Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.


All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. I have finally managed to get out and test the new 75mm to 300mm lens that arrived a few weeks back. I have not had chance to get a shot of both scenery and moon. I have only done the moon full frame. Anyway here is one of the moon at 300mm in the day time and one at 300mm at night.
  3. A Celestron Edge 11 inch weighs 12.7kg. Compared to a Meade ACF 10 inch that weighs 15kg and the 12 inch which is 25kg. Price-wise a 12 inch Meade costs the same as the 11 inch Celestron, but you'd need a considerably heftier (more expensive) mount to support it. Though when you get to the next step up: both outfits offer a 14 inch. Here both OTAs weigh about the same and the Meade is significantly cheaper. I reckon many people choose by looking at whether they want F/11 or F/8 native, plus what mount they have already and whether they want to spent €3k, €4k €6k or €9k.
  4. Charon


    Welcome aboard.
  5. I was thinking about this. How to get the scenery and moon both in focus. Then i saw a few photos and like you have shown it looks better with the scenery out of focus and the moon in focus.
  6. The problem here in the UK is planets do not get very high in the sky. A typical example is Saturn only reaching about 15 degrees maximum altitude at my Location at this time of year. It will be roughly the same for the OP. I see you have your location as India. I bet you have the planets appear at a very high altitude. We do not get that here in the UK.
  7. Thanks again for the kind words @Marvin Yes tourist place can be very expensive, particularly bars, restaurant and the like around them ... sometimes bordering on swindle ...
  8. Lol, well I have been imaging for 9 years and 2 weeks ago did the same thing. Doh!!!! You'd think I'd have learnt by now. Carole
  9. There is an option to move the primary mirror further into the tube. You have to replace two sets of bolts (6 in total), and probably get three longer springs, but if you don't mind taking your primary mirror out (simply done with 3 screws), then it isn't difficult. I've done it to a SW 1145P small newtonian (that needed quite long , and to my SW150PDS when I fitted a baader cliklock (only an extra 10mm needed for that one). Ady - this advice is based on you having a newt. Rereading the thread, I may have got that bit wrong
  10. Was reading a thread on CN recently on this very subject. Yes Meade make SCTs that are about as good as the Celestron but the Celestron are simply more popular among imagers. Think it’s down to the perception that Celestron SCTs are better for imaging rather than any real advantage although the Meade are a bit heavier and tend to be sold more as complete setups on fork mounts rather than seperate OTAs. However was also reading comments by a seller of used SCTs in the US that said 9 out of 10 Meades needed repairs before they could be sold on wheras with the Celestrons it was the other way round with 9 out of 10 just needing a cleanup and no repairs.
  11. Will try, but my sense is that it is vibrating between the mount point and the focusser: ie the flex tube struts. Ive adjusted this distance to a minimum - ie the clamp position along the dovetail rail. I also have played with the length of the tripod legs to see what affects the vibration frequency
  12. Hi. Oh dear. Too many variables? Suggestion: Lose the rpi for now and throw some decent resources at it. Get indi-ekos-kstars all on the same box; e.g. a laptop running ubuntu 18.04. Once you're familiar with it, then may be a better time to delegate parts of it -e.g. the indi server only on the rpi- to lower resource. +1
  13. I took a look at Siril, it looks a bit too much like Iris where you need a mathematical mind in order to get it to work. But I will mention it to the person i have been teaching as he is certainly more technical than me. Carole
  14. Now sold - mods please archive thanks
  15. I need more inward travel
  16. If I understand the requirements of EEA you don’t really need an EQ mount at all as the exposures are so short- an alt az mount is adequate I believe - so something like the AZgti or the Ioptron cube may suffice. Obviously if you wish to progress to AP in the near future then future proofing your purchase by going the EQ route may be the best bet, an EQ5 is more than adequate for a 80mm refractor. The rest is a camera, leads, software and possibly a laptop to capture the data and stack your subs. I would think if you go the second hand route this is very doable for under £1000. The key to EEA is shortish focal length to maximise the smallish sensor you will have. I may have missed some points but as I understand EEA that would be my route to take. Good luck and if you have any more questions feel free, SGL are a great bunch of people. HTH
  17. I have one of these and use it with my ES 24mm 82. I don’t find any draw back tbh. At that price it’s a steal. I’d be biting the sellers had off if I didn’t have one already steve
  18. Today
  19. I never found anything about the Bresser maksutov and collimating it, but I read about another make where one screw is a locking screw and the other is an adjusting screw and that would make sense with the Bresser. In practice I've never needed to adjust the collimation so I've not tried.
  20. The transparency here last night was good to excellent, so I had another try with my 180 Mak. With the scope and mount in a spot shielded by trees from a distant streetlight and the neighbour's outside light, NGC 5353 itself was fairly obvious with direct vision, as well as NGC 5350. The previous times I'd looked, NGC 5353 was only visible with averted vision. The SN was easily visible as a bright twinkling point at the S end of the galaxy at the point shown in published images, easiest at x100; higher mags made it too faint with DV, although it was still visible with AV - a consequence of the small aperture compared with John's report above I imagine where he found higher mags helped. Interesting that the long axis of the galaxy appeared to be visibly mottled - genuine or an optical artefact I wonder? Compared with a nearby 13.1 mag star GSC 3030-1046 (SkySafari). the SN seemed to me quite a bit fainter, up to nearly a factor of two. As Jupiter had risen above the murk by then (1:00 am), I popped my 102mm f13 frac on the SkyTee and had a quick look; lots of belt detail for the first time this year, but no interesting transitions or GRS. Chris
  21. Plenty of SH lenova lappies on Fleabay, been using one for the past 3 years still going strong, cost me £150, i5 SSd drive plenty of Ram and win7.
  22. Observed last night in an eight inch dob, 2 fov hops down in the finder from Zeta Ophiuchus. Could not see it in the 9x50 finder, but it was clear and quite bright in the ep at 24mm. Really makes you take your hat off to those early astronomers who discovered these things. The diligence, commitment and attention to detail to work out that- 'hang on- that dot has moved!' is really quite something.
  23. Hi, sorry for yet another post question, I am also looking to move into a dedicated imaging, planetary scope. I was hoping to find out some information regaring the Saxon Cielo HD 1.25" ED Eyepieces I am looking at the Sky Rover ULT 115 ED Glass Triplet 115mm APO Refractor Telescope The current eyepieces that i have are: Tele Vue Delos 10mm Baader Hyperion 5mm Wide angle eyepiece What i am hoping to find out is, how do my two eye pieces compare the the Saxon eyepieces in this telescope. I realise this might be a broad question, but i am trying to find out if i go with this telescope, am i better of with my eye pieces or will it perform better with the Saxon eyepieces. Any advice or information would be appreciated. Thanks.
  24. A lot of good information here. I realise they are a big unit and anything near Zenith is going to require something to stand on. Moving them in and out isn't a issue as i have a trolley system already setup complete with feet to get it level, so don't have to lift it anywhere. I might have to keep an eye out in the for sale sections for a bit to see what comes up. Haven't really seen much here in Australia apart from Skywatcher brands, but mainly going to be used for nebulae and deep sky viewing. Good information to think about though. Appreciated.
  1. Load more activity
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.