Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 20/06/12 in all areas

  1. 3 points
    Before anyone reads this, I suppose it's just a few observations of my journey in imaging thus far, nothing more, nothing less. If you don't want to get bored and would rather watch paint dry, then please do - Watching paint dry may be more useful to you I have discovered in 18 months that there are a number of things in imaging that I have severely under estimated. I say severely as I have ignored things at my peril thinking that it 'would do' or 'couldn't affect an image that much'. I wish that I'd paid more attention to these things and not dismissed them as non issues. Perhaps someone will read this and think about what their problems may be and perhaps they have been as guilty as me! 1) Polar Alignment - I have read people ask if polar alignment is THAT important, and I have to say that it is probably the single biggest thing that has blighted my imaging. I used various methods to check PA and thought it was OK - Until I finally got a grip of it and realised how far out it was and how it absolutely stopped me getting round stars. I can not emphasise enough how important this has been in getting round stars and non trailing images. 'That will do' in reality probably won't. 2) Good optics - Recently having got a scope with what is considered to have good optics, and already having a scope that had, I thought, good optics - They are like chalk and cheese. Boy what a difference that made. 3) Getting exposures in hours - I have been so guilty in under estimating how much exposure time you really need. For me now, a couple of hours just won't cut it. I will gladly run into 15 hours plus. It makes a massive difference. I have been as guilty as anyone else of getting 30 mins and thinking that's it - But really push for more and more, it makes a world of difference. 4) Good focuser - Having been 'blessed' with a standard Skywatcher focuser, changing it for a Moonlite and then getting a scope with a decent R&P focuser, I want all scopes to have a decent R&P focuser. They are a joy to use (far more so than the Moonlite even) and really can not be beaten, for accuracy as well as load bearing. I think I've turned into a Crayford disliker, even the premium ones. 5) Guiding and high cloud - You know when we image from night to night and there is NO difference at all in our setup's but on that second night we cannot get a good guiding graph and it's all over the place. I would never have believed what high wispy and almost imperceptible cloud can do. In fact until last week I still didn't believe it, but my proof was there. Guiding goes well on clear nights. 6) Processing skills - Ahh, still learning that one!! I think that when we start out we all under estimate the amunt of time as well as the amount of knowledge required of various processing packages to start getting a half decent result. You captured 10 hours worth of data - Add another 10 hours to that in processing. I'd love to see people putting a processing time by their drop dead gorgeous images, I think we'd all be shocked. 7) Effect on bank balance - How on earth did I get THAT bit so wrong? I started out with £2k for an imaging setup (minus camera) - Woops, I think now I'm slightly over budget!! This hobby is devastating on the pennies. 8) Importance of focusing - I never really got that this can make or break an image. I thought a quick focus would do it, but no. I found that to get good focus I can spend literally 5-10 minutes on it. Never under estimate the difference between alright focus and nailed focus. There's a few more, but I'll not go on. I hope that I don't sound like a complete know-it-all as I'm really not and not half as much of a twit as I probably sound! It's just that these few things have had such a profound effect on my imaging that I thought by writing them down they may strike a chord with someone else. Happy imaging!!!
  2. 3 points
    In the most recent sky at night magazine (july 2012) my 18mp moon mosaic has become picture of the month in the hotshots.... I'm so happy
  3. 3 points
    Earth's axis tilt (and the seasons it causes) are easy to explain. You can do it with a martini and an olive. Put the martini glass in the center - this is the Sun. Now take your olive with the toothpick in it (the toothpick is Earth's axis) and point it straight up. This would model the Earth with no axis tilt. Move the olive around the glass while keeping the toothpick axis straight up all the time. In this no-tilt scenario, our olive-Earth gets exactly 12 hours of daylight and darkness every day without fail, no matter where the olive is in its orbit. Now tilt the toothpick axis about 30 degrees - instead of pointing the toothpick up at 12 o' clock, tilt it to 11 o' clock. Again, move it slowly around the glass -- without every allowing the direction of the toothpick to change. You will easily see that for part of the orbit, the northerly end of olive-Earth's axis is pointing somewhat toward the Sun; this is summer with its long days and short nights. For part of the year, the northerly end of the toothpick axis points away from the Sun, this is northern winter. The point where the axis points most directly at (or away from) the Sun are the solstices. The longest and shortest day of the year respectively. You will also notice that when we have our summer solstice, our mates in Australia (the whole southern hemisphere, actually) are having their summer. This is why seasons are reversed below the equator. You will also note that when the olive's position is 90-degrees away from the solstice point, the toothpick does not point either toward or away from the glass - these are the equinoxes when we have exactly 12 hour days and nights. The last step of our tabletop astronomy experiment is easy. Drink the martini, enjoy the olive, set up your scope for the evening and contemplate the wonders of the Universe from the comfort of the garden! Cheers! (literally!) Dan
  4. 2 points
