edge on, making the revelation of dust lanes difficult, so I was quite pleased that I managed to capture a few details. I've also inserted an annotated version which shows the location of the background galaxies (if there are any PI experts who know how to stop PI writing different annotation identifiers to the same object please let me know.....). The image represents 12.5 hours integration time and was taken with my Esprit 150. Alan LIGHTS: L:19, R:12, G:14, B:30 x 600s. DARKS:30, BIAS:100, FLATS:40 all at -20C.
  4. 20 points
    After seeing a few threads with people posting their 2019 images, I thought I'd have a go at mine. More than I thought and some better than others! In no particular order, here are them all. Thanks for a great year and a great forum, the help I have received has been invaluable. Clear skies Adam.
  5. 19 points
    Wednesday was blue skies and for once it did not cloud up by five pm. Decided to put the Nikon on my 150pds and have a go at taking my first DSO picture. M31 is a single image of 180 seconds at ISO 800. I sent it to Bukko for critical examination and he very kindly asked his son to see if it could be tweaked a bit. A little bit more detail of the dust lanes became apparent. Next opportunity I will try to grab a whole bunch of these and try a stack for the first time. Marvin
  6. 18 points
    Hey everyone Up until now I've been using my Star Adventurer and taken a few reasonable images until my lens fogged up and I had to pack up and come back inside. Santa was kind to me this year and got me a second-hand HEQ5, 72ED, flattener/reducer & dew strap with controller. Somehow the clouds managed to stay away for a couple of hours yesterday evening and I was able to test it all out. Below is my final stacked image of Andromeda using: 50x 2-minute exposures 25x darks 30x flats 50x bias It's my first time using flats and bias, I'm not sure the flats came out right but I'll keep experimenting should we ever get some nice weather again! I'm really pleased with the final image but think my Photoshop skills need to significantly imrpove. Cheers Nick
  7. 15 points
    Was driving my gran back home after a family get together and noticed the lovely sunset. Decided to go down to the beach and see if I could catch the Moon and Venus's reflection. Taken on my phone so resolution is not great. Tommy.
  8. 14 points
    Imaged with the C8 and Starlight Xpress H9-C, using the Altair quadband filter. Total integration 155 mins. I have been experimenting with combining an earlier full spectrum with the narrowband image and I think the result is rather groovy! According to the colour mapping the red-orange represents ionised hydrogen, the green oxygen and the magenta sulphur.
  9. 13 points
    I decided to stack everything I have on the Pleiades from the day I started shooting it and I have a total of 22 hours and 35 minutes. 457 exposures ranging from 2min to 10min shot with, DSLR (600d), CCD (QHY10) and cooled CMOS (ASI294MC) through my TS65Q. It took APP 40 hours to stack them all. What do you think? Emil
  10. 13 points
  11. 13 points
    I managed to get half an hour of observing yesterday evening, just after sunset and just before yet another band of cloud and rain hit mid Wales. The scope is an early eighties 8.5 inch F7 (ish) newtonian that I purchased last year. It arrived in a near mint condition mechanically, which soon became understandable. In fairly typical Fullerscopes fashion the telescope had been put together incorrectly and I wasn't able to get anywhere near focussing my eighties vintage eyepieces, or indeed any other eyepiece, even with the longest extensions I could find. It is sad to think that a succession of owners have probably tried to use this scope and then given up without realising that the fault was fixable; I moved the primary mount as far down the tube as I could, re-drilled the focuser hole a bit further up and installed a focusser with a longer back-focus. The main mirror was pristine, with no signs of ever being washed or scratched in any way. However, they both needed re-coating (the secondary was semi-transparent) and I got the whole scope back in order for the new year, appropriately mounted on a Fullerscopes Mark IV and with my late-eighties 26mm Vixen plossl. So, only a short period of time for viewing before the clouds, but the skies were good, though not excellent. I have always liked the simplicity of longer-focus newtonians, with simply collimation, cheaper eyepieces, no coma correctors and edge to edge pinpoint stars. Having given away my 14 inch and 20 inch dobsonians I am also focussed on smaller scopes and everything they can yield for deep-sky observing. The initial results were excellent M33 - easily visible and showed good size and some shape. A hint of spiral arms possibly. Mirach's ghost - popped straight out with no difficulty at all. The tight stars really seemed to help here NGC891 - I hadn't intended to even attempt to go for this given the sky conditions and it was an addition after seeing how well Mirach's ghost looked. A relatively easy sight in averted vision, with a distinct needle shape against a pretty rich background of stars, lovely M37 - a favourite of mine and very well displayed in the eyepiece. Lovely tight stars right across the (relatively narrow) field of view and the single brighter star (apparently ) in the centre of the cluster shone like a jewel. That was all I could manage before the clouds, but I think I have bagged a good un. Smaller, long-focus newtonians really do have a place in deep-sky observing and while they are difficult to source new, they can still be found for little money on the second-hand market. I have had the Mark IV mount since the late eighties and while it is fun to have a period scope, I will possibly re-mount the reflector onto a dobsonian at some point, as I did for my 10 inch. Jonathan.
