Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.


All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. Nope, I leave it all to Pixinsight to sort out. So you mean rotate the lights before calibration?
  3. Do you manually rotate your lights prior to stacking?
  4. Just wondering why you think a 5 inch reflector is "measly", lots of people on here don't use anything bigger, they provide a fabulous middle ground between seeing and usability. Generally speaking in UK skies a 10 inch is roundabout the point where atmospheric seeing begins to limit the true potential of a system and then you begin to get diminishing returns as the aperture increases (yes bigger is better but the opportunity to use it to its potential decreases and the setup time becomes such that real planning is required for sessions). You can find massive systems for sale second hand all the time, often bought by people who considerably misunderestimated the amount of time and effort and money involved in setup and ownership.
  5. But of course if the tripod has a pan/tilt head - often the case if already being used for photography, that will also do the job. Like the one to which I posted a link earlier in this thread. Personally, and particularly if using an accurate polar scope, I would prefer a head which has fine adjustments in both Alt and Az. There is a Manfrotto unit. but it's expensive, as are most look alikes. It's possible to buy separately the geared wedge for the Star Adventurer. Strong and stable. Peter
  6. I am really baffled folks and could use your help. I thought flats taken either side of the peer would work fine. They normally do... There is absolutely NO rotation of the camera taken place (TEC140 with Atik 460). Flats taken at same CCD temperature, same focus position. I tried different ADU for the flats and no difference. Retaken lots of different flats and still same result. This three hour data set in luminance is lost if I can't figure this out A sub (east side) of the peer before the flip and my flats calibrate out dust donuts. As it happens, flats ALSO taken East side of peer (facing my wall mounted flats panel). But the subs AFTER the flip (with the same master flat as before the flip) and the flats are leaving strange residual donuts that are not calibrating out. Vignetting removed but weird artefacts of the dust donuts are left. To repeat no rotation of the camera has taken place at all. Leaving me with a messed up result with 16 x 10 Minute subs.
  7. I've never had a reply from Skywatcher - but they dont really "exist" do they? I suppose skywatcher as an entity is mostly just "put shiny black and green on that scope over there", its all just part of the Synta umbrella (ok I'm maybe being a bit glib but you get my point hopefully). OVL Uk are probably the best people to ask as the UK distributers. Or better yet someone like FLO or RVO Never had an issue with Amazon either, they're usually pretty great - as long as its actually Amazon that you are dealing with. Some of the sellers on there can be a bit hit or miss.
  8. I have had my 8" SCT for 22+ years now. Must be doing something right. A key point in its favour is that it is very light and compact, so is easy to set up. I am considering getting a big Dobson as well. That won't replace the C8, merely complement it (and the 80mm triplet refractor, and 16x80 bins, and the solar scope )
  9. I tend to be a sensible sort of person who thinks things through before acting, ie. not impulsive, so my decision to buy my 12 inch Dobsonian was based on the two main criteria mentioned above - cost and practicality. I bought the very biggest scope I could afford and also the biggest I could sensibly handle, and I'm very pleased I did!
  10. JRM


    Hello Sainte, welcome to the lounge. Rick
  11. For doing occultations, IOTA ( International Occultation Timing Association) require analogue cameras coupled to a VTI ( Video Time Inserter) and recorder. Nigel
  12. I generally use my 100-400 L zoom for the moon on my crop-sensor cameras, but often crop the results as well. For real detail I end up using my C8, but that is a different ball game altogether.
  13. Er.... 39 metres......but then they're still muttering about 100 metres. Basicly when the money runs out.
  14. Bit unfair and not really true Sky X write the software its up to them to make it work - after all ,except for a few exceptions most Ascom aware software works very well on Win 7,8,10.
  15. Thanks for that. I am not so much after lots of detail but more to understand how to get the sizing correct. I will give you an example. This is a photo that looks similar to what i was seeing from my back garden (moon not as orange). Whan i tried to take a similar shot using my 18-55mm set at 55mm the resulting moon size appeared a lot smaller against the forground than it looked with my naked eye against the forground. Unfortunitly i do not have my photo any more as i deleted it. Appologies to the person who took this for me using as an example here.
  16. Camera with cooler. Green cone is focus gear (teeth not shown), red is camera casing, sealed and provides thermal insulation
  17. Regarding the desktop setting, if you scroll to the bottom left you'll find the Theme tab. Clicking that enables to switch to desktop view.
  18. Andrew is very right here. Also one size scope does not fit all, especially with UK skies & seeing ability to be fair Rob
  19. banjaxed


    Hi and welcome to SGL.
  20. that is indeed an option, but you won't really have the detail doing that, if you're trying to get any surface detail... best I can offer, try it, and see what it looks like. As for the illusion that the moon appears larger, that is true, and it's a deception, that if I recall correctly, your brain plays as putting the moon near the horizon allows you to get a sense of scale with the surroundings... I'm not aware of a method of being able to do what you're looking for any other way, I'd suggest trying to ensure you keep the same exposure settings, and do a gentle photoshoppery... If you really wanted a very detailed moon, you could grab a shot with the newt, and use that with the landscape... with some moon resizing.
  21. Quite. Which is why I qualified my remark with "Done properly it is very accurate". The spacing between mirror and lens is critical . Putting the lens on the end of the focussing tube is not going to give the required result. Nigel
  22. There are two main constraints, money and practicality (size and weight). In reality it depends on what you want to do and how you intend to do it. Visual v imaging , permanent obs v travel to dark sight etc. We all suffer. Find the type of observing you want to do and see what most use succesfully in that field. Regards Andrew PS then take the tablets
  23. Clicking "Blind" uses ASPS in APT plus I think you can tick a box to say use ASPS all the time in APT settings - so not just for GOTO++
  24. Thanks. It all goes back to trying to take a picture of that nice looking full moon through a smart phone. That nice sized moon ends up being a tiny dot in a smart phone camera picture. It is slightly better when i try with my 18-55mm dslr lens on a canon 200d set at 55mm but still not the same? It appears very small. Is it a case of take the picture with the 55mm lens then crop to the size i want?
  25. I would suspect "South Wales" would be a wide enough area to not be specific enough?
  1. Load more activity
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.