    Hi folks! We had a transit party at my house earlier this month. We had a Coronado SolarMax, and a 150p dob with solar filter for Venus, and after sunset, we set up the big refractor and took a gander at Saturn. The party was a blast, although I was rather puzzled at the lack of folks from SGL (y'all were invited! ). This wasn't an astrophotography session, when I have friends over for a telescope event, fiddling with cameras is the last thing I want to do. A couple of my friends asked if they could take a snap through the lens with their cell phone cameras. My mate Michael even took photos with his android tablet. Got the photos below in an email today and was absolutely amazed at some of the high quality snaps. Clouds pestered us most of the day, so transit was an on-again, off-again experience and those photos are only so-so. But the real winner if the night was the snap of Saturn through the Apomax at 320x. Keep in mind that this refractor is wonderful, but I didn't take the time to do a full alignment, and the photo was taken by holding a cell phone up to the 5mm EP and snapping away. The photo quality is amazing, with Saturn showing banding and surface features, the shadow of the rings can be seen on the planet's surface, and you can pick up the Cassini Gap quite clearly. I was absolutely floored by the quality of this shot. The moral of the story - don't think you can't do it because you don't have all the expensive kit! Have a go and then show and tell on SGL!!!! Cheers, Dan PS: Proper credit where credit is due.... the photos of Venus through the clouds were taken by Astronomy student Michael Fish (he's the bloke kneeling by the 150p taking photos with the android tablet). The photo of Saturn was taken by Jeremy Woodward, the nice lad with the had standing with me next to the Apomax. The fun photo with the lady looking through the Coronado scope doesn't quite capture the "Ooooo! It's VENUS!!!!" moment, but you get the idea (photo by Woodward). The Apomax, in case you are wondering is a 133mm f/12 refractor with a 4-element oil-filled objective, using an Orion (USA) 5mm Edge-On EP mounted on a Celestron CGE Pro mount. The last photo of Saturn was retouched slightly in Picassa, cropping, adjusting the color, saturation, and such. No sharpening was done, though. DB
  5. 2 points
    Greetings everyone! My name is Vince and I live in the U.S. midwest in Omaha, NE. I retired from the Air Force in 1998 where I worked on most of the avionic systems on RC-135 aircraft. These days I have a much more mundane career as a software programmer for a financial transaction processor. I just purchased my telescope last March. Prior to that my experience with the hobby had been restricted to viewing the discovery channel and image sites like APOD and the Hubble Site. I do bet a lot of people are like me though in that we had the cheap department store telescopes as a kid and always wanted more. In my case it was a small 3 in reflector with a swivel tripod for a mount and very bad plastic eyepieces. I promised myself I would one day get a bigger, better telescope, and it only took me about 45 years to get it (I turn 52 next month). The telescope I have is a Celestron C8-NGT and so far I have only a few token accessories, most of which came with the telescope. I purchased this scope because I wanted a Go-To scope with at least 8 inches of aperture and one that I could try my hand at astrophotography with. Before I really start delving into advanced topics like AP, I've just been spending most of my observing time trying to learn the night sky. My very first night out with my telescope was quite a lesson in how much I needed to learn. When presented with the list of stars to choose for a two star alignment, I was actually lucky to even recognize two. I couldn't add in any calibration stars afterward because I just didn't know what any of the additional ones were. I'm getting better now at recognizing the stars. I am totally dependent on technology though and I bring a laptop with stellarium on it outdoors with me to assist in my viewing. It really does help me. I also learned that I live in a red zone for light pollution and live shockingly close to a white area. I had been struggling to see the full constellations but now I understand why. Only the brightest stars are visible. What a shame. I remember back in 1997 taking my daughter outside to see comet Hale-Bopp and the skies were certainly darker. At times it was easy to see the milky way. Now I live 20 miles farther outside of town and the skies are terrible. I only can see it in pictures these days. I don't have any particularly favorite type of astronomical object to view. If the moon is out I can spend hours on that. During darker conditions, I enjoy hunting the faint fuzzies, and lately I've been viewing some open clusters. Almost every time I've gone out, I just had to take a look at Saturn as I think it's one of the most beautiful objects out there and being a planet, it's nice and bright! I'll be the first to admit that I can ramble on in my posts without really getting to the point, so I better end it now. Look forward to getting to know everyone! Thanks Vince
  6. 2 points
    A bit of tweaking from the original post and linked to the fullsize one astrobin (hopefully). Skymax 150Pro + Celestron E-lux 40mm eyepiece, camera samsung WB700 http://www.astrobin....13269/?mod=none Peter
  7. 2 points
    The last clear night we had here was 16th May. It's been a very long month indeed. After a fair bit of the weather teasing us with offers of clear nights snatched away at the last moment tonight started with enough cloud to make observing tricky, but got better and better as time passed. The Milky Way was clearly visible from the southern horizon to well north of the zenith before it was lost in the lighter northern sky and checking Ursa Minor before I came in, the mag 5.7 star between zeta UMi and eta UMi was definitely visible in direct vision which is fairly good for here. My plan for the evening was to hunt down some of the Messier late teen/early twenties clusters between Sagittarius, Scorpius and Scutum, so I set up the ST120, popped in my 32mm ep and had a quick peek to check focus. Amazingly, bang in the middle of the fov was a stonking great cluster! The only problem now was to find out which one it was. A bit of triangulation from the main constellation stars enabled me to work out that it was M22 and from then on there was no stopping me. In all I found twelve new Messier objects. Some parts of the sky there feel like you're looking into the total perspective vortex, but the two highlights of the night for me were firstly the whole area around M8, M20 and M21 which I had to come back to several times. If you don't look at that and think you need a bigger scope then I think your aperture fever must be cured. Clear nebulosity even in the ST120, low in the sky and with a touch of LP from Taunton thrown in. The second was M17, the Omega Nebula. Another absolute stunner. I know it's almost heretical to say it, but frankly you can keep M45. This part of the sky is absolutely jaw-dropping and I want to go back there with a much, much bigger scope as soon as possible. The only "failure" of the evening was M24. I could find the reddish star that Stellarium shows right next to it, but couldn't make out the M24 cluster at all. I'll try again later in the year if possible, but I think perhaps at the mag 11 claimed for it by Stellarium, it might just be beyond the ST120 except for an exceptional night. James
  8. 2 points
    As my mother-in-law described it when I proudly showed her "Hmmmm, looks like a big white ball. And you have some grubby marks on something in the telescope.c And then my neice "has it got beatles on it?" Those were the sunspots!!! Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk 2
  9. 2 points
    Hale Bopp- the blue ion tail was just fantastic! Hale Bopp on Ektachrome 400, 200mm lens 5 mins exposure.