  12. 13 points
    This is just two nights of data capture - not nearly enough for this object.....but I have already moved on. Total 12.5 hours (ha 5, OIII 4 & SII 3.5 hours). Full info on my web site....if interested. Since it is not imaged very often....I guess a little is better than none at all. (I do hope I can come back and add to this....but it won't be anytime soon). It is quite noisy - but I will blame the moon for that
  13. 13 points
    The Pleiades from Aosta Valley on Christmas Day. Sony A7r3 with Canon 20-35 (hence bad coma) - 15 sec at 2.8 3200iso https://www.astrobin.com/bkc01k/?nc=user Blended with a 30 second exposure
  14. 11 points
    EGB 4 (a nebula discovered by Ellis, Grayson, & Bond in 1984) is NOT a comet, despite it's comet-like appearance. It is an emission nebula surrounding a catacylismic binary star system called BZ Cam in the constellation of Camelopardis. It has an unusual bow-shock structure as BZ Cam (with it's associated wind) moves through the interstellar medium, similar to the bow wave in front of a ship that is moving through water. BZ Cam is believed to be a white dwarf star that is accreting mass from an accompanying main-sequence star of 0.3-0.4 solar masses. It is around 2,500 light years away, and has a space velocity of 125 km/second. I can only find one previous image of EGB 4 online, a NASA APOD from 2000, so I believe this could be the first amateaur image and thefirst colour image. Yes it's incredibly faint! Astrodon Blue: 15x300" Astrodon Green: 15x300" Astrodon Lum: 20x600" Astrodon Red: 15x300" Astrodon OIII: 25x1800s bin 2x2 Astrodon Ha: 56x1800s bin 2x2 Total Integration: 48 hours Captured on my dual rig in Spain. Scopes: APM TMB LZOS 152 (6" aperture 1200mm focal length) Cameras: QSI6120wsg8 Mount: 10Micron GM2000 HPS References: apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap001128.html THE ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 115:286-295, 1998 January © 1998. The American Astronomical Society. aanda.org/articles/aa/full/2001/36/aa1385/aa1385.right.html
  15. 10 points
    This was a quick set of 2 minute exposures taken with my Esprit 100 and Nikon D300 @ ISO 800, just before packing away my stuff at silly-o'clock the other morning. I just wanted to see what I might be able to capture with this combo as a reference for a future more dedicated imaging session. Processed in APP and PS CC. This is a slight crop of the original image. It was great fun trying to identify individual galaxies!
  16. 10 points
    Here is my first attempt at the flame and horsehead with an unmodded canon 650d dslr, a SW 72ed refractor and star adventurer. Very noisy but will add more data. It is 1 hour and 7 minutes of integration under bortle 8 skies. 135x30 seconds at iso 1600.
