Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.


All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. Excellent stuff @lenscap. I agree with what you've said, if you sort the mounting out on some of these small scopes then they are surprisingly capable. I love trying to get the most out a small scope, it's often a great challenge and can be just as rewarding as different targets in larger scopes. I have a lovely little Tal Alkor which is a 65mm newt and is great fun since I put it in rings and mounted it on a decent EQ mount.
  3. Yeah, this is the version that was on my phone that I use for my screen wallpaper Was really pleased to get such a good result out of the Star Adventurer.
  4. Quite lovely and the (candifloss) nebulosity is great. Rotated left 90 degrees provides a view easier to appreciate on a computer screen. Makes me want to dig out the 135mm lens I purchased a while back to try a bit of wider field - but never got round to doing!
  5. That is one tiny newt! sounds like it pulls its weight.
  6. If that first image is after stacking, it's really not very good. I have had this sort of thing where the raw data was too poor to sharpen up during stacking. My efforts recently to image Jupiter with an 8" SCT and ASI224MC have not gone well either. Bad seeing made the planet have a corrugated limb at times. If conditions are good, you should be able to make out some surface detail, GRS etc in the live image. You should be able to focus on one of Jupiter's moons if seeing conditions are good. If you can't because it is fuzzing around too much, that is not a good sign. -I did not realize this was an old thread!
  7. OMG I just received mine from FLO. Haven’t opened the boxes yet - it’s for my birthday next month. Hope mine doesn’t make grinding noises.
  8. I went from a SW 150pl to a 250pds then a 300pds and now have a 16" Sumerian Optics Alkaid. The ease of use and lightness for me is great and I believe it has a very good primary mirror. It would also cost 4-5x the new price of a 300pds for a good reason. If you get to test scopes under the stars, use your highest power eyepiece on a bright star and compare the scatter from the star with that feom the other scopes. The better the mirrors, the less scatter.... of course using the same eyepiece would be needed to get a good comparison. You generally get what you pay for so go for the best you can afford.
  9. Yes, when I rotated the camera the elongated stars went from the side to the top.
  10. thanks David. where at quiet time again mate. clear skys. charl.
  11. thanks MG, wishing you clear mate. charl.
  12. A 16" Dob? Depends what you want to get out of using it. I know these instruments have their enthusiasts, and are said to give good views of nebulae from dark skies sites. So is this what you intend? The only 16" telescope I clearly remember seeing was a decidedly non-portable 16" SCT installed in an expensive-looking brick observatory. For planetary, it may not give better views than a much smaller instrument, as the performance will be essentially limited by the seeing, and not the size of the instrument. One sees reports from observers saying that they got a better view after stopping down their large scope. Even with an 8" SCT I find that seeing is a major factor, and that I can see a lot more detail via planetary imaging than at the eyepiece. 'Seeing' is also the limiting factor even with planetary imaging using a scope this size. For looking at galaxies, I was surprised to discover that a 4" aperture home-brewed EVAA outfit seemed capable of showing as much from my backyard as my 8" SCT did from a remote dark skies site.
  13. Today
  14. Well, me implying that someone else plays up saturation or contrast for dramatic effect would DEFINITELY be a case of stones thrown from glass houses. By a black pot, at a kettle. Etc., etc.. I like 'em dramatic and while I might blush at my own shamelessness from time to time, I make no apologies. If an image pleases you, it's doing what it's supposed to do, IMHO.
  15. Hi. Not sure what 'tilt moves', means... Are the stars are elongated in a different place in the frame when you rotate the camera? The position of the bad stars depends upon the camera rotation? JTOL. Cheers.
  16. I have told you before I am far from being expert, I know nothing. The good thing is I've got you thinking with much great Guide knowledge, lets hope between us we can get something sorted and working. On the bright side as it would appear I did absolutely nothing in relation to PPEC other than pass time, the mount performed very well indeed, so well I am sure some would ask why bother, Olly said to get down to 0.5sec in both RA and Dec is about as good as one can hope for, I was a bit better than this alot of the time. As for the flashes I would say I was getting intermittent two flashes. I will try this again, don't cost anything does it. Please let me know how you fair, looks li9ke weather is poor again here. Alan.
  17. Alan Just noticed that I've still shown 3 x 5K ohm resistors; I've corrected to show 1K ohm. Thanks, Peter
  18. Is it a newly purchased AZMP? Mine has grinding noise and squeaks when slewing in just one direction. Could only find operating manuals on ioptron website and opening it up will likely void the 2 year warranty. I've contacted the retailer, have you tried this or Ioptron support?
  19. +1 for some Radio astronomy workshop / talks from me as well. I'd also like some Pixinsight workshops - pretty please
  20. Mint as BNIB only used twice!.. fabulous EP. Every accept one edge of the box is perfect!. Looking for £115 which will include Royal Mail Special Recorded Delivery Reason for sale : Thought I could get away without selling, but need funds.
  21. When I started the other night with the reducer it wasnt this bad. I switched to the Hotech to see if it was any better but it looks worse. I'm thinking the SCA section isn't compatible with my scopes. They both have 2.5 inch drawtube but the 2" adapter isn't very deep. I had to arrange the rubber bands on the SCA to the centre, ie 3 together just so they seat within the adapter. I'm thinking this could be a reason. The focuser cant be this much out. More testing tonight I think.
  22. I took Jupiter and Saturn between 2-3am on morn 21/5. Edge HD SCT 9.25”. ZWO ASI290MM mini with RGB filter. Sharp cap. 2min runs (600 frames per) alternating RGB filters. 3 rounds. Approx 5fps. Gain 140 for memory. Williams Bahtinov mask for focus on nearby star. Histogram 70%. 1st real time for having ironed out the bugs. Autostaker, then Registax and then Winjupos. Seeing could have been better, beautiful clear night hear on Sunshine Coast in Qld, Australia that night. I am no expert in planetary photography but the frame rate was unflattering and gain 390 . I understand a high gain given you a higher frame rate but doesn’t it come at the cost of more grainy image? https://astrob.in/406998/0/ https://astrob.in/407000/0/
  23. Oh you just opened a can of worms Steve
  24. I think most interesting is the way Chinese brands (not only Synta/Sky-Watcher) are moving upmarket. Their manufacturing ability and QC has been improving year on year and they now produce some genuinely innovative products. The quality gap between them and other brands from Japan and the West is narrowing. In the astronomy products market the continental plates are shifting. I think that's as much as I can say on a forum that doesn't allow politics... Steve
  1. Load more activity
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.