  10. 2 points
    I'm sick and tired of people coming into my garden to replicate this shot. "Wake up Shane.............wake up Shane.......it's cloudy and raining and you need to get through rush hour....."
  11. 1 point
    Hello This is my first post after I have joined this forum a few weeks ago. I live Austria and I'm trying to make astrophotography since almost 2 years. total exposure 21 hours (84 x 15 min ISO 400) over 4 nights 10" Skywatcher Newton, Skywatcher EQ6 Canon 500D modified, ASA (AstroSystemeAustria) Quattro 2" Coma Corrector Guiding with Lacerta Mgen and ASA OAG Higher Resolution: http://www.distant-l...-2012_04_18.htm More images on my website: http://www.distant-lights.at I hope you enjoy it Thomas
  12. 1 point
    i took 20 subs at 80 sec iso 800 on canon 450 quite a small amount of data but its a start. i cant finish the pics off so i cant take any credit for finished results i have quatermass to thank for his helpwell done mark on a great looking pic
  13. 1 point
    Here's a photo that me and my friend Jonas Grinde took today. I was standing on the ground with the camera and Jonas was piloting the helicopter. It was tricky to get the heli just in front of the Sun, but in the end we managed to get some frames.
  14. 1 point
    Camera looks very shiny, not much I can do this the next two days as I'm teaching all week. I reckon I'll be at least 2-3 days getting used to the camera and working out how to get it properly spaced with the coma corrector. It's just arrived and I've already worked out it'll cost me another £40-60 for the correct spacers and a power supply Anyway, I'll post an unboxing/setup/first light as soon as I can. If I never post again it's either because I can't work the damn thing or the wife has worked out I sold our daughter to pay for it. B
  15. 1 point
    Sorry you lot are having such terrible weather! It's pretty nice here right now... 81 F, sunny, winds at 2 mph and humidity at 28%. Forcast for tonight: completely clear until about 1AM, when the marine layer rolls in, completely shuts down the sky in about 20 minutes and sends all the astronomers to bed. If you want to drive about an hour to the high desert (we are at 500 m alt., Joshua Tree Nat'l forest is at about 1500 m), you can escape the cloud layer entirely. The extra bonus is that the cloud layer traps all the light pollution underneath and makes the high desert skies even darker this time of year. Oh yeah, the forcast also calls for high-magnification views of Saturn with scattered binocular views throughout the garden! Dan
  16. 1 point
    Been thinking about this one for a while now, and, having a clear night decided to make a start....it may never get finished!!! So far - 8 frames (4 across, 2 down) of single 15 min shots just to prove the concept and make some registration frames. Straight from the camera, stretched to maximun with no calibration frames(yet)....
  17. 1 point
    For planetary imaging all you need is a nosepiece and ideally an IR or IR/UV cut filter. Fitting it is really quite straightforward. For DSO imaging you also need to do some electronics which is not complex, but moderately demanding thanks to the small areas for making connections and the fact that you have to completely disassemble the camera and risk breaking it James
  18. 1 point
    Hi Jay, Yes that should work well. I taped my 80mm solar filter over the smaller offset filter on my 200mm newt last night and got some fine views of the sun at 800mm focal length. The 60mm (approx) diameter of the smaller offset aperture was just right. Unfortunately, it turns out that both my Xbox camera and DFK31 were covered in dust so the pictures were a little disappointing. I hadn't noticed before how a 2 or 3 times barlow really shows up the dust with a bright area like the sun, whereas without the barlow they dust spots are alomst invisible. Before I could get chance to sort out the dust issue, the sun went below the houses and since the hard drive on my laptop was full, it was time to call it a day. I am going to make a proper filter for my 200mm newt, cameras have already been cleaned to be ready for the next big sun spots.
  19. 1 point
    Hello Malc, Yeah, I know about the hiking to your favorite observing spot routine. That is what observing buddies are made for!!! Seriously though, if you plan to take your kit out in the dark and hike into your remote observing spot, it would be best to have a friend along, just for safety's sake. Dan
  20. 1 point
    Make sure you store the filter carefully, mine is stored in a Tupperware lunch box and I always inspect it for damage before each use. I think my next scope will be a PST, the sun is amazing to look at through one.
