Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.



Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/12/18 in all areas

  1. 3 points
    This is with another 60 mins of data and processed 100% with APP. Definitely more filament data in the Nebula but too red? I am going to keep adding an hour’s worth of data at each imaging session as long as I can to see how this develops...
  2. 2 points
    Thanks for replies to my previous post (M42/Running Man), really pleased with the ZWO 1600 as it does allow me to a get a decent result from limited imaging time. Even with narrowband I find 120 sec subs are OK using Unity Gain and -20C temperature. Horsehead imaged on 3rd Dec with 20x10sec subs of LRGB using TS65Quad. Crescent imaged in October with 120 sec subs 20xH and 20xO using a TSRC8. Tim
  3. 1 point
    I was actually trying to see the comet, but didnt have any luck, presumably due to the bright sky background. So, I opted for a little smartphone AP instead. These were all with the little TS 72mm f6 refractor on my Ercole mount, so no tracking. They were also handheld because I didn't want to set the smartphone adaptor up. Not too bad considering. Nice to see some clear sky!
  4. 1 point
    I once bought a S/H scope on Ebay and when the package arrived there was a complete dvd box set of all episodes of the Sky at Night (Patrick Moore era) . This was not mentioned by the seller so he must have enclosed them as an after thought ....Dave
  5. 1 point
    Sorry, my mistake. I thought it was a mono camera Steve
  6. 1 point
    In order to succesfully use a multmeter, one needs to have a basic understanding of electricity or electronics. For people with insight in this matter it will be a nobrainer, but for others it will be like voodoo. I think it is always better to ask if you're not sure. This hobby is very time consuming anyway, so don't worry. A multimeter won't bend the fabric of space and time either...
  7. 1 point
    by popular demand I reprocessed this and didn't do any noise reduction. I did make the colors a bit brighter but im curious if this looks better to anybody else without the noise reduction
  8. 1 point
    I would have thought that a filter wheel would fit between the camera and the reducer? I dont see why using spacers instead of the wheel would change that.
  9. 1 point
    Clear skies and plenty of time last night allowed 35 x 4 min subs through a SW ED72 with a canon 1000D. I had time to better frame the image and get a polar alignment on the HEQ5. My previous effort here was completed in a hurry before clouds stopped play! The additional data has certainly made a difference. All shots were taken unguided.
  10. 1 point

    From the album: Next Attempts at DSO's

    On the evening/early morning of the 18th/19th April 2018 I took my first exposures of this galaxy-rich area of the sky. I was experimenting with my CG-5 Go-To mount and Canon 700D modified DSLR with Astronomik 12nm Ha filter and Samyang 135mm lens. Due to constraints on imaging direction I was able to only take a short number of light frames but was interested to see the results of such a wide field imaging session regardless. The image was composed from x14 three minute exposures at f/2, ISO 400 together with x8 dark frames and x50 flat and bias frames. Stacking was carried out using Deep Sky Stacker and the resulting image processed with StarTools.

    © SteveNickolls_2018

  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?

    Sign Up
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.