  17. 10 points
    Acquired 90 minutes of data before 2019 ends. This target was also taken around the same time last year but with 40 minutes integration time only, giving me a hard time to bring out the fainter nebulosity. This time, with twice amount of data and good sky condition, I hope I didn't push the image too hard. SW150/750, EQ3 Pro, D5300 30 seconds exposure Processed in DSS, APP, PS
  18. 10 points
    The last two nights I managed to catch panels to the south (including the Statue of Liberty nebula) and north of Eta Carina in order to make a three panel mosaic. Not the easiest endevour with a Star Adventurer mount. So no fancy platesolving software helping me out. Also PI refused to put them together, saying it could not find matching stars, so I had to do it manually in PI. Here is a preliminary version just to show you that I am still alive and kicking down here. It is downsized to about 1/3 of the original but I am sure it will still take half-an-hour to upload. Now I will make a little astroimage show to show before midnight on a screen on the beach, where I and the other inhabitatnts of the station will wait for the new year to come. Happy New year to you all! Göran
  19. 9 points
    first solar pics of the new year for me , darn weather. nice prom on the upper off going limb. seeings not the best here but im happy to get anything to break my luck. kit starwave 102, quark, asi120mc. thanks for looking. clear skys. charl. prom upper oncoming limb. prom upper off going limb.
  20. 9 points
    I wanted to have another session before new Moon, but had little expectation for this morning. I looked at all the weather sites I usually look at yesterday evening (AccuWeather, Clear Outside, BBC Weather app, Met Interactive Weather Map) and all indicated just about 100% cloudy for the narrow period I had to catch the Moon before doom. Of course, ever the optimist, I set the alarm for 6.00 am this morning. I didn't even look through the window before I got up, I fully expected it to be cloudy but had decided the night before to get up anyway just in case there was a small hole in the cloud. Went up the steps out the back of the house with the scope not even glancing up. I couldn't believe it when I set the scope down, glanced up - to see a perfectly clear sky with a slender crescent Moon just about six degrees above the SE horizon !! I have to say though, the seeing was really pretty bad, not surprising really with the low temperature and the low altitude. Having said that, the seeing didn't detract from how beautiful it looked, and even more so as the Moon rose a little bit when I could see Mars about 8 degrees to the right and a degree below the Moon. As the dawn started to break the azure blue just above the horizon made it all an outstanding spectacle. I took numerous snaps before packing up at about 7.40, hoping I would be lucky and that one of the shutter releases would coincide with a micro-moment of better seeing. The only pic I obtained I could do anything with is below. Taken at 7.79 am, SW 80ED, AZ5, Olympus E-M5 Mk11, 1/80 sec at 400 asa. Have a look at the limbs of either version and you will see how bad the seeing still was. Very pleased to have added one to my sequence. One more opportunity tomorrow morning, but not according to the weather forecasts. I'll be up anyway just in case and I'll know then how many times I've taken pics and observed during the lunation. Very pleased with the opportunities I've had however it turns out tomorrow.
  21. 9 points
    Although the comet will be getting closer to the double cluster around 27-28th Jan, I took the chance to grab an image last night as the weather for the next week doesn't look hopeful. 6 x 2min subs @ ISO800, Canon60Da and 60mm refractor.
  22. 9 points
    Hi all! The purpose of this unboxing/review is to.. 1. Show you the fit and finish and the physical appearance of the equipment 2. Also to give you an idea on how well it is packed 3. Of course also review the optical performance, to the best of my ability, when this damn lid of clouds that has been covering the south of Sweden, clears up. Warning: long thread Previous experience with telescopes: Celestron Nexstar 102 slt achromatic refractor So I've been in the market for an apo for quite some time now. Wanted to get a good middleground scope to serve as both imaging scope and for visual use. So my eyes fell on the TS Optics 115 triplet F7 apo. Stated OTA weight is 6.5kg. Not sure though if it is with or without tube rings. Teleskop Express had them on offer for €1349, an already good price. Suddenly an exhibition ex appeared for €999, which was opened and shown to customers in their store. So last Friday I placed the order, the same evening at 18pm it was shipped. Today, Monday, it arrived in Sweden the day before New Years eve. Pretty good Other than the apo, I also ordered a bundle with 38mm 2" 70° eyepiece and a 2" 99% diel. diagonal, and a deluxe findershoe to fit on the focuser. Today I've been walking around with a smile all day I've added lots of pictures both on the products but also on the packaging, which I feel is very good and protective. The overall sense of quality, fit and finish is beyond words, simply outstanding. And yet this is not an expensive apo. The coating on the tube is matte white which I believe is powdercoated. The focuserpart is piano black with a finish that I could lose myself in. Focuser motion is stupid smooth. And the diagonal and eyepiece also give a very good impression. I cannot wait for first light! I hear that there should be some holes in the clouds tonight, but I've got a mancold so frankly I am not up for it. Glass used in this is Fpl51/lanthanum glass. Focuser is 2.5" rated for 5kg load vertical. I've read good reviews on this scope so my expectations are high. Also I believe it is the same scope as Astro Tech 115 F7 triplet and Altair Astro 115 F7 triplet, although they come with more accessories. Okay folks. This is all for now. Hoping to be able to test it under the stars soon. Hope you don't mind all the pics. Cheers.