  21. 1 point
    Wikipedia have a handy animated gif here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Earth_tilt_animation.gif James
  22. 1 point
    Naaaa... too much chromatic aberration who took it is obviously a beginner
  23. 1 point
    It's always tilted It doesn't change. The fact that the Earth orbits the Sun does mean that the position of the sun relative to a given point is always changing though. James
  24. 1 point
    In order to be able to catch sunspots, other then the solar filter, you should try to change some settings on the camera, the ISO has to be the lowest possible, and stopped down to the highest number of F Stops. Also, the fastest shot speed would help. Despite your camera is a compact and might be mostly "automatic" or with presets, you should be able to make the image as dark as possible adjusting some settings (refer to the manual). If you still wish to do Afocal with eyepiece projection, the A800 might help to get some crispier images and might give you more options, however, I reckon it won't be much of an improvement. My best advise is that you put your hands on a webcam and use it for planetary.. Your scope has a very narrow field of view so images will appear like "moving away" very fast, but you might still be able to take some quick snapshots and a few seconds videos that, when stacked, will still give some acceptable records of your observations. An x-box 360 live camera can be found for an average of £ 5 and it's perfect for planetary and easy to modify. Or else, if you were able to attach a camera like the A800 or just the one you already own to your scope avoiding eyepieces in the middle, and if you had some soft of tracking, I believe you would be able to take some records of bright DSOs like M42 (Orion), although your scope is F/10 so it's light gathering is low, requiring a tracking mount if you're interested on DSOs at all (and the F/Ratio might also be the reason why you struggled at picking faint stars). My advise would be to save up a little extra money and get a second hand Eq1 mount with stepper motors (you should be able to find them for much less then £ 100!) so that you could try to track for at least 15 / 20 seconds bright objects and take some shots of them with a camera. I have checked the specs of your compact, it has a CCD sensor and it allows to take up to 4 seconds long exposures at ISO1600 (who knows, stacking 10 or 20 frames of bright objects taken at 4" seconds and tweaking a bit with image retouching sofmight produce some interesting results) Now, if you were able to track a bright DSO (or any other star) for 4 seconds at ISO1600, you won't be able to take mesmerizing pictures but you would still make out the object and perhaps its colors for the records. Depending on the shooting mode, your camera will let you select 1/1000 shutter speed and ISO 100 and B/W. Such settings should help to make out sunspots, if any (some days might be frustrating as the sun activity is lower or the sunspots are in the other side of our closest star so you won't still catch anything!). I'm giving you all these suggestions as I started taking pictures of the night sky without even having a telescope, and I loved to push to the extreme the little equipment I had. Also consider getting an Eq-mounted newtonian telescope, a 114mm would be a big improvement from your current scope especially for DSO's and won't cost that much. If you have any particular question or need help feel free to PM me.
  25. 1 point
    This quote from Bob Piekiel will explain quite a bit on the subject. ************************************************************************************************************************************************************* The corrector isn't actually "matched to the scope. Rather, the corrector is made to a pre-determined mathematical calculation and is not always "perfect" when it comes off the assembly line, so the scope is usually "tweaked" to make the system null when the final assembly is done. Celestron does this by hand-figuring the secondary mirror to remove residual aberrations in the system. Meade does it by "parts swapping" (trying different primary/secondary/corrector combinations) until they get a system that nulls. Celestron correctors are all usually a bit different than each other (Meade tries to hold them to a more uniform level) so if you break one any try to replace it with a surplus corrector or one from another scope, it usually makes the scope give very poor images, which would need the secondary mirror re-figured to correct. If you send your scope to the manufacturer, they will replace the corrector and re-match the system, for a hefty fee (usually a few hundred dollars, depending on the size). Even though the optics in both Celestron and Meade are "rotationally matched" the optics themselves are made on automated polishing machines that spin them, so they're figures of revolution and theoretically should be free of astigmatism. Indeed, astigmatism is very hard to match out, compared to other types of aberration (spherical, etc). Therefore if you have a scope with a mis-rotated corrector, you can try star-testing it and rotating it in 90-degree increments, seeing which position gives the best images. Fine-tune as you go, but collimation and centering is going to be more important than rotational orientation. Correctors with simple radial cracks usually pose no degradation to performance at all, and can be simply left alone. The questions you are asking are big ones, and it is difficult to explain the answers in a couple paragraphs. All of this info can be found in detail in my two books "Celestron The Early Years" (ebook) and "Testing and Evaluating The Optics of Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescopes." They both contain highly detailed descriptions of how the optics are made, figured, and why they work the way they do. They contain detailed interviews with Celestron opticians and matchers, as well as inside tips and info found nowhere else. My SCT testing book has chapters describing secondary matching procedures for the more ambitious ATM. Together, they will make you an "expert" on the topics of your questions. I've regularly talked about both books here many times. I advertise them on Astromart, and have an ad running there now under the "Catadioptric" section. Best, Bob Piekiel ************************************************************************************************************************************************************* Well worth getting his books as well. John
  26. 1 point
    I would also vote for a correct image finder, plus red-dot finder. In my opinion the best correct image finder is made by Baader. I see that Telrads have been recommended here as the best red dot finder, and I believe it is. But I often use the Rigel Quickfinder as it's smaller and lighter. If I have a good correct image finder, I don't always feel I need the best red-dot finder as well.
  27. 1 point
    I have found Qualia's excellent post to be most informative and I'm sure that the the OP will to. I find myself in a similar situation of being able to identify the main constellations from my light polluted back garden using an atlas and the naked eye stars (down to mag 3) but become hopelessly lost as soon as I look through the 9x50 finder to see a huge number of stars! I have turn left at Orion but I still find the view confusing. If like me you are new to this then maybe we will improve with time? BTW I have found using a laser helped me to find a couple of dso on my last observing session. There is a thread about finders in here which has some good advice on a number of different finder options. I'm currently waiting for the Telrad to turn up from flo ( will it ever!) and will post my findings ( excuse the pun) when I get it and some clear sky's. Ikorodu
  28. 1 point
    HI there Matt, good to see more and more people catching on to Cliff's amazing mod. If you haven't already done the led's could I just say - be very careful doing them. I hope this will be helpful generally for people unsure about the led's - a few have broken their cameras this way If your mod is going to go wrong - popping the led's will be what does it. It may sound like a bit of hassle but if you can find something like a mini-extra thin hand tool drill, like (some) girls use to put extremely small holes in their fingernails (i didn't want to know why didn't ask Nail jewelery?.) anyway, they look like a v small electrical screwdriver but with a micro thin drill-bit for a tip, even a tiny cross head screwdriver that you can gently, slowly twisting, bore a little hole in each led, just far enough to slightly perforate the glass, checking after every turn - by plugging it into your laptop, with software running - until it fails to light up before moving onto the next one, all the time carefully avoiding slipping with the tool and especially avoid getting any dust or grease or particles on the chip - after taking off the lens to remove ir filter replace the screw-in original lens asap to cover it from contamination. I apologise for lengthy post but i'm hoping this will also be of use to other newbies, like me, when doing their mods. All the best, Jay Ps. to get the casing off try inserting the round end of a thin teaspoon in the gap and twist - should click open with little damage. HTH.
