All Activity

What scope was that in, Louis? If a reflector, was that with a coma corrector and if so which one? Thanks.

You're correct. I'm coming from ioptron however where the power ports are on the back end so don't move, much better design I think.

Good to know! Not quite to thakt level, yet. I migrated from "eye-balling it" to getting a Celestron polar axis finder. and ZWO ASI camera. Because I was setting up for the first time I thought I would go ahead and fine-tune it. A word to the wise -- probably not a bad idea. The polar finders are supposed to be fairly accurate out of the box but mine was probably as far off as it could be. Two set screws (grub screws) were nearly all the way out, and the third was in so deep that it wouldn't budge. I have micro tools so tools weren't an issue. I suggest that when you buy something that has set screws in a ring, look to see if they are all about equal. They should be. If not, return it for having a defect or attempt to fix it at your risk. I happen to have micro screws so I will be able to deal with it. But I'm not happy. Cheers and clear skies ( good luck in the UK)!

Motor is an additional option. It'll be great and hope you enjoy this scope! 👍 Nikolai

How so? The layout seems similar to the AM5, at first glance.

Just in from a short but enjoyable session with the 140 frac. First Light for my Feathertouch on the scope. Wonderful as expected. Seeing seemed not too bad: 268x on the Moon was fine. One Plato craterlet on show, the big central one, in moments of clarity, but no Alpine rille, though it felt as though it should’ve been visible. Not sure what the optimum angle is for that. That remains a Nemesis for me. Epsilon Lyrae a nice split too, first look of the season. Magnus

Very interesting topic, as someone who owns and uses complex eyepieces with large glass in them. I've always tended to keep them just above ambient temperature to avoid misting / dewing when I come to use them (which, when it has occurred, out in the field, has been very annoying). I'm not aware of any performance issues arising from my approach but I suppose I'd have to run a comparison between a cooled eyepiece and one just above ambient to find out. Given that the eyepieces would need to be the same design and focal length to get a meaningful comparison, this might prove tricky to arrange 🙄 Perhaps it's a trade off situation - a small impact for a short time on view quality while the eyepiece cools VS the risk / inconvenience of fogging / misting as the warm eye gets close to the eye lens of a cool eyepiece. I guess the jury is out on this one ?

The annual Lyrid Meteor Shower should already be underway. It is expected to peak during the night of 2024 APR 21-22. Its radiant is in the vicinity of the constellations Lyra and Hercules near the bright star Vega. That is the direction toward which the meteor tails point, but the meteors are equally likely to appear anywhere in your sky. The Lyrids are debris from the long period Comet C/1861 G1 Thatcher. The Lyrids typically present about 5 to 20 meteors per hour for sharp eyed observers, although this has varied considerably with 700 per hour seen in 1803. The show begins after Lyra rises, which is in the early evening for mid-latitude northern hemisphere observers, but much later in the southern hemisphere. It will continue through morning twilight. During the shower’s peak, the waxing gibbous Moon may present some interference in the evening but less so before dawn. Descriptions of the shower or perhaps even lucky photos would be welcome additions to this thread.

They all look like pretend implements looking more closely. Probably just as well not to let them near sharp objects (or laser pointers) 🙄

The tube that is pictured sat on the dust cap of the scope needs to be fitted into the focuser and then the eyepiece goes into that. Apologies if you already know that ! Astro newtonians generally can't focus on things closer than a couple of hundred metres away so your test targets need to be a good way away to enable the scope to reach focus.

I won't lie, the 22mm NT4 is nice and sharp edge to edge compared to the 22mm Redline 70. It was enough different to persuade me to retire the Redline to the B-Team case in favor of the NT4 despite the tighter eye relief and slight SAEP in the NT4.

If you look down the tube from the open end, you should see a magnified image of your face like in a shaving mirror when you have your head at the right distance above the end. It's generally around 6 to 10 inches above the end, IIRC. This is just a quick test to see if the mirror can produce any sort of image.

Hi Dweller, Thinking about this again, from your perspective, perhaps I should have added a bit more of the reason for the question, to add context to it. Maybe if I'd done that, things would have turned out differently, as I certainly had no intention to fall out with anyone, especially given our previously good exchanges. 👍 It's because I'm going to get a 200pds, hence wondered what a 5" frac might add. Mark

Hi John I realised I never answered your last question. Indeed, I am fully intending to get a 200pds mounted on an AZEQ6 (which can also be used for dso AP with my 80ed). The final question in my mind, is whether it would be worth getting a 5" frac, to complement the newt. This was the reason behind my post. You probably remember I've mentioned a used sw120ed, which is most likely the direction I'd take, to keep cost down, rather than a new one or a new StellaMira 125.

Thanks Bob This is really useful! Just the sort of comparative information that I was looking for, to add to previous information supplied by others. It does seem as if both scopes are viewed differently, for some Newts beat the frac, for others fracs may show nicer planetary details. It may well come down to beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

@ollypenrice There's a very thin "string of rubies" coming in from the right edge in your image. It's different in your two versions. Is this real signal, or maybe an artefact?

Thanks Nicolàs, much appreciated too.

That's OK. I'm sure others will make their own minds up. I know I was genuinely asking the question as posted. That's what matters, as I know it to be true. 👍

Thanks Jeremy, much appreciated.

Thank you Clarkey, perhaps I should have said blue rather than green but that is by the way. The question that remains is:- how do you get the image panel moved up the physical screen? Chris

I think it best that we agree to disagree and move on. All the best in whatever choice you make 👍

Hi Dweller, Fair point, you have given lots of good advice on my posts. But your post just now, is still repeating, in my opinion, the same attack, but in a different form. Are you saying I wasn't being genuine in my post? Because I can tell you I was. So, when I said the title says it all, it did. So, you can either choose to believe me or not.

This should be reversed, as much as I love my refractor I’m pretty sure that in terms of resolution it cannot reveal more than a larger scope, i don’t care what design. Having said that, my refractor reveals things differently, but that is a whole other thread.

I tried looking at a tree, the sky and a building all blurry, if I took the eyepiece out and look through it should it also still be blurry because it is. Probably dumb questions but I have 0 clue so I really appreciate all the help