  23. 9 points
  24. 9 points
    Almost embarrassed to post this but hey ho, managed 30 mins Ha, 10 mins Sii and 5 mins Oiii ... Through misty haze but always wanted to do this one ! Quick DSS and PS levels / curves
  25. 8 points
    Reprocessed again without flats. Only a short number of lights as I lost a load due to high clouds :(. 19 Lights, 40 Darks. Processed manually in PI with final framing in Lightroom. M81 & M82 Final V2 by Andy Thilo, on Flickr
  26. 8 points
    Here is my 3rd and final pic from Monday nights wide field imaging test session. IC410 the tadpole Nebula and IC405 the flaming star nebula, really pleased with the field of view on this as its the perfect size to just capture both. 12 X 10 mins in Hydrogen Alpha with my Atik 460EX CCD & Altair Starwave ED70 refractor + Lightwave 0.6 reducer bringing it down to F3.6 @ 250mm FL. Guided, captured, stacked & stretched in MaximDL, processed in Photoshop. Lee
  27. 8 points
    Prompted by the interesting reports from alanjgreen (4 supernovae), Cosmic Geoff's comet report and recent reports from others I managed to have a look with my 200 mm f/5 Newtonian + 0.5ish focal reducer and Lodestar together with Starlight Live and Jocular. The only one of the four possible supernovae that was above the horizon was the one in NGC 4441. I was a bit surprised how bright it was. I think it must have brightened but did not find any data. It's close to the core and very obvious. The comet (C/2017 T2) was visible too and I managed a snap. Had a bit of look at a few other things including the Webb Deep Sky Society's Galaxy of the Month for January 2020, which is NGC 2563. https://www.webbdeepsky.com/galaxies/2020/ The finder chart is useful for identifying some of the other galaxies in the field. https://www.webbdeepsky.com/images/galaxies/ngc2563/ngc2563_finder.pdf While the sky was clear I could not resist a look at some of the old favourites in Orion. The Horsehead and Flame Nebulae for example. Observing and recording The Flame Nebula benefited from Jocular's scan and exclude subs. There were some intruding trails on some subs (dotted, so an aircraft, I assume). Next question. When is it going to be clear again? All the best
  28. 8 points
    A rather pretty edge on spiral in Coma Berenisis. Frost over everything last night, but at least it was clear! 250mm R/C @ F5.35, SX814. 165m Luminance, unguided.
  29. 8 points
    My wife is pretty tolerant of me. I keep 4 scopes in the house, one of which is an assembled 15" truss dob However, there have been a few comments about the amount of kit I have, and it seems like I should compromise a bit. I won't store my 10" in the shed - the mirrors will quickly deteriorate I'd say, and no doubt the structure will accidentally get damaged. I've thought about selling, but just don't like the idea of haggling a price that might leave me feeling empty inside. So I've come around to the idea of just giving it to a good home. I've seen so much with it: it has been the best astro money I've spent. A family near us will get great pleasure from it now I hope, and share in some of the wonder and awe I got from it. It has been collected in time for Christmas morning I've given it with a Telrad, dual speed focusser upgrade, dew shield, TS 31mm plossl, TS 15mm 70° 'super wide', and a TS 9mm plossl to get them started. I can give them a hand to collimate etc, but gonna hold onto my Cheshire It has encoders installed for an Argo Navis unit, but I'm not giving that away either I've given my copy of Turn Left at Orion also - on extended loan, but maybe for good. Goodbye to my trusty SW 250px - it really has been great fun, and you'll hopefully bring joy to more folk now...