  29. 1 point
    Xplode's is a useful post but with a high power EP you can close in on particular sunspot groups as seen in those images and resolve astounding detail. As ever, push the magnification till it is too much and then back off. Olly
  30. 1 point
    Hi Carl Using a regular straight through finder successfully does require a bit of practice and patience I'm afraid. Telrads and RDF,s can help a great deal as has been said. I think the long and short of it is, either, keep at it you'll get there eventually, or go for a Telrad or RDF. The third alternative is to change the straight through finder for a RACI (right angled correct image) one. This will show you exactly the same star patterns as you see in your atlas and does really help locate faint objects. I use both a Telrad and a RACI finder on my Dob and would be a bit reluctant to go back to a straight through one now. I see you are in Surrey feel free to drop in on the "SGL Surrey Observers" section of the forum. We arrange group observing sessions regularly (in fact most clear nights) near Dorking, and trips to some dark skies whithin reasonable distance on and around the new moon (if we ever get any clear nights again).
  31. 1 point
    Is your finder aligned with your scope? Star hopping can be a tricky business to get used to though, which is one reason alternative finders exist such as Telrads and Rigels, especially but not exclusively for dobs. I know it doesn't help you much, but you can find some telrad charts on the web, for example here: http://www.astro-tom.com/messier/messier_finder_charts/messier_maps.htm.
  32. 1 point
    The Baader solar film is perfectly safe to use. You just have to make sure there are no holes,tears,rips in it. You also need to make sure that it fits the front of your scope very very snuggly, so that there is no chance of it falling off or blowing off. The filter itself once installed on the front end of the scope blocks 99.999% of the light,heat and UV rays that the Sun givesa off. Its pretty amazing to observe our nearest star so closely (with the filter).
  33. 1 point
    Having said that, many, many people observe the sun, and with care, its really quite safe. Remember to cover up your finder scope, as it can burn you or if you accidentally catch a glance through it, worse. But use the scope shadow to line up, make sure the filter is sound and secure, and all should be fine.
  34. 1 point
    With a regular filter you won't see much details, the only thing i can see with the filter on my astronomy clubs WO Megrez 80II with a filter is sun spots. Here's a pic with the max amount of detail you can get thru regular filters: On your telescope i'd say 25-33mm a eyepiece would give good details and clear picture.
  35. 1 point
    Hi Sally. You should check out the Solar Observing/Imaging section of the website. It will show you what to expect with a "white light" filter such as the one you have. You will see sunspots. I'm not sure what magnificcation you would need to be using but i think a 10-15mm EP should do., http://stargazerslounge.com/forum/30-observing-lunarsolar/
  36. 1 point
    Hi If you are still after a setting circle let me know. I drew a full anticlockwise protrator, graduated every degree and labled every 5 degrees, for my shywatcher 8" dob - the first one the text wasn't bold enough so I jigged about with it. I produced it in Autocad but I can convert it to a pdf next time I am in the office - probably Friday. I have applied sticky back plastic front and back and have cut out the centre to sit on the stand. (There are guide lines for cutting out the centre). I propose to use a heavy portable pointer sat on the ground that I will set to the azimuth of polaris when sighted. I dont know if it will be any good but I have just got a cycle rear light for illuminating it. I have also scaled it up for my revelation 12" but done nothing with it yet. Rich
  37. 1 point
    If I had a pier I would like a yacht moored up along side.
  38. 1 point
    very informative link about using dishes as antenna's gives meaning and explains how they work http://www.radio-electronics.com/info/antennas/parabolic/parabolic_reflector.php
  39. 1 point
    Not really. We are seeing them as they were 13 billion years ago. At that point in time they could not see us (even if our galaxy had formed), because light from our galaxy had not reached them (assuming the same distance, which is also wrong). At this point in time, they should be able to see our galaxy where it was 13 billion years ago. Actually, you need to think of this in terms of space-time, and then our brains, never designed to deal with relativity, start to hurt
  40. 1 point
    Thanks for everyones advice, it looks like you were all getting at the same thing (the starting position) but this seems to be missed off in the instruction booklet. Looking forward to tonight now I did manage to get a look at Saturn last night and it looked amazing. The scope seems pretty good quality for the price (127 Sky-Watcher Skymax although the mount will need to be updated at some point I think)
  41. 1 point
    You should be taking RAW CR2 files with your Canon then stacking them in Deep Sky Stacker. I use Back Yard EOS for controlling the camera and taking images.
