All Activity

@dweller25 I'm sorry I was aware of that but I forget to acknowledge that part my friend 🤦‍♂️👍

@Flame Nebula Yes definitely mate, sometimes we misunderstand each other. The fact you both eventually found common ground is testament to both of you's being decent human beings mate. I wish more people could do that also, considering the mess the world is in right now with war seemingly popping up everywhere!? Kindest Regards, Wes.

You missed out the bit where it got resolved. All is well 👍

Hi Wesdon, 🤣 Yes, very funny. 😁 Sometimes these things happen, but I think me and Dweller have sorted it now. I probably over-reacted yesterday, and looking back, I think it was all a case of lack of details from me mixed with misunderstandings about my intentions, which I accept were related to the missing context in my post. So, all good now.

If you're not aware, just check it's weight, its quite heavy so needs a good mount. I've had one and it was a great scope for sweeping the night sky and as an HA solar scope.. I've thought of getting another a few times and it's the weight that put me off.

I think Elena will nab those , Alan ... i think thats fair trade for letting me buy another one 🤣 Mark , i've got that damn song " my boomerang won't come back " in my head now ...lol

That long?

It can also be affected by wind which can cause the stars to trail. Even if there's a little wind I try to set up where it's sheltered. If it's too windy I leave it fir another day.

ZWO have parted with using Raspberry Pi boards and have their own using Rockchip processors so can be more flexible on their internals. Likely to be similar to what's in the ZWO Seestar but with more external ports.

I think there can be various causes, but the one that comes to mind is that if the target is very close to the zenith then alt az mounts have more difficulty tracking.

This is clever stuff Lee - the defaults in PI Image Solve & Annotate can be overwhelming! Another great job joining all four panes - seamless integration and a perfect background - to my eyes! Adrian

Hi I want to ask a question but don't know we're to ask it so I hope you don't mind me asking here , when I use my seestar most of the time I get messages like "stack failed star trails so binned" or not enough stars , any ideas why I get these ? Kind regards Neil

A very nice set of LVs indeed. You are only missing the 2” ones (30mm and 50mm). And of course, the 1.25” ones are brilliant in binoviewers, so you are only half done 😁😎🤣

Your gonna have to name these scopes 'boomerangs' Stu 😉 Mark.

The AZEQ6, 80mm refractor, 5” refractor and 8” Newtonian is a great combo and would cover imaging and visual nicely 👍

Sorry, I’m busy at the moment

@dweller25 @Flame Nebula Now Now Children! Play Nice!! 😂 ( I'm so sorry! I couldn't help myself! It just reminded me of a back n forth I had the other week with a guy on Facebook! 🤦‍♂️😂 )

Where’s @JOCwith her battery tools when you need her?

LOL I concur! This hobby has a high rate of gear and aperture fever, and it's more contagious than covid! 😱😂

I’ll give it 18 months until you’ve outgrown the new case, Alan 🤣

Bill Paolini, in his comparative test of diagonals had this to say about thermal settling: ‘ Diagonals absolutely require thermal acclimation time for best planetary performance! Going from a 70ºF inside temperature to a 30ºF outside temperature took a toll on the diagonals, particularly the 2" non-Prisms as they showed astigmatism even directly on-axis. The prisms did not show astigmatism, but did show a less sharp view until thermal equilibrium was achieved. Generally 15-30 minutes was required for optimal high magnification performance.’ Diagonals not eyepieces, but it seems reasonable to think that a chunky, multi-element eyepiece is going to need at least similar consideration. I don’t think it’s just about the behaviour of air in the tube and above the mirror surface, though of course those are always an issue. It makes sense, I think, that an eyepiece, especially one that is physically big and contains numerous lumps of glass with different thicknesses, figures and refractive indices, all supposedly ‘finely tuned’ to work together, stacked usually in a metal housing, is going to be subject to differential heating/cooling through its body - and it won’t perform as designed and intended until everything has settled down. FWIW, I expect to have to allow for this, especially when using big or complex eyepieces or the binoviewer with its GPCs, whenever I’m trying to get the best out of my frac.

First light yesterday evening for my Svbony zoom, which I received a few days ago. I only looked at the Moon early in the evening. I agree with everything people say about this eyepiece: it's really good! The views were amazing with my Tak FC-76DCU. Sadly Jupiter was very low on the horizon and not visible from my rooftop. I did try through the toilets window, but that wasn't easy I also agree with the minor annoyances, eye relieve at 3mm and the stiffness of the ring. But for 99€, that eyepiece is a bargain and definitely a keeper. I can't wait to try it out on planets once they're back into view! Here is a pic I grabbed (with a Nagler, so that's just for context!)

@Bivanus F**K YES!! 💪💪💪😂 ( Really sorry! I would never normally soil this mature website with foul language, but I just couldn't help myself! I think I have been exposed to too many American action hero movies! 🤦‍♂️😂 )

You should be able to reset the layout from options. Also check out you tube videos on how the layout works.

@Elp Definitely mate. Some would call us mad...I'd say we're simply passionate about the hobby! You're not alone there my friend, my data data turned out usable ( just ) but in no way is it adequate recompense for the grueling effort I made! LOL ( but then I say to myself...my recompense is the wonderful unique hobby itself, not just how good my data is at the end of the night! ☺️ )