  30. 8 points
    Up at 3.00 am to see the waning gibbous Moon still high in the SE. Took the single frame below at 3.26 am, SW 120ED, Ercole Mount, Olympus E-M5 Mk11, 1/800 sec at 400 asa. The sun was setting over the W area o fMare Crisium, and also Cleomedes on the N edge of Crisium. I've attached a crop of this area, and also one to include Janssen and the area N to Wrottesley. Great detail using the binoviewer and 24mm Orthos giving x150. Didn't use more as the seeing was not great as clouds were passing over or close to the Moon. Stayed out until about 4.30 am.
  31. 8 points
    I was out from 5.15 pm to 7.15 pm to observe the Moon with Aristarchus well placed near the terminator, and also to grab a picture of the Moon to keep my run going if possible - 11 days from December 28th to today. I sort of managed it, after a fashion. It was so windy I put my SW 80ED on the Ercole mount in the observatory, it was far to rough to observe using the AZ5 in the open. The seeing was truly awful, I can well believe that the Gulf Stream was overhead, going by at 200 mph according to a weather forecast I heard yesterday. So bad I usually wouldn't have bothered continuing, but I wanted to continue my sequence of pics another night if I could. The cloud was rushing by at an astonishing rate and most of the time it was like this: It was like trying to observe under water, and muddy water at that. I must admit though I do like a challenge, and the best frame I managed was taken at 6.29 pm with the Olympus E-M5 Mk11, 1/500 sec at 400 asa. If you think it's bad - you should have seen the nearly 300 other frames I took and discarded - yes, seriously! The crop is only to show how well Aristarchus was placed, I strongly suggest you don't try to make it any bigger lol. I spent about 40 minutes at the end on visual observing with my binoviewer and Orthos. The Aristarchus complex was superbly placed and I enjoyed the session very much despite the conditions. If the seeing had cooperated of course the views could have been so much better, still - much better than anything else I could have been doing .
  32. 8 points
    First imaging session in 4 weeks! A lovely 1st Quarter Moon. The whole shot using the new Canon 6D full frame camera and the detailed images using the Altair 290M camera. 3000 frames each shot and using the best quality above 60%, roughly 300-400 frames. Both on the LX850 12". I have had the GP290M for about 6 months and it has replaced my Altair 178C for Lunar. The Canon 6D (mod'd) has been added to my collection. I was very surprised how much Moon I could fit in the FOV compared with the 450D
  33. 8 points
    Captured last night from 5.30pm. 13 panes each 3000 captured best 250 stacked. Fullerscope 8.75" on eq6. 290mono and red filter. Native FL. Struggled a bit with high level mist and clouds stopped play before I could get the last two panes! Link to Full res version on Astrobin https://www.astrobin.com/full/kdle57/0/?nc=CraigT82&real=&mod=
  34. 8 points
    My 2019 journey. From my first ever astro photo of Andromeda on the 18th Nov with a self modified Canon 60D, to the Rosette Nebula on the 30th Dec with my ASI294MC Pro. An incredible learning curve and completely different discipline to the sports and nature photography I'd shot before. But I'm hooked and always looking at the weather forecast and planning my next shoot. 2019 Astrophotography Collage by Andy Thilo, on Flickr
  35. 7 points
    I have just collimated the SCT, so really pleased with this! 20 x 360s exposures, 12 darks, 25 flats, 25 bias. Total exposure time: 2 hours. Stacked in Siril, stretched in Nebulosity, star mask subtracted with Starnet++ and final processing with Photoshop. The image has been cropped.