  42. 1 point
    A few regions of sunspots remain visible in whitelight. Remarkably, the active regions visible in CaK appear to be quite strong and coincide with several of the filaments in H-alpha on regions that appear devoid of activity in the white light view. On this day I tried to do a comparison between the WO110 and Baader Hershel Wedge with the same wedge on a Revelation 80mm. The detail remains very sharp on the sunspot regions although a larger portion of the disk of the sun is visible through the smaller aperture. The Revelation has always been a favourite Go-To travel scope for dark skies and lunar eclipses, nice to see the same quality apparent in the solar area as well. Thank you for looking. Sheri
  43. 1 point
    When I had a 120 ED I used it on a HEQ5. Worked ok but I would have preferred an EQ6.
  44. 1 point
    We had wonderful weather yesterday but the Sun was constantly behind thin cloud and it was certainly a challenge to image but at least I managed a full disc. It made me happy anyway after the disappointment of Wednesday morning Composite of 9 images taken with a Solarscope SF-100 / DMK41, processed in Autostakkert2, then sharpened and put together in Photoshop CS5. 2012 06 10 Full disc false colour by Alexandra's Astronomy, on Flickr For full size which is definitely worth it: http://www.flickr.co...in/photostream/ Thanks for viewing. Regards Alexandra
  45. 1 point
    Hello and welcome to the forum. I think I may have found the holdup. Nigel
  46. 1 point
  47. 1 point
    Thanks, the Mrs wanted something that looked nice so I'll be building a sundial to go on top when I'm not using it.
  48. 1 point
    Star-Party Las Majadas 2012, Natural Park Serranía de Cuenca June 15-17, 2012 Hi, As every year I'm organizing a Star-Party in central Spain, 30km Northern the city of Cuenca, something in the middle between Madrid and Valencia. The star-party is held in a Camping placed in a Natural Park, in a mountainous area with elevations about 1500m. Besides of the astronomical obverving we will have daytime activities for all the family. We put special attention for the children. They will have a special observing sesion conducted by a teenager on a 12" dobsonian. Along the weekend will be some astronomy workshops for the children. The attendance is free, you need just to cover your own expenses. However to organize the activities would be great to be registered. We expect about 100 amateurs. Besides we usually share the telescopes, Meade Instruments Europe offers four big telescopes for the use of the attending people. All the best Patricio More information in my website (in Spanish) http://www.astrosurf.com/patricio/lasmajadas2012.htm Don't hesitate to ask me any question at patricio (at) geo.ucm.es Rock formations in one of the trips we will do. Observation area inside the camping (elevation 1500m) Luminic pollution map. Haircross for the camping. Madrid at the left, Valencia at the right.
  49. 1 point
    Well, lucky old you [teasing]. <G> Somehow, I sense the second hand value of the poor old Hyperion has just plummeted - As result of this very thread. Always the same, when I contemplate selling GOOD stuff on... In fairness, Baader Hyperions were one of the FIRST eyepieces that secured an "Honourable discharge" in the face of the vocal and defensive (rather rich?) "Naglers-only", Cloudy Nights reviewers! It may be that eyepiece technology has come on, apace since? In part, I sense it has, but... I think the potential issues re. Hyperions relate to long eye relief. The large eye lens (combined with a small exit pupil) can make viewing "difficult"? I often "lose" the field of view, in that large expanse of glass! I do prefer the "eye cup methodology" of TS/HR "Planetaries", at HIGHER powers. But Hyperions inferior to a "Cheap Plossl"? Well Maybe... But I'd be a bit surprised.
  50. 1 point
    Firstly, Welcome to Stargazers Lounge - the liveliest place in the Internet to discuss all aspects of astronomy, share pictures and observing reports, and find out what there is to see in the night sky. To ensure the Forum operates as smoothly as possible, we ask that you read and adhere to our Code of Conduct: Stargazers Lounge – Members Code of Conduct Before we start …. Use of our forums constitutes acceptance and agreement to our Forum Code of Conduct. If you do not agree to these terms, please contact a member of the Administration Team to have your account disabled. If you violate the Code of Conduct, we reserve the right to terminate all accounts belonging to you without prior notice. We prefer to advise users of inappropriate behaviour; however, flagrant and repeated violations of our CoC will result in a ban. Our failure to enforce this policy, for whatever reason, shall not be taken as a waiver of our right to do so at any time. The term “Stargazers Lounge” covers the forum and its Administrators, and any communities or other hosted content related to “SGL” The term “Administration Team” is applied to all of the Moderators, Global Moderators or Administrators for the purposes of these guidelines Principle Guidelines 28 December 2008, 23:43:22 We created the Code of Conduct to provide a basic understanding of what's allowed and not allowed in our forums. The following are the principle guidelines for the establishment and enforcement of our CoC: • Ensure a friendly atmosphere to our visitors and forum members • Ensure the privacy of our members and that of others • Comply with existing laws • Encourage responsible use of our forums and discourage activities which disrupt our community or hobby and reduce the value of our services to our visitors • Encourage the freedom of expression and exchange of information in a mature and responsible manner The “not allowed” list is pretty short, but it should be remembered that what can seem to be light-hearted comments and fun to one person, can be offensive to another. This is especially true in politics and religion. Therefore: • No politics • No religion Don’t we believe in free-speech? While we are committed to the principles of free speech, certain activities may be damaging to the resources or reputation of Stargazers Lounge and cannot be permitted under the guise of free speech. The resources of Stargazers Lounge are limited, and abuse of these resources by one user has a negative impact on the entire community. As a member of our forum, you must participate responsibly. If you have any questions regarding our CoC, please contact the Administration Team via email on “contact at stargazerslounge dot com” (replace the ‘at’ and ‘dot’ as appropriate) Violations of the Code of Conduct It is extremely important for you to understand that this section of our Code of Conduct isn’t designed to cover every eventuality! We may take action — issue a warning, ban your account(s) and/or IP addresses, lower your post count, delete/edit your post(s)/thread(s), etc. — if your conduct at Stargazers Lounge is counterproductive to the Code of Conduct’s principle guidelines. Unauthorised access / Forum Security The following