All Activity

I found the same AI Denoise problem with Windows 10 displaying the ”Runtime Error” on the stand alone version. My PC running Windows 10 22H2 (OS Build 19045.4291), basically with the latest updates, and has the problem but my observatory PC, which never gets updates and is not online just the local LAN (and only connected to the WEB to download things like these AI models) is version 19O3 (OS Build 18362.535) very old, and GraXpert 3.0.0 runs on it without problems... goes to show that being up to date with Windows updates is not always beneficial… I’d say quite rarely so when Microsoft is involved. This is a known problem to the developer so I’m sure version 3.0.1 is just around the corner.

Could the single screw in the eyepiece holder cause some newtons rings? I remove the eyepiece holder and attach my Hypercam 178 to the revealed T thread. That's the only way I can get focus! I do need to use a spacer as well as I've a Starlight focuser with very limited focus range. It's much better than the original helical focuser.

A diagonal is missing, possibly some sort of finder, maybe the handset ( I don't see one) and definitely the user manual, the telescope is mounted back to front.

It’s arrived 😁. My Atlas of the Messier Objects Second Edition was delivered today and having browsed the content I am overjoyed.

i actually thought the moon a pretty dull target to image, but your images are nothing short of amazing.

Apart from a brain it seems 😁. I haven't had the telescope out in years. It's a celestron Nexstar 127 mak. It's dust covered and I presume the kids have taken pieces from it. They're now at an age that they want to look at the moon etc. I could hunt the house or be lazy and buy new bits. I'm leaning towards buying new bits so I can have it working for the weekend. Please tell me what I need. I was going to order This eyepiece. And This power cable. What else am I missing? Links on Amazon prime would be most helpful and I'd owe you a pint 🍻 A 90 degree mirror? Although I think there's something else I've missed Thanks in advance

yes i've read nice things about the diagonal ... as for the clamp , the originals were not bad but of course the dual knobs on the ADM are preferable

That's good to hear, let us know how it goes, I've yet to update my dedicated phone for my scope yet. Clear skies Lee

Maybe try a 2D "fluid" head (the kind used by video makers) ? Mine handles up to 4-5kg, but there are some more robust ones which can handle 10kg and even more, and you usually don't pay the "astro tax" on them, so you may get a very good one for the price of your SW/Bresser/iOptron/Omegon wedge. I'm using mine with a Minitrack LX3 plus camera and lens (~3kg total) and it's a breeze to setup and lock the altitude, with no shift while locking, and no play once locked. YMMV. PS : of course you would need a good tripod and photo plate to fit, if you don't have them already.

I am the same so far, highly pleased with my initial handle and look through session.

Thanks Hughsie, I. Just noticed the front lens part of the Asi 120mm screws off. Will try it next sunshine we get but are the internal reflections coming from the Lunt optical train or does the camera lens window also add newtons rings? It would be quickly swapped into the Lunt eyepiece so little chance of dust. Anyone tried this?

That Bresser payload is only 5Kg I believe so you'll be limited on what you can mount onto it. That is the ioptron one. There is a more "advanced" ioptron wedge marketed as the SGP version for their tracker, never used it though. One is on eBay from overseas but by the time you add in import tax it'll be closer in price to the WO one.

My Astigmatism is 1.5 if memory serves me again = or - I have no idea. No modification, just with the eyecup fully down so far. Sadly weather has stopped the chance for mor testing.

I like it because it is story related, Its Folklore and that is something handed down by word or story. If it was scientific, then it would not be Folklore.

im gonna go look at astro tools see how big saturn and jupiter seem in my fov. i have a 600d 4.29 pizel size even with a 5x barlow, jupiter looks about 2 x 2 pixels in astronomy tools

I find the SL to be an excellent EP: sharp and flat across the FOV. I honestly have nothing negative to say about it.

A family member is giving me an older DSLR and lens to trade in for a new Mirrorless camera. I want to get something small and lightweight to take on holiday to Canada, and to start learning how to do nightscapes. There’s a Canon sale at the moment, but I’m told they are fairly common: I’m looking at the Canon R50 and Kit lens which will be £750-ish minus whatever I get for trade in. The other option is the older Canon RP but it’s £1000-ish. I could go for Used from a reputable shop for a bit less (but see below) I note that Used body only entry level mirrorless aren’t that much cheaper than a new entry level mirrorless with kit lens in a sale…. TL:DR what lightweight entry level mirrorless would you all recommend for nightscape and landscape photography? And are there better options in the Nikon/Sony ranges? Thanks NC

@Stu1smartcookie Nice! I love those reassuringly chunky alloy knobs on those plates, it just feels so much more secure! That diagonal looks ace too!

at least i have a flattener

I am interested in purchasing the Geoptik Nadira observing chair and was looking for vendors that will ship it to the USA. Any help would be appreciated. Clear skies and thank you.

been some time since i've used any processing software and gimp is free. i can basically open and save stuff, but i'd like to try, er cloning/smoothing out some parts of the starless image outputted from starnet, from a sprial galaxy image. mainly just to see if i can then stretch it further before bringing out too much noise. im gonna watch the link below but just wondered where the 'stretch view' (like i use in siril) is located or called? i can't google it if i don't know the official term. Also i assume gimp has a basic clone type tool for me to play about with?

You definitely will not need a flattener. John

I've shot the moon with a 90mm f6, barlow and a small pixel camera (178MM). It can be done. Requires fast frame rate video and autostakkert etc Jupiter and Saturn require longer focal lengths

ADM , Skytee Clamp ...and a 2" Stella Mira Diagonal , delivered this morning by the Royal Mail .

I suggest you buy and read Steve Richards' book "Making Every Photon Count" (available from FLO). Then research any newer developments (e.g. Siril software) online.