  36. 7 points
    Well, if you can call it that way, but yes, I believe it will be interesting EEVA setup. First introduction to setup. I don't say this often, but this is one sexy looking setup: Scope is SW Mak102mm mounted on AzGTI head and pillar that sits on Berlebach adapter (3/8" to SW mount tripods) and HEQ5 heavy duty tripod. Camera is ASI178mcc (cooled color version) mounted at prime focus. Due to poor weather, this is only daytime testing so no conclusive results (well, some are - ones that will not work ). First baseline shot - sensor mounted at prime focus: Target is roof of a house that is about 315m away (according to google maps / satellite view, and measure tool). Roof is indeed green (dark green - image is not properly color balanced). This image shows full FOV, debayered using super pixel mode for effective resolution of 1548x1040 and scaled down x3 (to 33% size). At full zoom (1:1 pixel) it looks like this: It is rather cold outside and I was shooting from balcony and yes, there were thermals both from my own house and houses in between, but I think this image is pretty much indicative of sharpness so we can take it to be baseline. First test was simple x0.5 GSO focal reducer in 1.25" variety. With this sensor, my aim was to get something like F/4.5. That would be reduction factor of about x0.346, so more than "prescribed" x0.5. I eyeballed distance to sensor so no precise reduction factor (one of things that I wanted to test out was reduction factor at certain spacers combination) and here is full FOV: Pardon the orientation - I was to excited that it worked at all on that distance and that I had no issues with focus so I completely forgot to properly orient the sensor. It is hard to judge sharpness here because depth of field is evident because speed of setup is indeed increased. Here is section of the roof at 1:1: Now this is not smack in the center of FOV and roof is tilted and for that reason I believe that it is depth of field rather than off axis aberrations. Length of tiles in both images are: 165px in prime focus: and 65px with reducer: Ratio of the two is ~x2.54 or as reduction x0.394 - very close to target reduction. With this distance setup is at F/5.12 and additional spacer of 5mm should push it down to F/4.5. Nice. Next thing that I wanted to test out was eyepiece projection and I decided to try out "reducer mode" eyepiece projection method (as opposed to "proper mode"). Unfortunately, achieved reduction is way too large. Eyepiece used was 32mm and sensor was placed at about 27-29mm - that creates somewhere between F/2 and F/1.2 system (probably around F/1.6). This creates all sorts of havoc on optical performance of system (illuminated field is only about half to third of sensor size, and sharpness is well, very non sharp ). Here is full FOV at this setup: I did not debayer this image - just made it appropriate resolution (bin x2 of raw data). That is true mess. Let me see if I can pull out reduction factor and 1:1 image. Actually it's not that bad: Contrast is suffering, but that is because this is very aggressive reduction and this scope is not properly baffled! It really needs to have rather long dew shield to remove issues with baffling. You can see that there is bright outer part of the illuminated circle - that is due to unfocused light going thru front corrector plate and ending up on focal plane (very far off axis for normal use) without hitting mirrors. Anyway, tile length here is about 27px, so reduction factor is about x0.164 and that applied to F/13 system gives F/2.12 (so distance is about 27mm). To be usable configuration, I would need to bring it forward 6mm (to about 21mm) and that is simply impossible with eyepiece projection adapter that I have and this camera model. In the end, there are couple more things to try out for results - proper mode eyepiece projection (with distance to eyepiece of about 43mm - so T2 extension of 16mm will be needed - I can get 15mm, that is 10+5mm) and afocal method with CS lens for this camera (about 12mm lens will be just right). And night time trial as well - that one is probably the most important If everything checks out - we will have very interesting beginner setup that can do it all - visual for planets and DSO and planetary imaging and DSO imaging (in form of EEVA rather than proper imaging, but I also plan to test this scope with a bit more serious sensor - ASI1600 mono + filters - to see what it can deliver if data is processed accordingly).
  37. 7 points
    Not sure if this has been shared before, but a nice little video using data captured by Rosetta. Apologies if already shared.
  38. 7 points
    This refers to astronomers, surely ? I'm definitely NOT worth 60% of my original price, thats for sure
  39. 7 points
    And more with Big Red mounted. Been searching for a mount worthy of Big Red for years. Can’t beleive it’s been nine years since I built Big Red.
  40. 6 points
    Kaboom! Thank you wind storm, few minutes ago neighbors 70 ft ash tree came crashing down. Base has to be 7 ft wide. Beatles killed it nearly 3 years ago, ever since been hoping they'd chop it down. Fell harmlessly towards woods. This opens up entire new swath of space to the South for me. Improves everything, planets, solar, lunar, dso's. So great !
  41. 6 points
    After what seemed like forever,finally got some clear skies last night, but could only get out for a very short time and as luck had it it was clear the whole night.......just a quick shot of the comet,nothing special,just glad to get back in to the obsy.