actions are strictly prohibited: • Accessing, or attempting to access, the accounts of other users • Exploiting, or attempting to exploit, bugs, vulnerabilities, or loopholes; whether they are disclosed or undisclosed • Penetrating, or attempting to penetrate, security measures of Stargazers Lounge's software or hardware, or electronic communications system All intrusions will subject all your forum accounts to immediate termination, regardless of whether or not the intrusion results in the corruption, loss, or theft of data. Users are responsible for the security of their Stargazers Lounge accounts. Users may not share their passwords or transfer – via any means – their accounts to others without the express permission of the Stargazers Lounge Forum Management Team. In addition, users are responsible for all activity made by him/her or anyone the user allows to use his/her account. Usernames Usernames must not be in violation of this Code of Conduct. We reserve the right to terminate accounts whose associated usernames are in violation of this Code of Conduct, or are otherwise deemed inappropriate and/or potentially offensive. Users may be invited to register under a new name at our discretion. Personal Attacks, Harassment and other abuse Comments or personal attacks towards anyone - staff, forum member, or a visitor who is likely to view it on the forums - is subject to the message being deleted and action taken against the user, regardless of how pertinent or thoughtful the rest of the message might be. This also includes comments/links/materials that refer to ethnic/national origin, ideological/religious beliefs, gender,sexist, or sexual preference in a demeaning context. We have no tolerance for discrimination. You are in violation of this rule if the nature of your post discriminates, promotes hate, promotes violence or advocates hatred or discrimination against individuals, groups, races, cultures or organisations because of their ethnic/national origin, skin colour, sexual orientation or culture. Words that carry different meanings in different countries and cultures will be examined at the discretion of the Administration Team and the appropriate action taken. This includes "potentially" libellous comments against companies and other organisations. Libel Stargazerslounge try to monitor and review all posts, discussions, chats, postings, transmissions, bulletin boards and other dialogue ("Dialogue") on its Sites, Stargazerslounge is under no obligation to do so and assumes no responsibility or liability arising from the Dialogue contained in its Sites, or for any error, defamation, libel, slander, omission, falsehood, obscenity, pornography, profanity, danger or inaccuracy contained in any information within its Sites. Stargazerslounge does not monitor or review the content of any off-Site pages or any other sites linked to its Sites and assumes no responsibility or liability arising from the contents of such off-Site pages or sites, or for any error, defamation, libel, slander, omission, falsehood, obscenity, pornography, profanity, danger or inaccuracy contained in any information contained therein. Spamming No spamming! Spam includes, but is not limited to, the following: • Excessive off-topic threads • Posting nonsensical messages • “Flooding” the forum with similar meaning messages • Post-Count farming (see definition below) • Posting just to gain access to the for sale section • Inciting a forum war or riot • Blatant advertising • Messages without content • Fraudulent activity (Pyramid schemes, chain letters, etc.) • Free-____ links (i.e. free iPods, Free PSP, etc. etc.) • Asking our members to complete external questionnaires or similar market research exercises Post Farming If we see an individual posting a large number of short non-specific posts, all in the same day, we will suspect them of post farming to increase their post count and gain early access to the For Sale board. Particularly if we see posts like “Thanks”, “Great image", ’Thank-you for sharing” and similar. Post farming is obvious and harms your credibility so please slow down, take your time and be patient. Post to add value, post to learn, post with thought, consideration and humour.Advertising We want to avoid spam generated by promotion teams, public-relations campaigns or any other traffic-hungry webmasters. So please note that our forums aren’t the place to advertise your own site or forums or sites with similar content to ours. Stargazers Lounge staff don’t visit your site and spam it with adverts, so we expect the same courtesy in return. You are welcome to link your personal (non-commercial) site in your signature. Retailers or manufacturers are not permitted to post / promote their company or products in any way without the express approval of the Admin team. Any forum member who seems to have created their account solely to promote another site will be permanently banned. The Buy & Sell section Access to SGL's buy and sell section is a privilege that has to be earned, You can do this by accumulating 50 posts to view / buy from the classifieds and 250 posts to place an advert in the classifieds. This has been initiated so that people can't just join the forum so they can off load or buy up astronomy equipment. Posting an advert on behalf of someone who is not a member of SGL or on behalf of a member not entitled to post an advert is not permitted. Linking to an external site to highlight an item you have for sale is not permitted on our boards. Please note that the Buy & Sell section is primarily for our members personal "astronomical" equipment. Any commercial use of this section will have to be cleared by Admin PRIOR to any sales activity. Pirated Materials, Cracks, Keys, and Key-Generators Stargazers Lounge relies heavily on software to accomplish certain tasks – star maps, observing reports, imaging and so on. This software is often created by individuals (and released by them under a licence) who should expect the terms of their licence to be adhered to, including receiving fair payment for their work if they so choose.. For the purposes of Stargazers Lounge, the following definitions apply: • “Piracy” is the illegal copying and/or distribution of copyrighted content including, but not limited to, games, software, music, movies, pictures, ROMs, abandon-ware, and leaked software • “Cracks” are programs that disable copy-protection technology • A “Key” is a combination of numbers and letters that is required for software installation • “Key-Generators” are programs that generate valid Keys You may not encourage, post in support of, link to, or discuss activities, methods, and/or techniques involving piracy, cracks, keys and key-generators. In addition, the following are grounds for moderator action on your post and/or account: • Seeking help to create any of the above • Admitting to possess pirated materials, cracks, keys and key-generators • Admitting to distribute pirated materials, cracks, keys and key-generators • Uploading any such files to Stargazers Lounge sites Generally