Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.


All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. Hi, I can only comment visual, but it is a good scope for the price. I tested two samples and both where very good collimated. The focuser is also sturdy enough for heavier eyepieces. Color is visible at higher magnifications (120x and above) using an artificial star but ok for the short focal length. I am still considering the scope for grab and go also. cs, Uli
  3. 5 years old ? That's cradle snatching. ....... Old is Thinkpad X41 12" Netbook, plus dock left in warm room ready to go. Lightweight magnesium frame, cost thousands when new. Runs guiding and imaging fine but way too slow for image processing, so slip the memory card out of the slot and indoors to the Desktop PC. Good to hear things are happdning at last.
  4. PeterCPC

    Hello from Sussex!

    Hello and welcome. Peter
  5. Hi, yes, I was very lucky to have the chance testing and comparing both scopes. Both are very fine instruments. cs, Uli
  6. Short shift session , set up at 10 and away about midnight as the sky grew ever brighter with the moon. I'm not a great fan of eq mounted Newts, so I set up just to view north and east . This also enabled handy ep height at the zenith . The OO has a single secondary vane , it gives fairly clean diffraction rings. I cut a cardboard aperture mask , this covered the focus tube and whole secondary vane. This gave some razor sharp views, starting with Alkalurops. The companion split obviously even at lower power . "La Superba" gave stunning colour , really worth finding (Y CNv), much improved with aperture reduction. Went through to some views in Hercules , Marsic, Eltanin,Sarin and Rasalgethi. Lifting up the aperture cardboard, over to NGC 6229, a lovely bright core on this globular cluster. A very fine view of Bode's. Some views of Canes Venatici area, NGC 4490 ("cocoon"),.NGC 4449,NGC 5005,even the streak of NGC 4631 ("whale "), M106 and M94 . Great to be out temperature about 15 degrees and sqm 19.14 mag. Clear skies ! Nick.
  7. Thanks all for the advice, some food for thought, I'll give FLO a call and see what 8" dob I can get for my budget
  8. It would help if you told us what mount you are using. Peter
  9. Hi all, Absolute newby here - my first foray into astronomy. I bought a Saxon 1400mm 6" refractor secondhand complete with a EQ mount for a bargain price and I'm keen to get it working properly for both planetary and deep space observations. I invested in a few extras such as a laser collimator and a 3x barlow. I think I have a handle on how it all works including the EQ mount. I took the scope out for a test over Easter - which just happened to coincide with a ISS transit of the full moon. Rippa, I thought, that would be great to capture on my first night of observations. The problem I have is the complete inability to focus the scope to anything like sharp enough. I have some photos I took with the scope attached: The scene with the normal camera lens for my daylight practice session A shot of a distant house with the telescope (using a Nikon D7000 on a t-mount adaptor) The same house with the barlow attached A shot of the moon- no barlow - as sharp as I could get it - certainly no way to see the silhouette of the ISS with the scope this out of focus When I was collumating the scope, I noticed a that the reflection on the primary mirror was not a single spot but rather a line ... which means that the laser on the collimator target is a line rather than a dot I confirmed that this is not a problem with the shape of the laser beam coming from the collimator by showing the shape on my hand at a distance of 14m I'm not sure if the distortion of the laser is the fault of the secondary mirror or the lens(es) in the bottom of the eyepiece mount. I'm also not sure if this distortion is what is causing the inability to focus the scope, but I suspect that both issues are symptoms of the same problem. I'd appreciate any ideas on what to do next to resolve the focus issue.
  10. Good to hear! Only problem I have is trying out AP in the future. The only tracking mount I have currently is a Nexstar 4/5se alt az mount which I worry would strain the motors under the unbalanced load of the scope and dslr attached. Will short exposures of say 15 seconds cause star trails and field rotation to be apparent(assuming the mount tracks correctly)?
  11. Don't hesitate so much to stand up for your rights! The guy sold you a mount with a flaw! It is your right to get a new one or be reimbursed. You do not need to show him all kinds of pictures to make your case
  12. Today
  13. Can I download these number of photo's, Ciaran?
  14. Glad its working Not sure about the resolution, never changed mine from default. There is something about font size in Configuration / Tools. One is for the Screen and the other the Graphics so not sure what affect changing this will have? Steve
  15. I'm new to astronomy, but i kid you not, i was viewing the moon this morning (Mon, 22/04/19 around 5am BST, Liverpool, UK) at 500x mag with my 130mm/900mm Newtonian and although there was a bit of image wobble, i could see really well! I'm expecting almost everyone to laugh at me or call me a liar but i swear it's true! I put a 3.6mm plossl on the 2x Barlow, effectively making the plossl a 1.8mm, just to see how bad the image would be, but was shocked when i actually managed to get a sharp focus ?? It's opened my eyes, literally, to what's possible when seeing, optics and collimation etc all come together perfectly! I'm assuming it would never happen with anything else as the Moon is very unique in that it's relatively huge, very very bright, and obvs silly close to earth, in astronomical terms.
  16. For deep sky observations, can you make suggestion which will be more fitted with my behavior: mobility is not a big concern as a least 11" aperture is must whereupon computerized stuff is no good choice for me.
  17. Nice work Steve. What kind of Altitude was Jove at at this early hour of the morning?
  18. Help me understand how this equatorial mount CGE pro own a price tag of 5000 usd? As a beginner; will it be a smart choice for me?
  19. I am using a SW 50ED finder guider, and a ASI Zwo 290mini with 2.9um pixels. Alan
  20. The re-do is much better, nice photo!
  21. What camera and guide scope are you using? https://openphdguiding.org/manual/?section=Trouble_shooting.htm
  22. The PHD2 Manual has a great Problem solving section. https://openphdguiding.org/manual/?section=Trouble_shooting.htm Just make sure the scope is well balanced and all the attachments/ holding screws are tight and PA is as good as you can get. Performance will vary with the conditions.
  23. Finally after so many failures I had success and it would appear that yet another new cable by Lynx of all people was the fault, at least that's what I think. Can anyone help with what I do to fine tune the guide, it run RMS in Dec and RA of between 0.35 and 0.4 most of the time, it get down to 0.28 at times and most of the time was close to the graph centre but did one or two times go slightly above and below yhe 2"markings. I was running 1.5 seconds on the exposure but didn't want to play too much for fear of messing it up. And yes I will try EQmod but I will run a few subs with this for the moment just to cheer me up, 2 and 3 minute subs looked clean with round stars, apart from when I kicked to mount. Thank for any pointers Alan
  24. I don't see any point in moving from the observatory but yet again after success last night it looks like a brand new Lynx cable does not work, the one that fellow Mod Rob sent me seems to have bigger clips on it and fit much tighter. Alan
  25. They are not that old 5 years I think but I know what you mean. My Dell has a serial connector but I have a cable for Direct EQmod from Lynx which I will get working . I like the Easy word being used , I was told ST4 was easy, though it did work last night fairly well but I am doing to start a new thread to ask about fine tuning it, it was a bit up and down with an RMS in Dec and RA of around 0.35-0.4 most of the time, it did get down to 2.8 at best. I didn't stay out long because I was tird but got some decent subs at 2 and 3 minutes as I was just trying it out.
  1. Load more activity
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.