  42. 6 points
    Providing the quality of the big lens at the front ( called the objective) is ok, you will see Jupiter and its moons with what you've got. Also the rings of Saturn, lots of craters on the moon. Now, to manage expectations, take a dime and hold it at arm's length. That's a bit bigger than the size of Jupiter in the scope, but you can still read the writing. That's the sort of image scale to expect. Saturn is half the size again..... You can detect a lot of galaxies and deep sky objects from a non-light-polluted sky with what you've got. Note the word "detect"....most of them will look like faint fuzzy patches of cotton wool. You have to learn to spot the detail with averted vision and a lot of patience...but half the thrill is in understanding what you're looking at rather than the brilliance of the view. As for cameras, all you can really do with what you've got is take pictures of the moon. There are adapters available to suit most SLR cameras (but Canon is the astronomer's favourite). To take pictures properly you need a telescope that tracks the stars with a driven mount (equatorial mount). The optics need to be a step up on what you've got for general good results. You need to do some reading on this....but a fast apochromatic refractor will be good for wide field shots of deep sky objects. For planets...bigger is better scopewise and you will need a different camera....modified webcams are popular or their better astro cousins. The idea is to take a lot of frames and then select the best. Then add them up so the details comes out better........ If you're going the astgrophotography route then welcome to a difficult, expensive, frustrating and occasionally very rewarding hobby with a phenomenal learning curve.....the standard recommendation is a book "Making Every Photon Count" By Steve Someone whose name escapes me at the moment. Don't rush into buying kit....take some time reading first. It's just not possible in a single reply to go through all the options. And people would need to know more about your likes and circumstances before giving useful advice. Welcome to the forum, RL
  43. 6 points
    Since I've grumbled about Straton, the star-removing software, in the past I must be fair and say that I've finally got some sense out of it. It was an SGL member (I'm sorry but I can't remember who it was) who suggested ignoring the manual and trying it on the stretched image. I did this on a 10 hour Ha stack on Thor's Helmet. Being a tree-skimmer here at Lat 44, the target produced unhappily large stars but Straton removed them very well indeed from the stretched version in a single click. I didn't want to produce a starless Thor's Helmet but simply wanted more smaller stars so I then pasted the original linear data on top of the starless image in Ps, set it to Blend Mode Lighten and stretched till stars appeared in the blend. Some stars needed a little attention but I'm pleased with the way this experiment worked. I could have kept them smaller than this had I wanted to. When adding Ha and OIII to RGB I'll consider using a fully starless version so as to be sure that the NB data has no effect whatever on the final star colour. Olly
  44. 6 points
    Better view than in Blighty
  45. 6 points
    With a few hours of clear sky forecast last night, there was a quick thrash in the workshop to modify the mounting arrangements. The dovetail plate is now bolted directly to the Mesu, and the scopes have been mounted about 2” closer together. Without the adjustment saddle the reference star was nowhere to be seen in the 2nd scope, so this was hastily refitted, @Tomatobro cradling the scope with camera and cables still attached in his arms while I put the adjustable saddle back on, fortunately, no mishaps. A crude camera alignment was conducted and some test subs taken of M42, chosen to put the scopes in an orientation where tube flex/sag was more likely to occur. The 5 x 300 secs images show a number of issues, I’m still getting bleed from the bright stars on the G2-8300 when downloading in SGP (not present in SIPS) and we need to follow Sara’s excellent guide on how to align the cameras properly. On close inspection, the star shapes look similar, indicating there was no significant flex, at least on this test. However, next step will be to fabricate some bracing bars across the top of the tube rings, while still retaining the adjustable saddle. Guided Scope Slave Scope
  46. 6 points
    I have opened the obs for the first time since 9 Dec....!! Despite the bright crescent Moon in the SW I'm having a go at LRGB on IC342 the Hidden Galaxy. I've not imaged this one previously and it sure fills the FOV of my C14 with x0.67 Optec telecompressor. I've got the first 4x5mins R (Bin 2x2) downloaded, so we'll see how it continues. Here's a peak at a quick ArcSinH stretch on a single uncalibrated R sub.... Nice to be imaging something again anyway.....