breaking this rule will result in an instant permanent ban. However a “first-offence” warning may be issued at the discretion of the Administration Team. Forgery or impersonation Attempting to impersonate any person, including staff, using forged headers, instant messenger names, similar usernames (i.e. “GiIIB”, “Gi11B”, “Angel GillB”) in an effort to deceive or mislead is prohibited. Profanities You may not use profanity or bypass the software-based censor. In addition to words included in the censor list, sexual remarks and slang may be considered profane when used in certain contexts. The list below shows examples of what bypassing the censor means. The word used in the example is “Pencil”. The list is not exhaustive; it merely demonstrates what can be considered as actively bypassing the censor • P***** • P3ncil, Penc1l, P.e.n.c.i.l • P e n c I l • Pencil • WTF • FFS ****/Sexually Offensive Materials/Other Offensive Materials You may not post or link to pornography or sexually offensive materials. If you are unsure whether what you wish to post may be in violation of this rule, please consult a moderator first before posting. Illegal Use You may not use our forums for illegal purposes, in support of illegal activities, or encourage conduct that would constitute a criminal offence, as determined by the laws of the United Kingdom. Such activities will guarantee a ban. We reserve the right to cooperate with legal authorities and/or injured third parties in the investigation of any suspected crime or civil wrongdoing. Non-Disclosure Agreements We will delete posts containing materials in breach of active Non-Disclosure Agreements, if we are so notified that a breach has occurred. We will also work with the relevant authorities if requested to do. This may mean disclosure of your account details. Privacy / Copyright You may not • Post any form of personal information of a user unless the user has first permitted it by express consent. Examples of personal information include name, address, IP addresses, and phone numbers. • Distribute any form of personal information, email address, private/email Messages with intent to harass or in any demeaning manner as determined by a moderator, regardless of consent. • Disclose a user's unpublicised email address unless the user has first permitted it, either by actual consent or previously releasing said information. • Post any form of personal information if you are 13 or under. • Post copyrighted material unless consent from the originator has been approved (evidence of such approval must be presented when asked for) SGL will not • Disclose your personal information to anyone, member or otherwise, unless working in co-operation with authorities as detailed elsewhere in these guidelines Official Language English is the official language of our forums because it is the common language between our moderators and users. Because we can not moderate post/thread text in a foreign language, you may not post or have a signature in the forums in language other than English. Email Addresses • You may not harvest email addresses from our forums for any purpose • You are required to keep your forum account's email address up-to-date. If a message sent to the email address on record bounces, your account will be banned and you will have to contact a member of the Administration Team to have your account unbanned Moderation & Bans • You may not evade a ban. Doing so will drastically lengthen your ban. If you believe your actions were not in violation of this Code of Conduct, you can appeal by contacting a member of the Management Team • You may not publicly complain about or demand a reason for another user's ban, the deletion of a message, or the deletion/closure of a thread. Any discussion about warnings, bans, message deletion, thread deletion and thread closure should be done over private email between the person concerned and the moderators • You may not re-post or re-edit a message that has been edited by a moderator • You may not post a message on behalf of a banned forum member • Do not include phrases such as “I will probably get banned for this...” as this will ensure your wish is granted!! Cookies Like most sites SGL uses cookies. In order to deliver a personalized service, we remember and store information about how you use it. This is done using a simple text file called COOKIES which sit on your device. these cookies are completely safe and secure and will never contain any sensitive information. They are only used by stargazerslounge.com. By using SGL or closing this notice you accept our policy. The SGL policy on cookies can be found >>HERE<< Miscellaneous • Do not post negative posts and discussions that are repeated over and over and over with no other purpose than to disrupt conversation. If you feel the need to say something, say it once and then move on. Do not disrupt multiple threads in order to get your view out. • Do not start malicious or unsubstantiated rumors, this could lead to a libel action being taken against you + it goes against everything SGL stands for. • You may not bait/troll users. Bait / Trolling are defined as posting with a clear intent to provoke anger, incendiary posts, and behaviour that results in other users violating the CoC. • You may not post asking for help with fundraising or charitable donations. We have thousands of members, the forum would be inundated with requests. • Do not post links to inappropriate material. This is not limited to but includes bad language or images of an adult nature. • You may not bait, insult, flame, or otherwise abuse a staff member. Staff members have to follow the same rules, and should you have a problem with a certain staff member, please contact a moderator or the Administration Team. • You may not post graphically-disturbing images as inline images (such that the images are displayed when users view your post). However, you can link to the images with a warning stating that the images are graphically disturbing • You may not post in a manner that is harmful to Stargazers Lounge. For example, “SGL sucks. Go here!” If you do, the post will be deleted and you will be banned. • You may not register multiple accounts with intent to violate any part of this CoC. • You may not link to the forum logout page, disguised or not. • In the event of a ban, your posts will not be deleted, even if you request them to be. Doing so would disrupt the flow of the threads in which you have posted and could therefore make them unintelligible. By signing up to SGL, you agree that your posts are stored on SGL’s servers and therefore become part of the SGL forum • Remember to make use of the ‘smilies’ in posts – it can be very difficult to ascertain the tone of a post without them! • Duplicate Posts, where appropriate the moderator team may merge closely related topics. But this is at the discretion of the mod team and will only be done where we feel it appropriate.
  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?
    Sign Up
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.