Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_31.thumb.jpg.b7a41d6a0fa4e315f57ea3e240acf140.jpg

M92, NGC 6336 and NGC 6332
 
© D Elijah
Credit D Elijah

M92, NGC 6336 and NGC 6332



Date 24/03/2017. The Globular cluster (M92) was my final target of the night. I normally spend time imaging M13 (just to the south of M92). However, I decided to dedicate the rest of the nights imaging to this lovely little globular cluster. It is quite a dense cluster that consists of two types of star (either pink white or jade green), I tried different RGB colour balances to bring out this difference. Also, the small and faint galaxies NGC 6332 and NGC 6336 are viable in the top right (RA+, DEC+) and top middle of the image repectively.

Weather: The sky was clouding up near the end of the night. Seeing was good. Wind was still strong (9-12mph) and I lost quite a few frames because of vibrations. Temperature was about 3-5 degrees.

Optics and camera: Skywatcher Evostar 120 F/D=8.33 (Achromat) with a Baader UHCs filter (for removing light pollution). The camera was a IR-filter removed Canon 600D.

Settings: 28 x 3 minute lights, 50 darks from library, 50 flats taken recently and 50 bias frames. ISO 800.

Mount: Skywatcher AZ-EQ6 with extension pillar.

Processing: The Lights and calibrations frames were processed using Deep Sky Stacker. I set the star detection thresholds to values that caught about 30-40 stars. The final images were stretched in RGB and I then balanced the histograms to retain white balance. Luminance was tweaked to show faint stars. I also used Gimp to add a selective Gaussian blur over a 5 pixel range to blend the RGB noise.

Credit

D Elijah

Copyright

© D Elijah
  • Like 1

From the album:

Photos from Bury

  • 90 images
  • 1 comment
  • 49 image comments


Recommended Comments

Considering the conventional wisdom is that you can't do AP with a cheap and simple achromat these are very good. The UHC filter doubtless helps a lot...

RL

Link to comment
9 minutes ago, rl said:

Considering the conventional wisdom is that you can't do AP with a cheap and simple achromat these are very good. The UHC filter doubtless helps a lot...

RL

Thanks RL,

The filter does help a lot with removing LP and the blue halos but tbh the scope doesn't really produce a huge amount of chromatic aberration, maybe I got a good example from Skywatcher. Also, the evostar has a nice flat field and no other serious optical aberrations. However, at F/D = 8.3, it is slow and building up a decent image takes time.

Dan :happy7:

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.