  47. 6 points
    I got into EAA when I bought my first video camera from Mallincam in 2010 and have enjoyed it ever since. I also have watched this pursuit change over the nearly 10 years now that I have been a part of it. And I have tried to share what we do with others through a number of talks given to local astronomy clubs, outreach events, an article in the March issue of Sky & Telescope, postings and through my website. Around 2014 I began to be curious about the development of video astronomy for deep sky viewing in real time and started researching the topic. Well, after more than 5 years I have finally assembled the information I have been able to collect into an article on my website which I would like to share. I tried my best to be complete and verify information from multiple sources. I will tell you that there is a fair amount of misinformation out there and I tried to make sure that I do not repeat it. I used every resource I could get my hands on to fill in as much of the details of the decades long journey that is analog video astronomy of the deep sky. My summary is based on material I have found in a number of books including Steve Massey's two books on video astronomy, Antony Cooke's book "Visual Astronomy Under Dark Skies", Robert Reeves "Introduction to Webcam Astronomy", along with dozens of articles in Sky and Telescope, Astronomy Magazine, Sky News and more over the past 30 years. It also includes a review of thousands of early posts on the Yahoo Groups: "Video Astronomy", "Quickcam and Unconventional Imaging Astronomy Group",and "Mallincam," along with hundreds of posts on the CN EAA forum and the Stargazers Lounge forum to help me pin down details about each camera along with dates and features. To dig still deeper I also exchanged emails with a number of individuals on the CN forum and others including Rock Mallin, Jack Heurkamp and Jim Ferreira who had first hand knowledge of the early days that I did not. Multiple attempts to reach out to Steve Massey were unsuccessful, hence I could not pin down more details on the GSTAR camera series. To cross check information I also reviewed hundreds of on line web sites and postings by individuals which included camera specifics and pictures. I also bought several vintage cameras to see for myself and to begin to build a collection which spans the history of this hobby and save that history from oblivion. I am still looking for any and all such vintage cameras (Mintron, Watec, Supercircuits, Stellacam, Mallincam, GSTAR, Polaris, ITE, Orion etc.) to add to this collection, but it has reached the point that I cannot justify the expense and am hoping to find individuals who have some of these cameras just collecting dust and are willing to donate these to help preserve history. Maybe one day I can get S&T do publish an article on this history. I hope I have done justice to our little branch of the astronomy hobby. It is necessarily long as it spans nearly 3 decades. I would appreciate feedback where I am missing detailed information and anywhere that I may have not gotten things exactly right. Here is the link: https://www.californiaskys.com/blog Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to all Curtis
  48. 6 points
    Further progress made over the festive season, the circular rack made up of 6 lengths joined together, has been installed using adjustable brackets so that it can be made reasonably level and circular so that the drive motor does not have to be spring loaded. The rack sections were purchased from Poland as a one off on eBay, but I have had a quick look on the net, a lot of powered gate fabricators can supply something very similar, around £22 for a metre length. The motor and drive gear is almost complete, a rotary encoder has been fitted, to enable precise positioning of the dome aperture, this will be needed when two 150mm refractors are in there. Today we connected a temporary power supply and drove the dome around under it’s own power. Today, I took the scope off the mount, to size up the saddle and plates for the dual rig...
  49. 6 points
    Out to catch the Moon again late afternoon. There was a strikingly red and hazy sky after sunset,. It made the sky look rather strange, almost like a painting. Took some pics with the SW80ED and Olympus camera. All pics taken between 4.16 and 4.25 pm. Moon 3.47 days old and 12.1% Illuminated.
  50. 6 points
    This thread brings back some happy memories. As I have thought about my own history, it seems I don't like getting rid of telescopes! C8 - To see Comet Halley and fulfill a childhood dream of having a telescope. 8" Homemade Dob - Fulfilling another childhood dream of grinding a mirror and building a telescope. Still use this one. Sold C8. Sad to see it go, but the 8" Dob has better optics. 20" f/5 Dob - Built by Tectron (USA) and eventually rebuilt by me. Excellent views but ultimately too heavy and required a ladder (which my knees did not like). Fujinon 16x70 binoculars. Viewed Comet Hyakutake through a friend's Fujinons and was hooked. Still use these on a parallelogram mount. Sold 20" Dob to a friend. Very sad to part with it. 14.5" f/4.5 Dob - Built by Teeter's Telescopes (USA). Wonderful telescope customized for me by Rob Teeter; still use this one. Leitz 7x50 binoculars - Inherited these and restored them. This 1945 model has excellent optics; still use these. Just think, if the clouds ever clear, I could use some of these! - Phyllis
  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?
    Sign Up
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.